alancsalt
-
Posts
23 -
Joined
-
Last visited
Content Type
Profiles
Forums
Events
Blogs
Posts posted by alancsalt
-
-
Sheer weight of costly hardware....lol
-
Listed in http://hwbot.org/benchmark/3dmark_-_fire_strike/halloffame as Standard Stock Cooling...
-
If this is " Standard Stock Cooling" shouldn't there be a pic of the rig included? ;-)
-
Ours are on overclocked systems. I keep a overclock list thread. Currently allowing "not available", but not "not accurate" with Win7.
Systems may not be fully stable, but stability is not a requirement, just a result. As long as it's stable enough to complete the bench. Quite common with Win7 to get "not available" and that's with the latest sysinfo..
-
At OCN we are seeing results in Win7 showing "Time measurement data not available".
We also see "Time measurement inaccurate" which Futuremark specifically states on its explanation page is not acceptable to them. http://www.3dmark.com/support/troubleshooting-my-results/#validation.anomaly.TIME_MEASUREMENTS_NOT_AVAILABLE
They do not have a heading for, or explain "Time measurement data not available", but do exclude results with that error.
What is the HWbot position on this particular error?
-
You have a beta benchmark "Profeus" listed, but it is a user submission and should not be there.
I could not find a "report" facility, so this seemed as appropriate as I could find to bring it to staff attention.
-
wont let me edit, but it's 930, 1860, 1025 on the GFX
-
Kinda solves a mystery. Some drivers let me set more than 999, some didn't, (I'm only on water though, so YMMV) but newer drivers have still given better tri and quad 580 scores, so I don't feel totally forsaken.
-
Ridiculous. Refused to accept Vertex 4
-
Appreciated, wish cpu would clock a bit better with it...always want more..
-
In the screenshot GPUZ shows PhysX on, but FutureMark's results page shows PPU disabled, which it was. What is the HWBot position on this?
-
Google translate says Portugese:
I need to recover my user password http://www.hwbot.org/user/pedrocohen/ PC400 created another account, the more I want my old link did not think the password reset, help me!
-
In my "hardware library" there are a couple of cpu I don't have. Rest of the hardware is right.
No-one else has said anything, so guess I'm an orphan, but the colours and layout... guess I'll get used to it.
Still discovering how it all fits together.
I see signatures haven't caught up (-;
-
-
Honoured. Couldn't have done it without the good advice I've had from ppls, including yr goodself NoGuru. Thank you.
-
Yar, beat that Sandy, go on...ya know ya want to..
-
Nice to see that Sin0882! I'll be getting one as soon as possible!
-
Ok Found delete submission. Corrected it myself. Apologies for error.
-
Please delete - should be 2x palit gtx-460
-
2990 kroner in Norway...
They were saying 29th of April, now saying 13th of May....
-
The only thing wrong with the X58A-OC is that it is not yet for sale to mere mortals, but I can understand some might think that the current exclusivity is a good thing......
Waiting, just waiting. Sigh.
[IMPORTANT] New CPU-Z 1.73!!
in Benchmark software
Posted · Edited by alancsalt
When you use Extreme OC setting the CPU-Z validation says "unchecked" top right. Are these still acceptable for HWbot submissions?
I've had one submitted to an OC thread on Overclock.net, asking if it is acceptable.
I see "Your system won't be fully validated before it is manually checked. Requires to restart CPU-Z." Please explain "manually checked" - how and by whom?