richba5tard Posted May 30, 2013 Share Posted May 30, 2013 Goddamn, NASA misspelled our missile again! Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Xtreme Addict Posted May 30, 2013 Share Posted May 30, 2013 lmao Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Alex@ro Posted May 30, 2013 Share Posted May 30, 2013 was massman heading to set new headquarter on mars ? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Christian Ney Posted May 30, 2013 Share Posted May 30, 2013 lol Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Crew Turrican Posted May 30, 2013 Crew Share Posted May 30, 2013 nice Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
sin0822 Posted May 30, 2013 Share Posted May 30, 2013 nice! Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Massman Posted May 30, 2013 Share Posted May 30, 2013 I feel so North Korea right now Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
SoF Posted May 31, 2013 Share Posted May 31, 2013 That had to get reported due to CPUz missing Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
crustytheclown Posted May 31, 2013 Share Posted May 31, 2013 Oh new ln2 tank from NASA!!!! Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
thebanik Posted May 31, 2013 Share Posted May 31, 2013 lol... Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Eeky NoX Posted May 31, 2013 Share Posted May 31, 2013 Just what I thought at first sight Crusty Nice catch boss!! Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
saint19 Posted May 31, 2013 Share Posted May 31, 2013 So MOA finals are in the moon....awesome!!! Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
xxbassplayerxx Posted May 31, 2013 Share Posted May 31, 2013 Saw this and thought the exact same thing lol Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
trodas Posted September 11, 2013 Share Posted September 11, 2013 NASA is doing strange errors all the time, lol But this one was unforgivable! That one, on the other hand, is just a trackless Rover: http://www.hq.nasa.gov/alsj/a17/AS17-137-20979HR.jpg This is just laughable Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
trodas Posted September 24, 2013 Share Posted September 24, 2013 Come on, people Laugh a bit... this is funny ...oh, wait... I hope you did not believe these Never A Straight Answer people, do you? Then come on - find me tracks, how the Rover get to these directions: http://www.hq.nasa.gov/alsj/a15/AS15-88-11902HR.jpg http://www.hq.nasa.gov/alsj/a15/AS15-88-11901HR.jpg http://www.hq.nasa.gov/office/pao/History/alsj/a17/AS17-140-21354HR.jpg http://www.hq.nasa.gov/alsj/a17/AS17-143-21932HR.jpg http://www.hq.nasa.gov/alsj/a17/AS17-143-21857HR.jpg http://www.hq.nasa.gov/alsj/a15/AS15-86-11603HR.jpg http://www.hq.nasa.gov/alsj/a17/AS17-142-21796HR.jpg - how do the astroNOTs get back to the LEM?! http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/e/ed/Apollo15LunarRover.jpg http://apolloanomalies.com/missing_tracks.htm ... At least on 4chan have people some humor, when I brought this up: :nana: ...but hey, there is another good video example of how much of these tracks are missing from the LRO images in places, where they are photographed before... :celebration: This is pitiful. Photoshopping is not that hard to do, people. Come on... But this lighthouse trick they maked out of Surveyor 3 is... amazing! Keep this fun comming :banana: Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
trodas Posted September 27, 2013 Share Posted September 27, 2013 meteorites observations classified http://www.space.com/6829-military-hush-in...classified.html So, now are even meteors classified - lol. 15 years - no problemo, but now - US gov is just did not wishing anything to be known. Very pathetic. What more can be classified? What about... how much CO2 are in the atmosphere by %...? That should not be classified? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Massman Posted September 30, 2013 Share Posted September 30, 2013 Meteor Classified is evga's new card? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
