Jump to content
HWBOT Community Forums

AMD passion, enthusiasm of FlanK3r, white green power of AMD-AIR cooled!


Recommended Posts

Finally is the day of FX mania.

 

gqnWKV1.jpg

 

HWInfo and information about temps, voltage of first tested chip - this is FX-8300

Ff1rPc0.png

 

At stock is FX-8300 in performance near the older FX-8150. Vishera is better in IPC and specially in games.

 

Cinebench R10 and R11.5

U08TjRh.png

dpmAHGh.png

 

For all benchmarks I used decent OC at 4762-4763 MHz, but this clocks are not full stable I mean. So some average CPU....

4762 MHz benchable OC, Sisoft Sandra

3jj4KKL.png

 

OsoJicl.png

 

6pk8adJ.png

 

srae0uK.png

 

gGVt0DE.png

 

Wprime 1024M with win7 64-bit with 2CU/4C software (not hadware shutdown)

Tm1m785.png

wprime 1024M with 4CU/4C. With software assignment of process

c9s0p2N.png

 

Old one 3D Mark2005, GPU decent OC only

RYVONWA.png

 

AIDA 64 memory bandwith (write, read, copy) at 4763 MHz and 2162 MHz DDR3 RipjawsX

mERoXXg.png

dAfXKh1.png

XF5pnpb.png

 

AIDA CPU Queen

MQ6mthQ.png

 

AIDA 64 Photo

6zkElYN.png

 

AIDA 64 CPU AES

MYSqSpJ.png

 

AMD Overdrive benchmark

XzW4JU8.png

 

Cinebench R10

Oy4Ie3e.png

 

hmmm, new Cinebench R15 at 4763MHz

eL8JK0L.png

 

HWBOT PRIME benchmark

V5yo0jF.png

 

MaxxPI 32M, scaling much better than old x87 superpi :)

35XNyJ7.png

 

Multicore Pi benchmark 4763 MHz

MKApRft.png

 

Nuclearus benchmark

muXqmMp.png

 

One part of ScienceMark

DHNefLu.png

 

Do you know ROG benchmark? He is long, stressed one part very well and including work with photo, video compression and multitasking

jdmK2r6.png

 

 

The maximum

Max Cinebench was able aroud 4815 MHz only :-(. This chip was very hot, but working OK up to 80 C in Coretemp!

LhJZ15z.png

 

Superpi 32M at 4965 MHz

GMzy40d.png

 

And now something about quality of CUs. I tried it with SUperpi 32M and later with validation.

CU1 the best one

PvmZank.png

 

CU2 average

p8RYAMD.png

 

CU3 average

y8yqpMf.png

 

CU4 the worst

d9h4Fyu.png

 

Superpi 1M max was around 5117 MHz and I want not used more than 1.55V for this chips

SNwaMRY.png

 

Validation 5317 Mhz with screenshot :)

7PSfGxk.png

Link to comment
Share on other sites

FX-8320 is second fighter from oldschool batch 1229PGN. I have two 8320 but this one I do not tested before. I can say this one is worse than first one...LLC I set as high, so real voltage was near the CPU-Z info.

 

cT13D48.jpg

 

ROG realbenchmark at 4766 MHz as warmup

FBaj4i9.png

 

AIDA memory and cache around 4900 MHz -warmup 2

PKxIDP4.png

 

X264 FHD benchmark at 4891 MHz and 4930 MHz

3VQjX9A.png

AZjDr5h.png

 

Most of benchmarks I was run at 5037 MHz and CPUNB over 2500 MHz (1.25V)

 

3D Mark06 at 5037 MHz

cIfYd2Z.png

 

3D Mark11 at 5037 MHz

Vznqi7E.png

 

Cinebench R10

pEkqgJp.png

 

HWBot PRIME

G41YXf8.png

 

MaxxPi 32M

yfKrQ4a.png

 

benchmark Nuclearus

BbcYzws.png

 

I love Cinebenchs, R11.5

cZ2WMne.png

 

First time we can see results of Truecrypt benchmark, stressed at 70 C in Coretemp!

0HCpZUN.png

 

Winrar benchmark

uqFS3Ea.png

 

Wprime 32M and 1024M

IIyAcst.png

 

 

Max benchmarks

Superpi maxed around 5162 MHz (32M, 1M I tested not for max)

0FSXZrc.png

usP4yV0.png

 

Max validation after was around 5380 MHz

Link to comment
Share on other sites

So, what do you mean? New FX-9370 and old motherboard? It be working? Yes!

 

Im use for benchtable old and good one Asus Crosshair V Formula. This is really the solid board I think Asus make the best boards for AM3+. Cooling in all setups was AMD Allinone Cooler (Antec 920). Ambients between 20-22 C.

 

gvVygaQ.jpg

 

My FX-9370 is 1311PGN batch. This chip impressed me at begining but not all is so clear...

I began with Cinebench R11.5 at 4940 MHz. What this chip can do?

 

1.44V no problem...

n9Yi5XG.png

 

1.42V? OK!

iNTZMUc.png

 

1.355V!! 4940 MHz

Gg9fuCP.png

 

Cinebench R15 is a bit harder for CPU, I must jumped a bit with voltage

aIKqzxs.png

 

X264FHD benchmark with 4940 MHz and 2600+ CPUNB.

