Jump to content
HWBOT Community Forums

Barron_Greenback

Members
 View Profile  See their activity

  • Posts

    24

  • Joined

  • Last visited

 Content Type 

Posts posted by Barron_Greenback

    Reported scores not being checked

    in Submission & member moderation

    Posted

    No it's not. The theme issue comes up when you close explorer and svchost. After a while, the theme service starts again and it happens that certain windows don't get the new theme.

     

    Score is valid.

     

    Well, i've never had the issue you mention with svhosts. I dont believe the result is a cheat, but i would bet next weeks wages that its photoshopped.

    My Deleted '06 Quad SLi score

    in Submission & member moderation

    Posted

    Sorry mate, i dont :-( It was not a top20 score, so according to the rules, i dont need one.

     

    Thats my issue here, the mods see fit to just delete results without even telling me, just because they "think" that i've used disable PP. They have no proof of this, and on the other hand I have no proof that I didn't disable PP.

     

    Im not gonna argue the toss here its not worth the hassle.

     

    Thanks for your time mods for looking into this for me :)

    I have to ask

    in Submission & member moderation

    Posted

    If you use enough i-rams/ssd'd then it will be poss... Using XP will dent the score thou + there is no validation link or score break down visable in the screen shot so its hard to tell.

     

    I can score 16.5k using an E2180@3.8ghz, so im gonna say its valid.

    AquaMark Validation....

    in Submission & member moderation

    Posted

    This is fine by me, and exactly how I thought things would be.. Just seems strange that in all my time on hwbot, I've never had a score reported, but in the last 2 hours I've had 2 Aquamark scores reported by hwbot mods.

     

    The first was checked and passed by jmke, and the 2nd blocked by klopcha. Just want all of the mods to be singing off the same hymn sheet when both of my results were exactly the same as regards validation.

     

    In my eyes it's one rule for everybody, so in which case if my result stays blocked, I have no problem, so long as the results listed in my first post are also removed.

     

    Im not trying to cause trouble here, just want to know where i stand.

     

    Thanks again,

     

    Rich.

    AquaMark Validation....

    in Submission & member moderation

    Posted

    Seen as Im getting scores blocked due to 'insufficient verification for rankings', thought i'd have a look around for myself.

     

    The following need addressing :-

     

    http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=680633

    http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=728248

    http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=698212

    http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=709494

    http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=699937

    http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=701472

    http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=679390

    http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=677885

     

    Thats just a quick run down from the top 20 in Single card and SLI...

     

    I know some of the results have validation links, but going by the information in the Aquamark thread on the hwbot.org homepage, these results are still INVALID.

     

    I draw your attenttion to this inormation on the front page... :-

     

    Aquamark submission rules updated

    "As of today, aquamark03 submissions are required to have a valid screenshot which contains a screencapture of the aquamark result, cpu-z with processor tab (and preferrable memory tab too) and gpu-z (or rivatuner in case of gpu-z failure to dedect hardware properly) open.

     

    Future aquamark submissions which do not include this information may be blocked without further notice. We’re sorry for the inconvenience but we can not moderate reported submissions properly if this vital information is missing."

×
×
  • Create New...