Jump to content
HWBOT Community Forums

Khalam

Members
  • Posts

    94
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Posts posted by Khalam

  1. im speechless.... i got fed up and decided to pack the board up, but before i did so i though a why not and I fliped the dual bios switch, updated to 1.4b2 bios and.....

     

    http://valid.canardpc.com/show_oc.php?id=2167502

    2167502.png

     

    vantage stable, same volts as on rampage.... 15 minutes before it wouldnt even budge 4.8 unless i put 1.525v+ through it

  2. im gone give it another go tonight but im more then frustrated:( ive tried to copy all the settings ive used on the r4e (at least the ones gd65 will let you set). Im doing this at 6c ambient and with 2x 184cfm fans blowing across the board (ive tried with normal ambient as well). Im still waiting for my ss to get finished up so probably at least another week before i can try sub zero on it:(

  3. great job Sin;) now if you can only tell my why do you think my 3930k is full stable at 1.425v at 4.8ghz on rampage 4 extreme and is semi stable at same speed but at 1.525v on msi gd65 8d? same cooling, same temps etc, same memory and all other settings are the same.... i can bench 5250mhz on my r4e at 1.575v but couldnt even get 5ghz stable at 1.645v today on the msi board...

  4. massman im a bit at a loss here, do I rerun my last submission just to get the extra physix points so i can compete with the others (will i look like a dush then??) or wait a few days and your gone bring in a rule that only latest 3d11 version is allowed on subs that are being made after that versions launch? for example every one who made 1.01 subs when that was the current version obviously are lucky bastards that get to have a high pt score, but people who submited 1.01 scores after 1.02 or 1.03 was out should rerun theres to make it fair with the rest?

  5. well at least we know what it is.... question now is, what to do with it? I just did a trial run on all three at 4.5ghz and mems at 2400mhz:

     

    http://3dmark.com/3dm11/2394074 1.01 15699

     

    http://3dmark.com/3dm11/2394016 1.02 15155

     

    http://3dmark.com/3dm11/2393999 1.03 14881

     

    and then at 5250

     

    http://3dmark.com/3dm11/2376998 1.03 17388

     

    http://3dmark.com/3dm11/2394206 1.01 17794

     

    because I think either every one should be alowed to use either version or the submissions on versios 1.01 shouldnt count since it has such a big pt test impact.

×
×
  • Create New...