OverDozeD
-
Posts
24 -
Joined
-
Last visited
Content Type
Profiles
Forums
Events
Blogs
Posts posted by OverDozeD
-
-
What exactly are you typing?
maybe it's new hardware and isn't added yet to database
-
Good point. I`ll try to check this more carefully.
From 20/01/09 there is the rule about 3Dmark subtest window and everybody mast follow the rule.
Yes mylord!
Promise not to give you any kind of work on my submissions next time
relax take it easy
ok, i'll do so
Thread closed!
-
No Comments any more
give it up Gio
make better screens next time
you are discussing with GODs
OMG
No, sorry, OMhwmods
OK, done
Next time I'll do rock solid screens, even GODs cant block'em
-
yes we are gods, because we try to moderate fair. and fair moderation puts us into god-mode;)
One note, God never tries
And proving that some1 is unmistakable is simply an nonsence
just 4 fun
-
I don't like it
there's no point to add it imho
If any1 can vmod brosers plz share it
-
also a bug in Vista with 3D03;)
Weird, but I had no problem with 03 in vista64 home basic version
-
@Massman
OverDozeD, don't try to mess with us just because your score was blockedActually I didn't think of to mess with you:)
I don't care about score, that was good lesson for me
but the question was quite serious, not kiddin or smth like that.
thx 4 reply
-
* gpu-z in screenshot, dropdown must be visible if you run in SLI so all videocards are identified. Rivatuner may be used if GPU-Z fails to identify videocard properly (as of 8 oct 2007)
According the rules, If I use crossfireX dropdown isn't neccesary?
-
The one and only reason of blocking your scores is non-compliance with the rules Please stop unfounded accusing me of preconception. I had never blocked any result based on nationality of the bencher. You are making a big mistake, accusing me of such things.
http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=803127
This score has been submitted _before_ new edition of the rules. Please read the rules carefully at least one time!
OK, whatever... go and keep working, you have a lot to do...
I'm sorry guys if I made any kind of unfounded accusing, I really don't wanted do that.
I just read new changes in rules and everything is clear now
anyway my results deserves to be a valid IMHO.
-
I can think of a lot of submissions without score breakdowns.
I know what's reason of it
demiurg is russian and just gets annoyed when georgan team makes any good result!
Actually that's the reason for deleting.
-
Actually I run vista64 home basic version without ANY tweaks
and answer on this validation please
http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=803127
I believe that a score that has some minor problems with the screenshot will still be valid - but only if the score is normal for the HWGeForce GTX 260 216 @ 756/1264mhz
i7 920 @ 42000 mhz
2000 mhz CL7
I think that's quite normal settings for 32002 score @ 3Dmark 2005
-
The subtest scores are missing
What you can tell about this?
http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=803127
It's unfair IMHO
There's clearly shown 3Dmark score!
-
What did I wrong in these 2 submissions?
http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=833773
http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=833771
2009-03-29 06:12:24.0 - (crew) demiurg: insufficient verification for rankings (Please provide more verification. The submission must clearly show 3Dmark score, 3Dmark subtest scores, 3Dmark settings unless you provide a futuremark orb link. See http://www.hwbot.org/hwbot.post.do?postId=1038)Why should I provide valid ORB link?
If u cant see CLEAR 3DMark score it's ONLY your problem!
-
i cannot run
it needs DX8
west
I run it without any problems and compatibility mode
vista32 SP1
i used directX web update
but agree with Turrican, it's WAY slower than XP.
-
Few days ago was request for VGA -- GTS 250 with validation link by ANuB1S, but seems it's not added yet.
When it will be added?
-
I repeat that...
IT WAS NOT MISTAKE OF WESTSIDER
IT WAS ORDINARY BUG OF GPUZ, EVERYTHING WAS MADE ACCORDING TO RULES!!!
AND YOU SHOULD KEEP IN YOUR MIND THAT IT'S NORMAL THAT SOMETIMES GPUZ CANT SHOW NORMAL CLOCKS WHEN SYSTEM IS OCed
I've got a lot such examples, and I just can't belive that you hear this first time
jmke
I didn't expected this from you - Famous hardware tester - "Making a mistake is human" << what about bugs of software??
Poor HWBOT moderators... they are left so few, and the worst part of overall, unfortunatelly...
When your WR is deleted unfairly you also become agressive
-
one has to give respect in order to get respect, let me know how many results you have checked on the HWbot since your first visit?
either rephrase your sentences to show respect to those who help keep a clean database, or prepare to receive no respect from us.
I'm not moderator on this forum and I don't check others results here at all, It's not my job
Agree with you about clean databases
I've seen pics of hardware and screenshots westsider had used there, and there was only single 3870 GDDR4 OC-ed with crazy clocks and lot of fans, It's pity to loose WR result.
If you were at westsider's place you would do the same as he.
Ok no matter what's done
-
westsider
Yes but somehow they also should understand you.
OK no matter what happened, maybe It serves you right for future benches
and hope that benchmarks developers improves bugs of the softwares we use here
-
It was dedicated 2 westsider not you, and I'm not goin 2 explain it's content here.
I've told you everything I thought above
And it's a shame on HWBOT are such kind of "discussions"
p.s. I don't care much of It's consideration at all
Only one question hardware master, the fact that you can't differ single GPU from a double one, It's considered too polite here?
-
demiurg
NEXT TIME BE MORE CAREFUL WITH YOUR DECISSIONS MAN!!!
And if you aren't experienced enough in overclocking better to ask someone who does!
This is fair play not a polygon for WAR!!!
ps. ზურა მიდი მიაწექი, ამათი უჯიშო...
Website Errors
in General overclocking
Posted
Can any1 answer why is this 2'nd place?
Seems,this is another site bug