Bartmasta
-
Posts
80 -
Joined
-
Last visited
Content Type
Profiles
Forums
Events
Blogs
Posts posted by Bartmasta
-
-
the 2 suggestions about the point algorythm
-
when are the suggestions getting implemented btw
-
guys I've noticed the your points have changed thing in your profile is gone now. Why did it get removed? i wanna see how I got more points.
-
-
thats what i meant
-
-
can i take a pic of my rig instead because it has a nice case
-
ok thanks, how long do you think till this gets fixed?
-
so can I get this fixed or do I have to bench again?
-
unfortunately I can't find the .wps file I used
-
hey I have a bug
my wprime 32m submission isnt getting any points because it says it's not my best submission for the cpu but that's not true
http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=906592&tab=info
same for
-
hey I have a bug
my wprime 32m submission isnt getting any points because it says it's not my best submission for the cpu but that's not true
http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=906592&tab=info
same for
-
-
hey I have a bug
my wprime 32m submission isnt getting any points because it says it's not my best submission for the cpu but that's not true
http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=906592&tab=info
same for
-
oh I didn't know you can submit rejected scores, thanks!
-
No I oced all cores and I also tried 1.53.1 and still rejected
-
this benchmark is such a POS no matter what I do my validation will be invalid
-
not only does it say my validation is invalid http://valid.canardpc.com/show_oc.php?id=920739
but when i try to submit the other cpuz files it counts it as the same file
-
how to do it with less cores?
-
like people said the gap is too big
first 1,5 points ok fine
2nd 1,2 points ok
and the 3rd suddenly gets 0,1?
so 2nd place takes work but 3rd is no effort at all?
and if you say well then try to get 2nd place well too bad i dont have i7 sorry
-
sorry for the double post but what I still think is a problem is how theres a huge difference in points between something and 0.1
for example 9600 gt 1GB in 3d vantage
1.5
1.2
0.1
0.1
0.1
I think it should be more like
1.5
1.2
0.7
0.3
0.1
-
I respect the admins for working hard on rev 3 but you can't just say, we thought about this and no one used the test server so we're not changing it, to bad for you
people here are giving good ideas on how to improve rev 3 and you just sit and say, it's fine, learn to bench
EDIT: I just noticed that the system has been tweaked a bit. thanks!
-
that's probably at least 5 people now that chose to stop benching because of the new rev
-
How much results have you submit after Rev3 was launched?
0
why is this relevant
41 people replied in this thread. incl MM, RB, and others who reported bugs.20.000 people using HWbot.
=0.2%
everyone.
that's just being ignorant
no checksum or screenshot of score
in Submission & member moderation
Posted
http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=939092&tab=info
theres no checksum or screenshot showing the score and I think the score is a bit off so it's invalid