Massman Posted May 8, 2013 Share Posted May 8, 2013 (edited) Since I'm doing this for IVB, might as well do it for everything else. Overall Piledriver Focus: Vishera CPU Focus: Trinity APU Focus: Richland APU Edited March 2, 2016 by Massman Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
flanker Posted May 25, 2013 Share Posted May 25, 2013 easy... http://hwbot.org/submission/2383299_flanker_superpi___32m_fx_8350_19min_0sec_155ms?recalculate=true Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Massman Posted May 25, 2013 Author Share Posted May 25, 2013 Updated list, nice! Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
flanker Posted May 25, 2013 Share Posted May 25, 2013 If I have more time, I try tighter DRAM timings and around 2800 MHz CPUNB. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Xtreme Addict Posted May 25, 2013 Share Posted May 25, 2013 I am not used to the look of rankings, I don't like the idea of counting everything in seconds I prefer format like in SuperPI lol But great job with those rankings. I would take part in AMD if SuperPI 32M time wasn't 19 minutes lol Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
flanker Posted May 25, 2013 Share Posted May 25, 2013 Maybe PiFast, there is Vishera good. Or wprime (but its hard loading benchmark, nothing easy sometimes) Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
TaPaKaH Posted May 25, 2013 Share Posted May 25, 2013 I would take part in AMD if SuperPI 32M time wasn't 19 minutes loltweak it, and it won't be 19 minutes anymore Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
flanker Posted May 25, 2013 Share Posted May 25, 2013 its really strange, Vishera is worse in superpi than Bulldozer but in others old benchmars is much better (PiFast) Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
The Stilt Posted May 29, 2013 Share Posted May 29, 2013 The "King Trinity" was better than I remembered. An early, low leak chip I binned a year ago. http://www.hwbot.org/submission/2384150_the_stilt_superpi___32m_a10_5800k_18min_34sec_512ms?recalculate=true Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
NoMS Posted May 29, 2013 Share Posted May 29, 2013 The "King Trinity" was better than I remembered. An early, low leak chip I binned a year ago. http://www.hwbot.org/submission/2384150_the_stilt_superpi___32m_a10_5800k_18min_34sec_512ms?recalculate=true How good is the IGP of this "King Trinity"? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Massman Posted May 29, 2013 Author Share Posted May 29, 2013 Updated list - surely this can be a lot faster Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
I.nfraR.ed Posted May 29, 2013 Share Posted May 29, 2013 Since I don't have a working Z77 board at the moment, it seems a good idea to bring the Trinity out of the closet . Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
The Stilt Posted May 29, 2013 Share Posted May 29, 2013 It has been so long since I really benched SuperPI so I've already forgot all of the tweaks The memory bandwidth on 15h is irrelevant on SuperPI while the global latency is everything, a complete opposite to 3D. A 1.6GB/s increase in the bandwidth yielded less than 2 second improvement, while the FIFO latency remained at the same level (MEMCLK/NCLKs). After calibrating certain settings manually I was able to disable SlowAccessMode and tighten up the internal syncronization. The 'data eye' is exactly where it should be, even I don't have a scope in my disposal Atleast I can say that ACI would have worked http://www.hwbot.org/submission/2384254_the_stilt_superpi___32m_a10_5800k_18min_26sec_479ms?recalculate=true The bandwidth and the latency seems to be okay too. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
The Stilt Posted May 29, 2013 Share Posted May 29, 2013 How good is the IGP of this "King Trinity"? It is decent. The trouble is that you need a high leakage part for 3D. There is a strict upper limit for UNB VDD which cannot be passed on any of the parts, no matter if they have low or high leakage properties. Or you can, but you'll kill the chip if you do. A part with higher leakage properties will require less voltage for frequency X than a part with lower leakage properties. The 'voltage range' will simply be exhausted too soon on the low leakage parts. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Massman Posted May 29, 2013 Author Share Posted May 29, 2013 It has been so long since I really benched SuperPI so I've already forgot all of the tweaks - XP - Largesystemcache=1 - About 3 working services - maxmem - copywaza That's about it. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