trodas Posted September 30, 2013 Share Posted September 30, 2013 Probably But it is interesting, that eVGA Classified owner (lowfat, Hardware Canucks forum) reported that it fold almost all the WU wrong. What is going on there?! Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
trodas Posted September 30, 2013 Share Posted September 30, 2013 (edited) Maybe someone... stoled something? Or the drivers care only about GFX performance? So do the card? Cannot switch to 3D voltages while folding? Dunno. But stealing is not nice - not even when people steal rocks: http://www.hq.nasa.gov/alsj/a17/AS17-146-22293HR.jpg http://www.hq.nasa.gov/alsj/a17/AS17-146-22294HR.jpg Same scene from video, the rock from AS17-146-22293HR photo is nowhere near to be found: http://youtu.be/Z0438bdGbS0?t=48m23s http://youtu.be/Z0438bdGbS0?t=53m58s ...and sometimes even tracks are stealed... or do they last only 5 minuted on the "Moon"? AS15-82-11140 - time 165:39:51 - http://www.hq.nasa.gov/alsj/a15/AS15-82-11140HR.jpg AS15-82-11141 - time 165:44:46 - http://www.hq.nasa.gov/alsj/a15/AS15-82-11141HR.jpg time: http://www.hq.nasa.gov/alsj/a15/images15.html (time: mission hours:min:sec) ...but there is, as bonus, some rocks added now (and to this day, I was under the firm impression, that Apollo supposedly gather rocks on the Moon - like these: http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/europe/8226075.stm -, not added the rocks from Earth on the Moon ) Edited July 29, 2014 by trodas Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
trodas Posted July 25, 2014 Share Posted July 25, 2014 Video pans shows of the previous scene with missing rock, clearly visible on this picture: http://youtu.be/Z0438bdGbS0?t=48m23s ... http://youtu.be/Z0438bdGbS0?t=53m58s Rock is nowhere near to be found :D (like the WMD in Iraq, Syria Sarin gas attacks proofs of Assad, etc...) ... I would also like to report that NASA stole... the Sun! They do it quite cleverly - so we do not notice, they created this thing: http://www.lpi.usra.edu/resources/apollo/images/print/AS12/46/6765.jpg'>http://www.lpi.usra.edu/resources/apollo/images/print/AS12/46/6765.jpg ...and claim, that this is the Sun itself There are only two "slight" problems. The first problem is, that the reflector does not generate enought bright light like Sun, to blow any color away: org image of Sun: http://ww1.prweb.com/prfiles/2007/04/30/522958/Slide42.JPG org image of NASA "Sun": http://www.lpi.usra.edu/resources/apollo/images/print/AS12/46/6766.jpg ...so in the middle, when curves are used in Photoshop, we clearly see the difference between real Sun and this fake: org picture: http://www.lpi.usra.edu/resources/apollo/images/print/AS12/46/6765.jpg Another example: http://s14.postimage.org/44u1twzcx/lightbulb_anim.gif ... But wait, that is not all. This new "Sun" also does produce weird reflections... frankly they are kinda... huge, while real Sun reflections are reasonably small: Real Sun also should not change it's intensity to flick like that: http://s23.postimg.org/a6ihlk6y3/blikajici_slunce_1.gif http://s7.postimg.org/ucevk5l7f/blikajici_slunce_2.gif :D Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest TheMadDutchDude Posted July 26, 2014 Share Posted July 26, 2014 LOL. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
trodas Posted July 30, 2014 Share Posted July 30, 2014 Apollo 17 flag ceremony - so much for live broadcast, huh? http://pictureshack.ru/images/75252_Apollo_17_fading_flag_ceremony.gif Original video: http://ulozto.cz/xhyELjA/apollo-17-fading-flag-ceremony-wmv Fading flag video discovery by Jarrah White: Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
