LeGaL^CriMeR
-
Posts
67 -
Joined
-
Last visited
Content Type
Profiles
Forums
Events
Blogs
Posts posted by LeGaL^CriMeR
-
-
I wish luck to all, I have no nerve to do.
-
While pass super pi, asking lower timings from CPU-TWEAKER!!! Something is unclear how a mouse click!
-
While pass super pi, asking lower timings from CPU-TWEAKER!!!
Something is unclear how a mouse click!
-
While pass super pi, asking lower timings from CPU-TWEAKER!!!
Something is unclear how a mouse click!
-
You'll get a normal result, deceiving to those where to delete them and stay on 1 spot;)
-
OMG:) the race has become a lie and cheat;)
Definitely should be considered for new rules by the MSI
-
OMG:) the race has become a lie and cheat;)
Definitely should be considered for new rules by the MSI
-
Rather oc genie stops XMP profiles!
And my memory is XMP but always stay off when you set the BIOS default and otsgenie
-
No no no, the fallacy of using OC genes, which shows you the wrong result 197x21 = 4137
Your actual score is 197x18 = 3536.
So come Dock in Windows pressing the + button several times current show, the frequency of the first screen that is 197x21 = 4137. If you do not touch the + button will show in windows 197x18 = 3536.
Can not get such a result as you and other colleagues with similar.
No correlation seen the video yet!
Here they got
Quote:
Originally Posted by LapinouX
Look my new post an new video you see all of process without touch button.
Maximum see : 4.41Ghz (210*21) but no windows boot with this frequency.
After i obtain different CPU frequency with different memory stick.
( HyperX, HyperX Genesis, HyperX T1, Ripjaws and RipjawsX).
Do not talk nonsense, that other memory is done differently and multipler FSB,
In JEDEC all memory are identical 9-9-9-24 666mhz
-
No no no, the fallacy of using OC genes, which shows you the wrong result 197x21 = 4137
Your actual score is 197x18 = 3536.
So come Dock in Windows pressing the + button several times current show, the frequency of the first screen that is 197x21 = 4137. If you do not touch the + button will show in windows 197x18 = 3536.
Can not get such a result as you and other colleagues with similar.
No correlation seen the video yet!
Here they got
Look my new post an new video you see all of process without touch button.Maximum see : 4.41Ghz (210*21) but no windows boot with this frequency.
After i obtain different CPU frequency with different memory stick.
( HyperX, HyperX Genesis, HyperX T1, Ripjaws and RipjawsX).
Do not talk nonsense, that other memory is done differently and multipler FSB,
In JEDEC all memory are identical 9-9-9-24 666mhz
-
No no no, the fallacy of using OC genes, which shows you the wrong result 197x21 = 4137
Your actual score is 197x18 = 3536.
So come Dock in Windows pressing the + button several times current show, the frequency of the first screen that is 197x21 = 4137. If you do not touch the + button will show in windows 197x18 = 3536.
Here they got!
-
Looking for mods almost all night and nothing, OC GENIE outcome is not affected by what will be the start of the CPU (cold or additional) read 12 reviews for OC GENIE, and everywhere regardless of CPU overclocking is about 30% -37.4% .
These two results which have been uploaded, with over 45% overclock is just to limit the potential of BCLK (+) button. I hope as MASSMAN and MSI to review everything carefully.
Even if they try to make such a% overclock with this motherboard.
-
Tomorrow we will get new results are completely normal.
Today arrived my memory and I hope now everything is fine. I think to test until the morning and upload the results.
And here they beauties:)
-
It would not be bad to look at and in the Facebook page. penultimate clip, and he is i7 860, and OC GENIE clock it the same way 210x18.
Jump two participants made the whole competition for laughter.
EDIT:
Video of LapinouX's, not shown CPU-Z (memory) and CPU-Z (SPD)
-
OMG 2 result the same , how to overclock i7 860 up to 4Ghz ?
Used mod or cheat ? i don`t understand
-
There are but a dashboard
-
I did my work, to include OC GENIE launch of 18x210.
With the help of BCLK buttons, the CPU goes just as much as "clon22" fsb-223.45. With one (1) step up and blue screen.
I think the rules we should have a ban in the BIOS of BCLK buttons. To not like me and others to doubt the ability of a OCGENIE.
-
OC cable panel is folded and does not see well edali was hooked. So please make a new video being shot and the rear of the board. I'm sure the mod is on the board or the CPU but can not prove.
-
Guess what.
After pressing the OCGENIE the system and need time to be included.
Dock is a black screen, the man watching her post the numbers of separate remote control. And before you include screen and it rebooted and set manually from BCLK OC controller. Therefore we see the result only by showing the image on the monitor.
My result and another colleague posted in OCGENIE contest with the same processor, and we have such success by nearly 50% overclock!
-
or has done any mod on the bottom or the CPU
-
maybe used OC Dashboard that comes with the motherboard
-
maybe used OC Dashboard that comes with the motherboard
-
impossible as I wrote earlier, the same CPU overclocking them differently!
-
will use a memory sandy motherboards which is low voltage (kingston), but will it flash with firmware of g.skill, I think that is not prohibited?
I'll try to days to show new results without the other pictures and presenter.
johnamd - Core i5 680 @ 4767.5MHz - 8min 42sec 383ms SuperPi 32m
in Result Discussions
Posted
You use a program to reduce the timing!