[HWBOT Translation - FRENCH // Français]

Nothing done...

 

What do i need to do for it to move ?

[Videocard specifications requests : Problem with 82852 and 82855 sections]

No news ?

[Videocard specifications requests : Problem with 82852 and 82855 sections]

Good link, I didn't found it when I searched.

 

So the next step is to apply the changes no ?

[Videocard specifications requests : Problem with 82852 and 82855 sections]

Who will make the decision ?

Do I need to do something ?

[Videocard specifications requests : Problem with 82852 and 82855 sections]

Sorry, I didn't phrase it correctly.

 

I think it's a good idea to merge it, but i also think that a category for 852GM (clocked at 133MHz) has to be created (since it's the only one different).

[Videocard specifications requests : Problem with 82852 and 82855 sections]

My problem is not for the user to identify his chipset, but for someone to recognize it in an hwbot screen.

 

Everest is not needed to post a screen, so how can we know that a score is from a 852 or a 855 ?

852GM is simple, 133Mhz at graphics and fsb100, but 852GME is fsb 133.

And most 855 are used with fsb100 cpus...

 

So what can guide you to tell which chipset is it ?

[Videocard specifications requests : Problem with 82852 and 82855 sections]

Ticket ID: 1199

 

Priority: Medium

 

Hello\r\n\r\nI benched an old laptop with intel graphics and tried to know the exact name of it, but couldn\'t with gpuz. So I searched the results on the base and found that gpuz screens in 82852 category and 82855 category are nearly identical (in the screens I saw, even the device id is identical).\r\n\r\nI searched a bit and found that 852GM seems only to run at 133 MHz, 852GME and 855GME at 133, 200 or 250MHz (in Intel specs). So it is a bit messy...\r\n\r\nSo can you look at it a little ? (is it possible to identify with gpuz ?)\r\n\r\nIf it impossible, why not make it in one category ?

[HWBOT Translation - FRENCH // Français]

Les traductions sont bonnes pour moi.

 

J'envoie le fichier .txt que j'avais fini mais oublié d'envoyer. x)

 

Les fautes sont toujours là...

[HWBOT Translation - FRENCH // Français]

No answers or changes after two weeks...

 

Are we in the appropriate section for a such a request ?

 

If not, could someone tell where it needs to be ?

[HWBOT Translation - FRENCH // Français]

Hello

 

I use the french page and I want it in nearly full French.

And without errors...

"Accueil" (=Home) is still "Acceuil"

"Caractéristiques matériel" is still "Caract�ristiques mat�riel"

 

 

For translation :

"A propos d'HWBOT" for "About HWBOT"

"Ligue Overclockeurs" for "Overclockers League"

"Maîtres du Matériel" for "Hardware Masters"

"Records HWBOT" for "HWBOT Records"

in the tab titles :

"Nouvelles" (ou "Brèves") for "News"

"Nouvelles soumissions" for "New submissions"

"Vidéos" for "Videos"

 

Do french speakers agree with my translations ?

 

Is it possible to translate more ? (for example in the videos tab)

[Rev3 Up and Running - Complaints, Ideas, Ramblings, Comments ... but no bugs]

Good job for this bug correction.

I think less people will complain about the 0.1pts problem (which still here).

 

But I think a 60% of rewarded scores in little categories (with decrease by the number of submissions) is a solution to the matter of a lot of people.

[Rev3 Up and Running - Complaints, Ideas, Ramblings, Comments ... but no bugs]

If you look at the same rank, that's not true. The best 50% get HW boints, so 7th and 12th should get the same 0.1 boints, but 5th will give a bit more.

50% get HW boints ?

by HW boints, you mean more than 0.1pts, do you ?

so why in a categorie with 73 scores, the 25th has only 0.1pts (and the 24th has 1.7pts...) ?

[Videocard specifications requests : Quadro FX1000]

Ticket ID: 292

 

Priority: Medium

 

Can you add the Nvidia Quadro FX1000 please ?\r\n\r\n

[Jmax Hardware Bench Party]

Summary of all rules (contains updates):

http://hwbot.org/hwbot.post.do?postId=1038

 

Updates :

http://hwbot.org/searchNews.do?title=rules

 

Please keep in mind we do not block for the fun of it. We try only to block when a submission is not 100% according to the rules and it has been reported or is suspicious, or is in the top 20.

 

It's not what I was looking for.

 

Is there a page with all changes of rules in all benchmarks ?

 

I'm not clear.

It needs an exemple.

 

I've seen this score http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=547993 which is for me suspicious and has a lack of validation.

But how can I know what were the exact rules in 2006 ?

[Jmax Hardware Bench Party]

Is there a page with all the modifications and dates of application for the rules of hwbot ?

 

(which can add help in this kind of case)

[Feature requests : Separate HD2600 pro GDDR2 and GDDR3]

Ticket ID: 277

 

Priority: Medium

 

Hello\r\n\r\nIs it possible to separate GDDR2 and GDDR3 results for the HD2600 pro ?\r\n\r\nthere is a big difference in performance (one with memory at 500, max 600, and the other at 700 min)

[Problem with 3d06 8400M GS scores]

Ok

I will use an external screen

 

thanks for your answers

[Problem with 3d06 8400M GS scores]

We can not use this resolution, our screens are in 1440x900.

[Problem with 3d06 8400M GS scores]

Hello

 

All the results of the 8400M GS in 3dmark 06 are unvalided. What is the problem ? bug ?

 

http://www.hwbot.org/searchResults.do?direction=&applicationId=12&teamId=0&userName=&gpu=GeForce+8400M+GS+%2859%29&numberOfVideocards=0&cpu=&chipset=&model=&manufacturer=&minScore=&maxScore=&gpuId=1201&cpuId=0&chipsetId=0&modelId=0&manufacturerId=0&offset=0&displayAdvanced=false&countryId=0&dateFrom=&dateUntil=&minGpuCoreFreq=&maxGpuCoreFreq=&minGpuMemFreq=&maxGpuMemFreq=&minCpuFreq=&maxCpuFreq=&system=&minTotalPoints=