trodas Posted August 2, 2014 Share Posted August 2, 2014 (edited) So back in 1969, NASA fly to the Moon w/o problems - no fatal failure, at least. Todays NASA cannot fly astronauts to just Earth orbit. ... Then why terrible problems are on every second image of Apollo? What the hell is this?! http://www.lpi.usra.edu/resources/apollo/images/print/AS12/47/6984.jpg'>http://www.lpi.usra.edu/resources/apollo/images/print/AS12/47/6984.jpg Where is the problem? First at all, there is a apparent hotspot near the shadow of the head of this astroNOT. That itself prove, that this is a studio light, so not a Moon. But there is a worser problem. The center of each Apollo photo is marked by the biggest cross. Therefore we see, that there is no cropping, that could make this photo possible. The biggest problem? Well, the shadow of the astroNOT, that is supposedly taking the picture, is not pointing to him, but to another person (stativ), his shadow is not even present on the picture. ... Still not getting it? Okay, the shadow on the picture must point to the center of the image, to the astroNOT, taking the picture. Like this: http://www.hq.nasa.gov/alsj/a11/AS11-40-5930HR.jpg http://www.hq.nasa.gov/alsj/a12/AS12-47-6941HR.jpg http://www.hq.nasa.gov/alsj/a12/AS12-47-6985HR.jpg http://www.hq.nasa.gov/office/pao/History/alsj/a17/AS17-136-20744HR.jpg ...and NOT like this: http://www.hq.nasa.gov/alsj/a11/AS11-40-5961HR.jpg http://www.lpi.usra.edu/resources/apollo/images/print/AS12/47/6984.jpg http://www.hq.nasa.gov/alsj/a12/AS12-46-6848HR.jpg http://www.hq.nasa.gov/alsj/a12/AS12-46-6796HR.jpg ... Of course I managed, after brief search, to find many similar ones: http://www.lpi.usra....e/?AS11-40-5962 http://www.lpi.usra....e/?AS11-40-5961 http://www.lpi.usra....e/?AS11-40-5928 http://www.lpi.usra....e/?AS12-46-6730 http://www.lpi.usra....e/?AS12-46-6751 http://www.lpi.usra....e/?AS12-46-6753 http://www.lpi.usra....e/?AS12-46-6775 http://www.lpi.usra....e/?AS12-46-6776 http://www.lpi.usra....e/?AS12-46-6796 http://www.lpi.usra....e/?AS12-46-6846 http://www.lpi.usra....e/?AS12-46-6848 http://www.lpi.usra....e/?AS12-48-7059 http://www.lpi.usra....e/?AS12-48-7082 http://www.lpi.usra....e/?AS14-64-9099 http://www.lpi.usra..../?AS15-86-11596 http://www.lpi.usra..../?AS15-86-11644 http://www.lpi.usra....?AS17-137-21008 ...etc... Hadley: a study in fakery (version 2) http://msp.warwick.ac.uk/~cpr/hadley.pdf Is it plausible that three views of the same mountain from different places should have exactly the same outline (differing only in scale)? No: real mountains always look different from different viewpoints. :D :D New studies: 'Conspiracy theorists' sane; government dupes crazy, hostile http://www.veteranstoday.com/2013/07/14/whatabout7/ Edited July 21, 2015 by trodas added info Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
trodas Posted August 7, 2014 Share Posted August 7, 2014 Proof, that Apollo astroNOTs cannot survive the journey thru the Van Allen belts, not even by this way, the ex-CIA Robert A. Braeunig thought he will sping it, so the crews spendt only 40min in the less intensive part of the belts and 20 in the more intensive part: http://www.braeunig.us/apollo/apollo11-TLI.htm It is nonsense, because Apollo astroNOTs always claim, that they go straight for the Moon (or more precisely to the place, where Moon will be, when they got there - witch is another rason, why they cannot "hit the mark" by manual control and only one mid course correction) and that it confirmed by Apollo flight journals, triangulating using stars on simgle spot in the space, not using any parabolic way, that would require more corrections in course and entierly different level of calculation. This cannot be done "by hand", so the parabolic way is nonsense even by Apollo standards. To make matters worse, the Moon is orbiting the Earth with ange to equator (inclination) 28.65°: http://www.psrd.hawaii.edu/Dec96/earmoon.html This is kinda close to 30° inclination, witch is regarded as the worsest inclination to get more radioactve exposure. So the results witch Jarrah calculated, would be much, much more worser in reality. Yet even when we accept the Braeunig fantasies as true, even then the radioactive doses are so high, that there is no chance to survive this journey at all: MoonFaker: Radioactive Anomaly III Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
trodas Posted July 21, 2015 Share Posted July 21, 2015 Armstrong lunar suit degrades, collection might save him Apollo vacuumproof zip suit http://novinky.cz/koktejl/375534-.html So we again see the legendary vacuumproof (in -200°C to +130°C temps) crotch zip of Apollo suits! Yay! Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.