[backeru - Core 2 P7450 (2.13Ghz) @ 2298.1MHz - 2298.1 mhz CPU-Z]

well, didn't saw the pictury, sorry.

But the comment tells the link shows 2,3GHz and it shows 861 MHz.

 

But it doesnt't really matter ^^

[backeru - Core 2 P7450 (2.13Ghz) @ 2298.1MHz - 2298.1 mhz CPU-Z]

Freq : 861.71 MHz (287.24 * 3)

 

This is what I see at the link??

I think you got to bench it again.

[Christian Ney - K7S5A - 146.69 MHz Reference Clock]

freakin unbelieveable xDD

 

I need a OC Tool with KHz adjustment

[BenchBruno - Athlon XP 2000+ Thorton @ 2667MHz - 58sec 688ms wPrime 32m]

Thank you, it is an other one. But she didn't make more cpu clock than your

[HWBOT Rev.4 - The Plan.]

The best score only gives score for the team : I don't like it that much as well, I don't see how it will prevent for Sharing as I am not sure that most of the members care about the team but more about their own personal amount of points

 

I also think so.

Well it looks often like the HW is given through the team, but I think they do it just for their personal amount of Points and not for the team points.

I think the sharing is often between Team Members because this are the people that know each other. So giving just one time Team Points will not end this.

[HWBOT Rev.4 - The Plan.]

Well, I think it's not good to split +0 and -0.

 

If you look at a processor with ~30 competitors.

If 15 participants bench +0 and 15 participants -0, there will be not much Points for this processor anymore.

 

And for example at most Socket A processors there are not much -0 participants. So there will be not much points for benching them subzero -> no motivation.

 

 

 

Another problem would be to proof that the result was made +0.

At some Processors you can see easily (Core i7 6GHz etc.)

but if you look at Socket A processors for example, some processors can reach frequencies under air/water easily that other chips need dice for.

 

Example:

 

http://hwbot.org/community/submission/1035565_benchbruno_cpu_z_athlon_xp_2500_barton_2785.4_mhz

(Dice, not good chip)

 

http://hwbot.org/community/submission/1042927_benchbruno_cpu_z_athlon_xp_2500_barton_2817.65_mhz

(water cooling, good chip)

 

there are even more extreme examples; I've seen ~3,3GHz Barton submissions with air cooling.

 

I hope I understood the new things right and I hope you understand my english

[I.nfraR.ed - Athlon XP 2500+ Barton @ 2690.3MHz - 57sec 907ms wPrime 32m]

Nice !

Hope i will beat this

[BenchBruno - Athlon XP 2000+ Thorton @ 2530MHz - 41sec 500ms SuperPi]

Good luck, your CPU seems to be good

[Eiswolf93 - Phenom II X2 555 BE @ 6209MHz - 4min 12sec 20ms wPrime 1024m]

Nice work

[Eiswolf93 - Phenom II X2 555 BE @ 6373MHz - 7sec 768ms wPrime 32m]

Nice Mate

 

[Turrican - i486SX-25Mhz @ 25MHz - 13h 20min 52sec 32ms wPrime 32m]

Nice time ;D

 

 

[GO-OPS - Core 2 E6600 (2.4Ghz) @ 4080.9MHz - 4080.9 mhz CPU-Z]

Good work

[Turrican - Athlon 1000Mhz (Fsb 133) @ 1610MHz - 87.03 sec PiFast]

You got a Backup everytime, damn

 

I hope this was the last one

[BenchBruno - Athlon 1000Mhz (Fsb 133) @ 1591MHz - 87.17 sec PiFast]

Special thanks to Alriin

[Barisan - Athlon XP 2600+ Barton @ 2505.8MHz - 2505.83 mhz CPU-Z]

By the old Socket A processors (z.B. Athlon XP), CPU-Z often read only the family affiliation, but not the individual.

[BenchBruno - Duron 750Mhz @ 1188MHz - 1min 25sec 125ms SuperPi]

I think he means the Competition in the PCGHX Forum ^^

I will join this Competition, but with some other CPU

 

BTW: This RAM was from anselm`s father,

A little bit better as the other one but still not good ^^

Thank you Alriin

[Alriin - Athlon II X3 435 @ 4931MHz - 5min 22sec 687ms wPrime 1024m]

Nice work^^

 

[BenchBruno - Duron 1.6ghz @ 2602.6MHz - 2602.55 mhz CPU-Z]

 

 

[BenchBruno - Duron 1.6ghz @ 2602.6MHz - 2602.55 mhz CPU-Z]

Gekühlt mit Eis, Schnee und Salz im Wasser ^^

Der Wasserkühler war mit gefrorenem Kondenswasser voll

[HWBoints Adjustment #2: HwPoint Motivation]

Well i voted yes, too.

It's an improvement to what it was before, but i think the points are still a bit too low.

 

Thank you for listening to the wishes and ideas of the community.

[Rev3 Up and Running - Complaints, Ideas, Ramblings, Comments ... but no bugs]

What about a combination of rev3 and rev2? For 20 or less results the rev2-Point-System and everything above using the new system.

 

So everything would be fine. Popular hardware will be rewarded much and unpopular also a little bit but not too less....

 

I think this would be a very good Idea.

I would be very pleased if you think about this, and give this Idea a chance.

[Rev3 Up and Running - Complaints, Ideas, Ramblings, Comments ... but no bugs]

I dislike the new rev.

 

The Idea to give often benched Hardware more Points is basically not bad, but for example it's not worth to bench any Old hardware (e.g. Athlon 1200MHz)

If my Result is under the 3rd Rank, i just get 0,1PTS.

There is no Motivation to improve e.g. from Rank 20 to 10, because i will just get 0,1pts.

I like Benching old HW and in Rev3 its just a waste of time.

 

I lost the most of my Points, and if the System stays the same I think i will give up benching.