s1ugh34d
-
Posts
15 -
Joined
-
Last visited
Content Type
Profiles
Forums
Events
Blogs
Posts posted by s1ugh34d
-
-
Single Core 557 Multi Core 2818
-
Sorry, didn't even think of the PM, anyhow this is the result,
http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=635655
even in the picture it shows 4.1
-
massman, i got your email. do you want proof that i use 4.1?
An hwbot crew member, Massman, has blocked one of your submitted scores. It has been marked as 'incorrect submission'.
This was the reason the user gave:
This is PiFast 4.3, we use 4.1 !
-
-
http://www.hwbot.org/compare.do?resultId=558788
How does a lower speed CPU and lower clocks on the card, beat even the higher speed CPU, and higher card clocks
-
-
The current CPU's are loosing to the newer AM2CPU's from AMD, all the old rankings can't compete with the DDR2 speeds, and are all loosing there place in rankings, can a AM2 ranking be made???
-
-
no reply?, can anything like that be fixed, is there goingto be a AM2 ranking?
-
The difference inbetween the 32bit and 64bit athlons is sometimes massive. The rankings though, don't all have the accurate 64bit markings on there CPU, this mostly applys to the Sempron catogory. There are scores "verified as correct by a moderator" that clearly say x86-64 in the screenshot, and are under the 32bit rankings. Personally i know of a few scores that are AM2 as well and still fall under the old 64 or stock scores, thus pushing olderhardware out of there own rankings. Is anything planned for AM2 ranking alone, so that the old ranking for Sempron and Athlon64 have there own space, having memory run near twice as fast as the old stuff it really improves scores, and really pushes the old hardware out of there spots.
Could anyone let me know what going on in the system so i can find out when any updatefor AM2 and any moderation for 64bit vs 32bit scores.
-
I say sluggy freelance
$SOLID$ Necro - Ryzen 9 5950X @ 5350.2MHz - 5min 31sec 978ms SuperPi - 32M with BenchMate
in Result Discussions
Posted