@Massman
If you look closely all data, all records, you can find this:
http://www.hwbot.org/hardware/motherboard/p8p67_pro
http://www.hwbot.org/hardware/motherboard/ga_p67a_ud7
http://www.hwbot.org/hardware/motherboard/p67a_gd65
ASUS have more records (more than 20% comparing to GIGABYTE), and UD7 is competing with P8P67 PRO for first place!?
This is no showing anything?
If you say NO, in that case this post has even less sense- http://www.hwbot.org/forum/showpost.php?p=91725&postcount=3'>http://www.hwbot.org/forum/showpost.php?p=91725&postcount=3
Just to be 100% precise, I am not challenging you, you know that I respect you. My point is that this post (http://www.hwbot.org/forum/showpost.php?p=91725&postcount=3) do not showing anything and for the overclockers this is not important at all. But from MSI point of view this is OK for marketing, because they using this to make noise like "we have best P67 MB in the whole world for overclokers" - http://forum.benchmark.rs/showthread.php?244834-MSI-Sandy-Bridge&p=2444585&viewfull=1#post2444585
All of you know that this is not true.
So my question is: HW BOT is agreeing with this MSI statement?
One more time: “MSI have best P67 MB in the whole world for overclockers”