[Uncertainty submitting to GeForce 8100/8200 IGP category]

Alright, thanks! Will put them into the 8200 category as suggested.

[Uncertainty submitting to GeForce 8100/8200 IGP category]

Haven't posted much in the forums, so I hope my choice of the support subforum is adequate for this type of question.

I'm a little puzzled with a piece of hardware I just tested, in particular an ECS GF8100VM-M5 board.
As the name of the Board and the vendor itself suggest, this seems to be an AM2+/AM3 Board with the GeForce 8100 as onboard GPU.

However 3DMark Systeminfo, CPU-Z and GPU-Z all show the GeForce 8200 and on further inspection there doesn't seem to be much of a difference between the two. Techpowerups data sheets (GF8100 / GF8200) also show no real difference.

Removing the boards heatsink also didn't yield much in terms of information as I can't find anything in regard to the IDs on the NV chip.

While ultimately a minor issure, I figured it's worth asking before I submit my scores to the 8100 category and stand the chance to have them flagged,
since most of the software shows a GeForce 8200, with only the CPU-Z motherboard tab suggesting otherwise.

  

[Saturas - Core i7 950 @ 4824.5MHz - 7min 47sec 455ms SuperPi - 32M]

Chaotic but not too bad overall I guess  - Testing the waters with Dice for the first time after 10 years.
Happy new year and I hope you're doing great  .

[[WTB][EU] DDR2: Crucial 10th Anniversary PC2-5300 & Corsair Dominator PC2-8888]

I figured in my pursuit of older kits, my chances wouldn't be too bad asking here.

The title says it all, I am looking for two very specific kits of DDR2. 
One set of Crucial 10th Anniversary and a kit of Corsair Dominator ONLY in the 8888C4 variant.

I know both kits are D9, but in this case OC is not a priority, so if they don't clock very well, I don't care
Most important would be for them to be in a visually good state, with HS, no massive scratches, etc.

I am based in Germany, so feel free to offer from around the world, but ideally with a rough estimate for shipping cost.

[Saturas - Xeon Gold 5120T @ 2594MHz - 14.774 fps HWBOT x265 Benchmark - 4k]

Better late than never! Thanks and good to see you are still around :)

[[fs] fx-55 (cabce 0516wpmw)]

--SOLD--

 

Hi,

 

got an AMD chip for sale, FX-55 CABCE 0516WPMW .

From what I've seen the CABCE's seem to be quite good for LN2.

Sadly I don't have anything here to test subzero right now, so this one is for sale.

 

Max. Valid with H²0 was 3315MHz on my chip.

Water was cooled by a chiller, no low temperatures used though (14 to 15°C watertemp).

 

price: 30€ + shipping (depends on method and country, envelope should be around 6€)

item location: germany

payment: international bank transfer preferred, paypal possible

 

Edit: I'm sorry, I just noticed that I'm missing the picture with name etc. ... so, well, here it is:

The other picture attached to the post is a formal version which probably offers better readability of the batch etc.

[Big Mess in Intel GMA Sections]

On paper it is. In real life benching, it isn't. I might go for that if you gave me WR points for my mobile runs.

So a separate category please. Thanks.

 

If the spec sheet is in fact the same, then wouldn't it be just giving you twice the points for benching one card with a faster cpu (i.e. desktop) and a slower one (notebook) ?

 

That would be like giving out seperate points for benching a HD7970 with Intel i7 and Intel Core 2.

The GPU would be the same, you just want points for benching with a slower CPU, that doesn't make sense.

 

This only applies if both GPUs are identical.

 

As usual notebook gpus differ from their desktop alternatives I do understand the seperate category.

If this isn't the case with the HD3k/4k/5k then those categories you're asking for would be absolutely unneccesary.