PY1mlaI.png

 

Impossible...CU4 is very bad and higher volts helps not much :-(. This CU4+temps kills all potential of this CPU..After few minutes of test I got hardware error.

mFKYSWj.png

 

With higher CPUNB clocks is CPU more sensitivity for volts, need more juice, limit is near 2800 MHz with 1.35V CPUNB

yClIbus.png

 

Usually, CPUNB 100 MHz lower help in CPU clocks. Cinebench at 5066MHz/2635MHz CPUNB

M3JHSKi.png

 

With this frequency I tried more benchmarks:

 

3D Fire Strike

fWRgXka.png

 

3D Cloud Gate

49CxlpT.png

 

3D Mark11

HrW0Dku.png

 

Fritzchess benchmark, easy over 16 000 points

JdsG5C9.png

 

Cinebench R11.5

LuNLlXH.png

 

Wprime 32M and 1024M

nRqvlK1.png

 

The maximum

 

Cinebench R11.5 at 5143 MHz

r2VTSw0.png

 

Superpi 32M test1 at 5262 MHz

vyDxPOd.png

 

Superpi 32M test2 at 5397 MHz

QvM4fdb.png

 

Superpi 1M at 5470 MHz!

YSaR30p.png

 

Max validation, the best was CU1 (core 0+1) and worst last one CU4. CU3 was similar as CU1. 5647 MHz

oHw8TD6.png

 

hmmm, unvalid try. 5675 MHz (as always 1.555V as my maximum)

M8TEPVR.jpg

Link to comment
Share on other sites

aDqoVx8.jpg

 

And there is it, last one! Flagship of AMD, 9590!

[video=youtube;OXJx-XOBtIM]

 

5 GHz benchmarks

3D Mark11

dzNno6q.png

 

AIDA64 memory and cache benchmark

0up48A1.png

 

AMD Overdrive bench

4oi7Diq.png

 

Cinebench R10

osqGj4G.png

 

Truecrypt

61P7GmN.png

 

Winrar bench

aLuQmos.png

 

x264FHD benchmark

mFDbTqw.png

 

 

Overclocking benchmarks

5142 MHz 3D Mark Fire Strike

fURlmwK.png

 

5142MHz 3D Mark11

X6V6Rap.png

 

5142 MHz ROG real benchmark

FeQcduc.png

 

5242 MHz x264FHD

YCbQCyK.png

 

5242MHz AMD Overdrive benchmark

rNeaRE1.png

 

5242 MHz 3D Mark05

1jyBzCI.png

 

5242 MHz 3D Mark Fire Strike

wCX6nDi.png

 

HT link vs Cinebench score 26xxMHz/28xx MHz/30xx MHz

VKOoVDC.png

VBZNMdb.png

ZBM4f0Q.png

 

We want more! We want AMD enthusiast, ahuuuu!

 

5318 MHz Cinebench R15

n1bIl0q.png

 

5318MHz Fritzchess benchmark

PAkkvr0.png

 

5322 MHz 3D Mark06

c2RosWv.png

 

5322 MHz MaxxPi 32M

FiQboWJ.png

 

5344 MHz Wprime 1.535V

lhY93dR.png

 

5344 MHz Cinebench R15 1.544V 858 points

y49m4XS.png

 

5344 MHz Cinebench R11.5 with 9.16 points

KRlcKvz.png

 

holly FlanK3r! 5371 MHz 1.55V Cinebench R15 run. This is monster chip, I need better cooling!

L8O0aeQ.png

 

5344MHz Cinebench R11.5 second run 9.25!

ZcAu4kE.png

 

The AMD "Spartans" never give up! My R11.5 "air" AMD record 5371 MHz 1.55V and 9.28 points!

dmOGWiv.png

 

5374 MHz HWbot PRIME benchmark

gQeLJGZ.png

 

The next maximus...OK, not in 32M :)

 

Easy, easy with superpi 32M at 5418 MHz

4lOwcGZ.png

 

5445 MHz Superpi 32M, but time is not much good (it was last benchmarks before borrow it back)

VpqcmGd.png

 

5500 MHz Superpi 1M

9ItwWDU.png

 

5554 MHz superpi 1M 1.555V

mZPDZBg.png

 

What about 5580 MHz Superpi 1M 1.555V "air"?:D

?LxzkYf6.png

 

This CPU is madness 5747 MHz

PqDfajU.png

 

5776 MHz CU2

iz1FHhp.png

 

All Core Units can idle at 5747 MHz, this is very good.

 

The best is CU2 (core 2+3)

5833 MHz!!

0xzCHFF.png

http://valid.canardpc.com/j2rf2f

 

 

 

9R0vMXp.jpg

 

 

Hmmm, what missing? Test stability? Ok, there is it:

 

Very nice 1.476V and 5033 MHz

9ZkfI8E.png

 

1.535V for little jump up to 5092 MHz. More is impossible beause to hot for stability. But I found, every from all tested chips was hot else. Most of the chips has the best CU2 and all chips has worst CU4.

rJfNkFD.png

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share

×
×
  • Create New...