Jump to content
HWBOT Community Forums

RoccoESA

Members
 View Profile  See their activity

  • Posts

    109

  • Joined

  • Last visited

 Content Type 

Posts posted by RoccoESA

    wrong category - shift please

    in Submission & member moderation

    please fix:

    in Submission & member moderation

    Posted · Edited by RoccoESA

    the score must into the category "3x 3870" and not in the category "3x 3870X2"

    Yellow - du kannst das doch selber ändern - du musst den Eintrag editieren - dabei kannst du auf 3x 3870 umstellen

     

     

    das ist das selbe / it's the same

     

    Question:

    is a Score with 5870 and 5970 in the Crossfire with 3 x 5870 correct posted? 2pcs 5870 GPU has the 5970 ...[/Quote]

    Answer:

    The most correct way to submit them is to put them in the 3x5870 category .[/Quote]

    blocked because of to high score

    in Submission & member moderation

    Posted

    sorry - I saw too late

    If the score is bugged (high), it will be taken down at some point. It's easy to compare your score to the others, and see if the result is reasonable. In your case it looks quite a bit too high.

     

    Could 128mhz pcie explain it, perhaps?

     

    did not have enough dice around to hold the clock 4 making a screen - i have benched with higher gpu-clock ...

    but please we leave that now - it should not concern my score here

    blocked because of to high score

    in Submission & member moderation

    Posted

    apology - you understand my - that is not anything personal

    I did not address you at all... i have not say "thor is bad" ;)

     

    you have mean score pointed out - I have explain the emergence the worth.

     

    I announced score without picture and validation - and the crew says "is a old score" - not "is buggy" ... ma score is buggy - not "old" ...

     

    Und jetzt müsst ihr euch das mal übersetzen:

     

    Ich kann die Echtheit nicht mehr beweisen, da die Hardware nicht mehr existiert. Also habe ich Pech gehabt - trotz Screen,auf demja nun alles drauf ist.

    Aber darum geht es mir nicht! Es geht mir nicht um MEINEN Score.

    Nicht ich - sondern Thor hat meinen Score hier eingebracht.

     

    Ich wollte lediglich wissen, nach welchem Maß hier gemessen wird und diese Frage wurde beantwortet:

    just look at the other results in this category, it is as simple as that to know if the bench is buged or not [/Quote]

     

    Wenn man sich etwas nicht erklären kann, ist es falsch ...

     

    Jetzt weiß ich es.

    blocked because of to high score

    in Submission & member moderation

    Posted

    talkin about this score? http://www.hwbot.org/community/submission/889280_roccoesa_3dmark_2006_geforce_8800_ultra_24469_marks

     

    just look at the other results in this category, it is as simple as that to know if the bench is buged or not ;)

     

     

     

    !!! it concerns to me not my score !!!

     

    but if you already ask: my dyce was everything - I had to reduce the clock of the graphicscard by the screen to make before the PC freezes - sorry, i have not sponsor, sorry for my financial emergency.if I would have registered other clock rates than in the gpu-z screen, it would have been also not correct.

    but no role I plays cannot the test anyway not repeat, i have not a board which can 128mhz pcie...

     

    leave it, as it is

     

    !!! it concerns to me not my score !!!

     

    the small user has here anyway no chance against the league of LN2 - and if it passed nevertheless times it "buggy"

    PC-Mark05 --> regulate outdated

    in Member Discussions

    Posted · Edited by RoccoESA

    Ever since the 220mb/s limit was made (to prevent scores from "fake" harddrives - that don't display the real performance of the pc, either) people have been limited by it. Removing it is unfair, no matter how good today's HW is. I can understand it's frustrating that you have to make your HW underperform, but at least the rules are equal for all - not just the ones posting scores today, but also for those who posted yesterday;)

     

    HWBot isn't all about the highest tech, you know... it's just as much about older gear.

     

    you understand me wrongly

     

    I am not frustrated - i make simply new score with slowdown ssd ...

     

    next Generation with SATA3 ? pitch had? Its not unfair?

    you talk again and again about old results - it is not just as unreasonably as a i5 to permit around those a scores Pentium-user not to endanger

     

    my results are not importantly - I make this 4 fun ...

     

    hwbot must go with the time ...

     

     

     

    edit

    personal note:

    HDD gerneral Usage 500+MB/s and slow down the HDD for Startup is manipulate the (sub-)result - and this is cheating for validity

    PC-Mark05 --> regulate outdated

    in Member Discussions

    Posted · Edited by RoccoESA

    to exclude and current systems?

    PCMark®05 is everything you need to reliably and easily measure the performance of your PC and determine its strengths and weaknesses. With PCMark05, you will be able to select the optimal upgrades for your existing PC, or choose the right new PC that fits your specific needs[/Quote]

     

    Is not a "Nostalgie- Bench" - today's standard-hw can carry more out as specs.

     

    those asks should nevertheless probably read "so people who benched it today and tomorrow don't get beaten because of a rule change"

     

    HWBOT is a forum from yesterday?

    or today, or tomorrow or the day after tomorrow ...

     

    the HW becomes ever more efficient - there one cannot hold to old rituals

    you changed specs for dual-gpu-card - 4 more fairness - this is the same.

     

    do not forget please: today's standard-hw can carry more out as specs

     

    slow down the SSD (is no problem) falsify the result - is not the real performanceindex from the pc

     

     

     

    and which "older" hdd can do 200+ MB/s ...

×
×
  • Create New...