Flav0r
-
Posts
75 -
Joined
-
Last visited
Content Type
Profiles
Forums
Events
Blogs
Posts posted by Flav0r
-
-
-
wohoooo geting close to 6000,
another a-bomb dropped
-
ill include your DC in my gn8 prayer
-
-
there is no difference, report them, and theyll get blocked as well
-
whao nice result, cpu is hot
-
splaves sandbags were to heavy
-
the current gpu generation maxxxed out?
1600mhz 290xt by x-pac
2050mhz 780ti by king of kingpin
fantastable guys
-
-
balls of steel bench
nice
-
nice to see you benching again
same goes to stuwi
great result
-
does 32m benefit from 4cores?
nice score btw congraz
-
i äm from saus germani. is it in bw or bayern?
-
"Benchmark tessellation load modified by AMD Catalyst driver, result invalid."
is this still valid? just askin...
none the less great benching. congratz for no.1
-
nice! well done! is there even some left in the cpu?
interesting catch up in the last loops compared to infras run.
-
hipro is still waiting for 22k...
-
i just love this ram
-
stop Giving Out Awards Which Promote The Products And Make Them Sound Super Special, When In Fact If You Look At All Reviews Done At Hh Everyone Gets A Reward/award Just For Participating. Also Stop Assigning Arbitrary Numbers, In The Range Of "8-10 Out Of 10" For Every Product You Review. If Everything Gets A Score Of 8-10, Then Your Ratings Should Range From 1 To 3 Instead Of Being Inflated. Yes, Users Like To See Numbers That Summarize The Result, But Your Rating Is A Disservice Because It Is Artificially Inflating The Perception Of Every Product. If You Insist On Providing Numbers On The Review, Do So In A Manner Such As That Done By Jonnyguru - It Isn't Perfect, But Its The Most Well Executed Approach Out There For Number Based Product Ratings In My Opinion. They At Least Have A Structure To How The Number Is Developed.
I Get The Sense From Comments I've Seen From You And Others There That You Genuinely Have The Best Intentions, But These Two Items Mentioned Above, As Well As The Especially Aggressive Advertising On Your Site, Can Yield An Impression That You Are Pandering To The Manufacturers.
Also, This Latest Article Gets Somewhat Laughable In The Part Where It Addresses What Users Can Expect In Real World Conditions. If You Want To Represent Real World Conditions, You Should Be Running A Main Stream Platform With A Main Stream Cpu. That Means Z77 And 3570/3770k, Not X79 With A 5ghz Ib-e. I Understand The Point You Offered About X79 Removing Bottlenecks, But A 5ghz Ib-e Isn't Real World For Most Your Audience, And Effectively Could Lead To Some Numbers Being Exaggerated Compared To What Users Can Actually Expect. Potential Bottlenecking Can Only Be Shown To Be Relevant With Multi Gpu Setups.
These Are Just Some Basic Suggestions, Without Any Filter, And I'm Trying Not To Pass Judgement To Be Fair To You. I Hope You Don't Take Offense. But As Long As You Continue Doing What You Are Doing, It Puts You On Especially Bad Footing To Write A Piece Like This Most Recent Article. It Looks Bad As Its Ironic Looking From The Outside, Considering How You Do Ratings And Awards.
Ib-e?
-
hello mr hardware legend \o/
-
its getting better and better, nice. and all 4 cores active, impressive chip
-
nice. do you still have the 580 matrix?
if yes - its 2001 time hehe
-
ram only at cl 4 oO. cl 3 not stable?
-
Great, Corsair did it again! Bronze for Dominator Platinum thumbs up!
cyclone - Core i7 4770K @ 6607MHz - 4min 40sec 129ms SuperPi - 32M
in Result Discussions
Posted
- Cyclone's SuperPI 32M verification screenshot was photochopped