xxbassplayerxx Posted July 21, 2015 Share Posted July 21, 2015 wat Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
trodas Posted July 22, 2015 Share Posted July 22, 2015 (edited) Nevermind! Just comparing Philae photos of the comet to the alleged Moon photos ...or a astronomer amateur picture of Mount Hadley on the Moon. Please notice the *VERY* sharp and distinguished mountain profile (see the shadow!): Now compare that with Apollo "Moon surface" photos of the Moon: http://www.hq.nasa.gov/alsj/a15/AS15-87-11792HR.jpg http://www.hq.nasa.gov/alsj/a15/AS15-82-11118HR.jpg http://www.hq.nasa.gov/alsj/a15/AS15-82-11117HR.jpg http://www.hq.nasa.gov/alsj/a15/AS15-82-11119HR.jpg http://www.hq.nasa.gov/alsj/a15/AS15-82-11178HR.jpg http://www.hq.nasa.gov/alsj/a15/AS15-82-11123HR.jpg http://www.hq.nasa.gov/alsj/a15/AS15-82-11116HR.jpg http://www.hq.nasa.gov/alsj/a15/AS15-82-11112HR.jpg Real images from 67P/Churyumov-Gerasimenko comet by ESA Rosetta satelite and his Philae module: ...of course everyone who studied know that the Apollo photos are fake for a very long time... http://msp.warwick.ac.uk/~cpr/hadley.pdf Edited November 30, 2015 by trodas Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Apfelkuchen Posted July 22, 2015 Share Posted July 22, 2015 What exactly is the purpose of this thread right now? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
K404 Posted July 22, 2015 Share Posted July 22, 2015 Well, it reminded me that I need more tinfoil. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ObscureParadox_3XS Posted July 22, 2015 Share Posted July 22, 2015 Well, it reminded me that I need more tinfoil. Christ sakes Kenny Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Apfelkuchen Posted July 22, 2015 Share Posted July 22, 2015 Goddamn mvp Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
trodas Posted July 24, 2015 Share Posted July 24, 2015 (edited) legendary vacuumproof crotch zip of Apollo suits xxbassplayerxx - wat Dat: First revisions had the zipper clearly visible: Later versions fixed that by a simple patch - what did not you see, did not disturb you: Zips are known to be airtight, aren't they? :nana: Apfelkuchen - What exactly is the purpose of this thread right now? Fun? Pushing the limits of what is considered possible and allowed to debate? Informing? K404 - Well, it reminded me that I need more tinfoil. Clearly :celebration: Or "they" can read your mind But, on the other hand, maybe they already got you: http://www.technologyreview.com/news/527561/military-funds-brain-computer-interfaces-to-control-feelings/ - http://www.unknowncountry.com/news/brain-implants-no-bigger-dust-particles-way - http://www.wireheading.com/delgado/brainchips.pdf Just few more pulses and everyone accept that this is a used rocket motor nozzle, where the gases got to almost 2200°C temps: http://www.hq.nasa.gov/alsj/a14/AS14-66-9261HR.jpg ...but watch out for these motorcycle engines, their output gases are up to 600°C, and that cause really nasty burns on the exhaust pipes Edited July 24, 2015 by trodas Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Crew Leeghoofd Posted July 24, 2015 Crew Share Posted July 24, 2015 HWBOT is going interstellar... Trodas spends too much time on this... seems there's too much Hollywood involved at NASA... let's get back to OCing the crap out of things... Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
K404 Posted July 24, 2015 Share Posted July 24, 2015 In space: no oxygen, no impurities, no environmental heat, no moisture. The oxidation of metal will be COMPLETELY different... but I don't know how.... because i've never been to space. So.... you've asked a question that needs asked, but you've not done enough to make me think you have the answer. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ObscureParadox_3XS Posted July 24, 2015 Share Posted July 24, 2015 Were the suits not filled with oxygen anyway? So surely oxidization would still be an issue? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
K404 Posted July 24, 2015 Share Posted July 24, 2015 Oh, i'm just thinking about the exhaust Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ObscureParadox_3XS Posted July 24, 2015 Share Posted July 24, 2015 urgh, mobile didn't load the full conversation and I only saw the space suit, derp on my part..... Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
trodas Posted July 24, 2015 Share Posted July 24, 2015 Leeghoofd - talking about Interstellar... seen this part? Sure it did not prove anything. But someone is slowly but surely preparing people that once this will blow out quite wide K404 - In space: no oxygen, no impurities, no environmental heat, no moisture. No enviromental heat in space? Now come on! The Moon is, lit by Sun, getting quite hot. 130°C near equator: http://web.archive.org/web/20090327111837/http://lro.gsfc.nasa.gov/moonfacts.html "The surface temperature at the equator during the day is 134°C" There is plenty of heat and what is even worser - there is no way to radiate it away in vacuum of space. No airflow. You cook alive... The oxidation of metal will be COMPLETELY different... but I don't know how.... because i've never been to space. Oxidation of metal? Who is suggesting that? In vacuum? Nah. I just saying, that the nozle is painted and I would like to see paint, that can holt on "whatever it is painted on" with 2 000°C So.... you've asked a question that needs asked, but you've not done enough to make me think you have the answer. I have the answer, but I'm not going to just say it. I did not want to tell people what is. I like when people come to own conclusions. Giving just answers is easy and boring. And I can show you, that I did my homework long time ago. Temperature of classic exhaust engine plumes top at 600°C: http://www.nobugs.org/bike/engine.html Temperature of the LEM landing engine is not mentioned anywhere (maybe that is because ppls might start asking, why the dust was not melted, when rocks are turning into pemza at just about 1 000°C temp), but we know it supposedly burn on Aerozin 50 mixture, witch according to one source produce temperature 2526°C in the engine and 1726°C after the exhaust nozle ( Aerospace Propulsion Systems, page 163, 164 http://books.google.cz/books?isbn=0470824972 ), another source put that temperature in the chamber at 3226°C, so it should be 2204°C after the exhaust nozle ( http://web.archive.org/web/20080123094409/http://www.experiencefestival.com/a/Bipropellant_rocket_-_Cooling/id/4854296 ). So... what do you say? Not done enought so I know the answer? Oh man. Come on. All you really need are your very own eyes to see the obvious: Apollo 17, allegedly liftoff from the "Moon": Org. NASA video: http://www.hq.nasa.gov/alsj/a17/a17v_1880127.mpg Do you really need to be told, what the "little" problem is? Just... just the camera pan. Earth - Moon is 1.3sec. So 2.6sec delay between visible change and signal from Earth to correct the camera ange. Add 400mS for the person to react and you got 3 sec. Do the panning looks 3sec delayed to you? Do the "module" left the center of the image in any time of the "liftoff from Moon"? Do you see any plume from the engine, or it run on "invisible" plumes? ... But again, you did not need anything else that your eyes to tell, what is this: http://spaceflight.nasa.gov/gallery/images/apollo/apollo16/hires/as16-122-19533.jpg Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
trodas Posted August 10, 2015 Share Posted August 10, 2015 Comparing Apollo Moon photos to Philae comet photos When comparing the Apollo Moon photos and their supersmooth mountains (about 6km from camera, allegedly, as the Philae was from the comet 67P/Churyumov–Gerasimenko) to the Philae photos of rough terrain on the comet makes one wonder, if there "Moon photos" are not just a background projection. Or are they real? If so, what make the terrain on Moon so smooth? There is no natural way to smooth mountains on the Moon. Mainly because the surface close to the camera is rough, almost as it should be... So you cannot have it both ways. Or can you? Music from Amiga demo Tint by TBL (1996). Enjoy! Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.