pointhore
-
Posts
25 -
Joined
-
Last visited
Content Type
Profiles
Forums
Events
Blogs
Posts posted by pointhore
-
-
There was an announcement yesterday on the main page (xtremesystems.org) about the SSDs, but now even the main page is gone
I guess the switch didn't go as smooth as they were hoping
-
It looks like Nature was never run due to hardware limitations. Check the screenshot.
No Nature = no good.
-
This is a 2.8 in a 2.4b category.
http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=750303
Please move to the correct category
-
why is it a mobile CPU ?
It's not a mobile CPU, but it is in the wrong category.
It should be in the MP 2600+ TB category here http://www.hwbot.org/quickSearch.do?hardwareId=CPU_1133
-
I'm glad the report tool works now, but what do we do about a result that has been checked by a moderator and cannot be reported. The main thread for reporting things like this has been "Closed"
This one is in the wrong category. It is a mobile processor. Look at the screenshot.
http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=635793
Please move it to the correct category.
Thanks
-
I didn't know that. Thanks. :celebration:
-
fixed
At one time the following were able to be verfied on the Wprime website.
http://www.hwbot.org/compare.do?resultId=616055
http://www.hwbot.org/compare.do?resultId=612977
http://www.hwbot.org/compare.do?resultId=612352
http://www.hwbot.org/compare.do?resultId=603271
The software available to us had some bugs in it at that time giving the Invalid checksum response. Of course we can't check them now since the Wprime database can no longer be accessed. You can block these if you want, it's up to you.
P.S. Some of these were already blocked and then reinstated by Massman.
-
I see Sweet is taking care of the invalid/wrong version of Wprime results. You might as well add these to the list.
http://www.hwbot.org/compare.do?resultId=689912 1.58
http://www.hwbot.org/compare.do?resultId=690707 1.58
Both are wrong version. :nana:
-
Any moderators have an answer for me on this?
http://www.hwbot.org/forum/showpost.php?p=15088&postcount=936
Anything yet?
-
Any moderators have an answer for me on this?
http://www.hwbot.org/forum/showpost.php?p=15088&postcount=936
-
I just read over at Bleedinedge that a couple of my benchmarks have been deleted by one of the moderators here.
http://www.bleedinedge.com/forum/showpost.php?p=248016&postcount=1
If I understand correctly, they were deleted because of an Invalid checksum. I can't check because they were deleted. Is this the reason why?
-
This person has a 9000 Series Video card not a 9200Pro
http://www.hwbot.org/quickSearch.do?hardwareId=GPU_933
3Dmark 2001 - 8764 marks - Pointhore (Bleedinedge)
3Dmark 2003 - 1586 marks - Pointhore (Bleedinedge)
Aquamark - 14763 marks - Pointhore (Bleedinedge)
Sorry, my Mistake. It's been fixed.
-
Can you guys take a look at the X1300 256 category. http://www.hwbot.org/quickSearch.do?hardwareId=GPU_428
There are alot of cards with 400+ clocks on the memory. 200 is stock for memory (DDR1) and I am pretty sure DDR1 won't clock that high.
Here are a few that need more proof.
http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=648765
http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=565788
http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=622510
http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=571376 Can't see resolution
http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=635879 No Link or image
http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=569909 these two are definately questionable
-
-
I have to retract some of the comments I made here. Now I notticed that I ran 3DM2006 in 1024 x 768 because the monitor I use for benching (15" AOC) doesn't support 1280x1024 :rotf: As soon as I change my monitor I will return with some 3DMark 2006 action, until than, no 3DMark 2006 results for me
Bring it on! :battle:
-
-
XP2600 Thoroughbred
No screenshot for verification & it says 2600 Mobile it's in the wrong category
http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=627433
No screenshot for verification & it says 2600 Mobile. it's in the wrong category
http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=627425
I have posted these before.
I see you got the top one fixed. Thanks.
The bottom one is still showing up as #1 for the 2600 TB and is also listed for the 2600+ M (no points)
-
XP2600 Thoroughbred
No screenshot for verification & it says 2600 Mobile it's in the wrong category
http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=627433
No screenshot for verification & it says 2600 Mobile. it's in the wrong category
http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=627425
I have posted these before.
-
XP 2600 thoroughbred
No screenhot for verification
http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=627433
No screenhot for verification
http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=627425
This clown doesn't have a screenshot either. lmao
-
http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=573595 this is a 2.4 prescott not a 2.4B
Bug reports : 1st post missing when reading forum posts
in Support
Posted
Ticket ID: 762
Priority: Low
How come alot of the threads started do not have a first post? Some are even missing the first 2.\r\nAre you keeping them a secret or something.