Jump to content
HWBOT Community Forums

Gluvocio

Members
 View Profile  See their activity

  • Posts

    826

  • Joined

  • Last visited

 Content Type 

Posts posted by Gluvocio

    Clarification in PCMark'05 about Tweaks // Tricks allowed

    in Benchmark software

    Posted

    well guys... the issue, I think, is not to decide if it's legal or not a thing have been used for years.

    and for my tests without rst I noticed Gen. usage is the subtest more affected by this utility.

    Virus scan is high (about gbps ) even if there is not Write-back enabled or bios is made "bios mode" ( press Ctrl+I )

    The way how the test works seem to allow this since when it born. I saw similar sequential read on crystalDiskMark or other software... maybe a little under 1000mb/s , but anyway they were high.

    Guys, I've seen 150+ mb/s made by a single mechanical disk.

    That subtest hits high score since the dawn of time.

    With raid you began to see 1000+ scores and noticed this.

    But I think it's the way this subtest works.

    The real issue, dear mates, should be (onboard RAM) write-caching of this utility , that affect much Gen.usage subtest.

    It's a kind of software-ram-caching.

    Equaliti should be allow or disallow ram-caching on write.

    I think if disallow, decision should be applied to new scores/new CPUs ...one guy that played 1 year+ ago with e6600 / 2500k / i7 920 , never thinked it could be disallowed.

    I prefer it whould be allowed, to put under conditions to play nicely people w/out controller too...

    But for the same reason there should be allowed write-caching softwares with single disk, for equality.

    Outcome it's not my personal trouble'cause I've controller, but I'd like to contribute with my ideas on this bench I've played for years.

×
×
  • Create New...