[Ilias83 - A4-5000 @ 1499.6MHz - 1min 27sec 890ms PiFast]

Sygxaritiria! Exeis enan CPU pio argo apo Sempron se SocketA !

http://hwbot.org/submission/2454916_jimmyfox_pifast_sempron_2600_%28thoroughbred%29_1min_11sec_940ms

[Maverick - GeForce GT 620 - 4486 marks 3DMark Vantage - Performance]

Nice score but isn't this a GT620M videocard and not a GT620?

[jorgeeneto - 4x Core i7 3820 @ 3.8MHz - 719 points CineBench R11.5]

719!

 

Impressive!

 

Oh, wait....

 

Nope, just horribly wrong...

[turbobooster - FX-8320 @ 4000MHz - 26027 marks PCMark Vantage]

Isn't this a result of 3DMark Vantage and not PCmark Vantage?

[JimmyFox - Phenom II X6 1100T BE @ 4000MHz - 20min 37sec 384ms Hyper PI 32M]

Thanks!

[JimmyFox - Phenom II X6 1100T BE @ 3314MHz - 24sec 283ms Hyper PI 32M]

You are correct! Thank you.

[POLICE department INTO hwbot?....]

I agree with Mariosalice. If teamwork is not approved, then why are there teams in hwbot?

 

About that thing of publishing the serial number of the hardware.

I think it's at least... insufficient. Users buy and sell their hardware all the time.

Let's say I post the serial number of my A64 X2 4400+. I am rock stable @ 2660MHz. All my benchmarks are run at that frequency. So, let's say I sell this CPU to a friend of mine. He uses water cooling or something else and he achieves a rock stable frequency of 2800MHz and then he posts his results at hwbot. What happens then? I would really like to know. Should I have given him a receipt? How about publishing the receipts from our hardware purchases?