[muzwa kai - Ryzen 7 7700X @ 5814MHz - 53sec 198ms GPUPI for CPU - 1B]

Boosted, lol!

[how do we assign team moderators?]

another easy question for someone. as the title says, how do we assign team moderators?

[team member suspected of cheating, but no proof. what do we do?]

excellent. thanks christian

[team member suspected of cheating, but no proof. what do we do?]

Any team moderator can ban someone from their team. Just go to the profile and click on 'ban from team'.

 

oh cool. how do we assign team moderators? that sounds like exactly what we need. is it only the captain that can do that?

 

also, i would like to know where to report scores.

 

thanks for helping. hopefully we can get s#!t a bit more organised.

 

muz

[team member suspected of cheating, but no proof. what do we do?]

thanks for responding guys

 

(couldnt multiquote)

 

knopflerbruce, i will pm you shortly with suspect score links.

 

we have actually confronted the member already, but he didnt respond. he has not given any reasons explaining his scores.

 

we were wondering how to kick someone from the team. is that up to the hwbot crew to decide their fate?

[team member suspected of cheating, but no proof. what do we do?]

edit: sorry if it double posted. i couldnt see message, so pasted

 

so a few of us have taken on admin responsibilities for our team recently. we are trying our best to organise/monitor the members. one member in particular has had 2 suspect results. the first score had points deleted by hwbot. now there is another score by the same member, with the same hardware, and the same inconsistencies. we are stumped on what to do, as we have no proof, other than the submitted score itself.

so what do we do?

[team member suspected of cheating, but no proof. what do we do?]

so a few of us have taken on admin responsibilities for our team recently. we are trying our best to organise/monitor the members. one member in particular has had 2 suspect results. the first score had points deleted by hwbot. now there is another score by the same member, with the same hardware, and the same inconsistencies. we are stumped on what to do, as we have no proof, other than the submitted score itself.

so what do we do?

[can't view 'overclockers australia (ocau)' member rankings]

rankings back up again

[can't view 'overclockers australia (ocau)' member rankings]

hey im just wondering if anyone knows why we can't view our member rankings, only contributions.

our team is 'overclockers australia (ocau)'

 

http://hwbot.org/rankings/overclocker/team/overclockers_australia_ocau

[pro - 2x Xeon X5680 @ 5243.2MHz - 1sec 639ms wPrime 32m]

awesome job man! go oz!

[HWBOT Rev.4 - The Plan.]

sorry if i double posted, its not showing up for me...???

 

thats why there would need to be a no 2nd hand hardware sale rule. the responsibility for administering this issue may be out of the hwbot crew's hands. it may fall upon the manufacturers and the top overclockers connected with these manufacturers to come up with the solution. there would be more retail hardware sales and may allow the financing of the individual harware id's to be implemented. together with software for registering the hardware for it's user.

[HWBOT Rev.4 - The Plan.]

Even at that though what if you sell your hardware to someone else? Then they will be submitting results with your sold hardware with that ID. Then what do you have to do, jump thru hoops to prove you sold it to them?

 

thats why there would need to be a no 2nd hand hardware sale rule. the responsibility for administering this issue may be out of the hwbot crew's hands. it may fall upon the manufacturers and the top overclockers connected with these manufacturers to come up with the solution. there would be more retail hardware sales and may allow the financing of the individual harware id's to be implemented. together with software for registering the hardware for it's user.

[HWBOT Rev.4 - The Plan.]

until there is an individual hardware id for cpu/gpu, i dont think there is a solution apart from maybe a disclaimer and hope that everyone is honest. even then there would need to be a no 2nd hand hardware sale rule.

[HWBOT Rev.4 - The Plan.]

maybe the real long term solution is for manufacturers to implement individual id's for cpu's, gpu's etc for every piece of hardware for validation like the cpu-z validation. it would require the smallest amount of data, though i have no idea how it would be implemented for each processor. something like cd keys for online games. maybe when manufacturers are more geared towards overclocking competition it may be possible to allow the smallest amount of individual data per microprocessor. it may seem like an impossible task, but it really would be such a miniscule part of a microprocessor

[HWBOT Rev.4 - The Plan.]

my god! this took too long to read about the rev 4 changes. maybe a new thread should be started with 1 post per user, with three comments for pros and three comments for cons for each user to be considered by the hwbot guys. bitching and whining gets everybody nowhere except a really long read. that was including skipping pages and pages of comments made by the same user over and over. i didnt even get an idea of how it will effect me. rev 3 lowered my rank to 40 something in australia. so i did another load of benches to get me to 22nd, now back to 24th atm. im a budget oc'er, so i think having different class leagues is a great idea. though i think it would be cool to have different leagues for every type of cooling. so the air/water/phase/cascade/ln2 guys can all compete fairly. pro's on water vs amature's on water would be great to see!

 

edit: also people cheating is a huge problem. any improvements to anti-cheating is a must do for the admininstration to consider. i think the primary concern for hwbot!