I.nfraR.ed Posted May 30, 2013 Share Posted May 30, 2013 (edited) Even if I consider myself as "ok" pi32 tweaker, I'm currently many seconds behind. A lot to learn for Trinity, unless it's some stupid thing that slows things down. Far away from froxic too, eventhough his cpu is not at 5GHz. PS: Found the reason - it's called XP. Win7 is so much faster at least on my board. My cpu is an ultra high leakage part and while it was possible to run 5GHz on XP, it's not the same on 7, so I'll probably have to get the SS running. Edited May 30, 2013 by I.nfraR.ed Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
I.nfraR.ed Posted May 31, 2013 Share Posted May 31, 2013 Finally a proper run without tweaks and wazza. LSC only. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
I.nfraR.ed Posted May 31, 2013 Share Posted May 31, 2013 Some improvement http://hwbot.org/submission/2384859_i.nfrar.ed_superpi___32m_a10_5800k_18min_24sec_341ms Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
The Stilt Posted June 1, 2013 Share Posted June 1, 2013 Some improvement http://hwbot.org/submission/2384859_i.nfrar.ed_superpi___32m_a10_5800k_18min_24sec_341ms That is unacceptable! http://hwbot.org/submission/2385234_the_stilt_superpi___32m_a10_5800k_18min_20sec_219ms Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
I.nfraR.ed Posted June 1, 2013 Share Posted June 1, 2013 That is unacceptable! You're completely right http://hwbot.org/submission/2384859_i.nfrar.ed_superpi___32m_a10_5800k_18min_12sec_875ms Got XP working and properly tweaked. What I did is to install it on AHCI mode vs IDE before. Does it really make so big difference? Couldn't beat you on 7 though, got around 18:22 on same settings as above screenshot. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
flanker Posted June 2, 2013 Share Posted June 2, 2013 omg, so after reviews time I must set back XP and FX-8350, Trinity cant be better Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Bones Posted June 2, 2013 Share Posted June 2, 2013 Figured I'd give it a shot and came up with this. http://www.hwbot.org/submission/2385370_ Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
flanker Posted June 2, 2013 Share Posted June 2, 2013 very nice. I was only surprised, how good The Stilt is with Trinity ... Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Massman Posted June 2, 2013 Author Share Posted June 2, 2013 Nice one, Bones! Only 90 seconds away from sub-1000s on AMD Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
The Stilt Posted June 2, 2013 Share Posted June 2, 2013 (edited) You're completely right http://hwbot.org/submission/2384859_i.nfrar.ed_superpi___32m_a10_5800k_18min_12sec_875ms Got XP working and properly tweaked. What I did is to install it on AHCI mode vs IDE before. Does it really make so big difference? Couldn't beat you on 7 though, got around 18:22 on same settings as above screenshot. Are you sure you did not forget "Turbo Core" on or something? Swapped the PSC to Elpida Hypers and did some tests. DDR-2133 7-7-5-19-1T is around five seconds slower than DDR-2666 9-11-8-24-1T. DDR-2400 8-9-7-24-1T is around two seconds slower than DDR-2666 9-11-8-24-1T. My 18.20.xx time was done on tweaked XP, it made around 6 seconds of difference. Your time should be atleast 2 seconds slower than mine as thats the difference between our memory frequencies. I also have tighten up the FIFO latency manually (these adjustments are not available on any motherboard), it is worth around 1 second. None of the tweaks (besides large system cache) made any difference, my OS is quite light by default (41MB RAM usage after boot). Purging the physical memory / releasing the system resource allocation (Wazaa) only seems to be worth of 0.5 seconds or so. So where has my 10 seconds gone Edited June 2, 2013 by The Stilt Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.