ruggero
Members-
Posts
102 -
Joined
-
Last visited
Content Type
Profiles
Forums
Events
Blogs
Everything posted by ruggero
-
ludek111 - CUSL2-C @ 177MHz - 177 MHz Reference Clock
ruggero replied to gigioracing's topic in Result Discussions
ehm...there is the pci/hard disk,do you have a pata hard disk? No,in a tusl2-c the cpu is rock solid,cache is ok...i have the same problem of terra :-( -
ludek111 - CUSL2-C @ 177MHz - 177 MHz Reference Clock
ruggero replied to gigioracing's topic in Result Discussions
With my cusl2 there is the same problem. sl6bx,sl6by,sl6c8 no problems,with a celeron 1.3 ta1 no problems,with a sl6c7...crash,reboot,is hard open windows,impossible close superpi 1m. Why?I don't know...my mod is kills 3 pin,not bridge. @ludek111 recently i test max fsb 133:100 of my cusl2,is capable of 223 superpi 1m,but i have not a good memory so 167 3 3 3 7 9 is very hard,i had a cusl2-c capable of 190 superpi 1m stable. cusl2-c is not good for high fsb but 1)test in 66:100 your max pci/agp stable 2)133:100 is better of 133:133,may be your limit is the ram and not the mainboard. 3) Wr frequency....sborone -
GraduS - TUSL2-C @ 256.6MHz - 256.59 MHz Reference Clock
ruggero replied to TerraRaptor's topic in Result Discussions
Uhm,with a 1.4s clock a superpi@250 with very hard,but you can try 1.4s@230/235 and 1.266@245/250. When you will bench on ln2? -
GraduS - TUSL2-C @ 256.6MHz - 256.59 MHz Reference Clock
ruggero replied to TerraRaptor's topic in Result Discussions
with a 1.266s or a 1.4s? -
GraduS - TUSL2-C @ 256.6MHz - 256.59 MHz Reference Clock
ruggero replied to TerraRaptor's topic in Result Discussions
Muahaha,my idea of 220*9,5 4/3 2 2 2 5 7=1m is wrong,so 4/3 is very bad. So,with a normal sl6by you can broke the min with 230... -
GraduS - TUSL2-C @ 256.6MHz - 256.59 MHz Reference Clock
ruggero replied to TerraRaptor's topic in Result Discussions
nice...any bench at high fsb? -
Bong313 - Athlon XP 3000+ @ 3107MHz - 33sec 17ms SuperPi - 1M
ruggero replied to Crash01ita's topic in Result Discussions
Wr superpi 1M desktop cpu amd 32 bit... -
...do you remember when you said " 200*10,5 1:1 2 2 2 7 9 = 100% sub1m "?...200 is not sufficient for 1m. I think you must study better socket 370,now your scores are as your knowledge of this socket. Difference between 2 2 2 7 9 and 2 2 2 5 7 is not 1-2s,but 4-5s. We speak about right alphatimings for high frequency,but if you don't know the normal timings...
-
Gigio,is time to buy a good SL6BY PS:my best score is 1.00.7xx I have not other scores. 230*9,5 is a easy setup,with a good sl6by 230*10.5 is possible,but 172 2 2 2 5 7 is better then 230 3 3 3 7 9,more fast,more possible:there is not a sdram capable of 3 3 3 7 9 but there are more sdram capable of 172 2 2 2 5 7. Perhaps russian overclockers don't trust the italian overclockers:when I said "when I said 200 is not sufficient for 1 minute" I have not been believed...this is not good ;-)
-
There is yet a score sub 1 min,in fact my time is not wr. The sl6by have a IHS,is not necessary another...the problems was for other motivations 1)cpu pot lost nitrogen 2)ram pot had was too fast,-100°,-40°,-80° and my sdram have coldbug,-55° in my cusl2,-65° in my tusl2-c (???) In these conditions was hard bench,so,a run a 195,a run a 200 and a run a 205...208 freeze(cusl2);after one hour I tried with my tusl2-c,but freeze around 202 with -65°,A year has passed, I do not remember well :-( I promised myself another bench when someone beat my time,but in italy the times are hard and I sold almost everything :-( I have played a little with terra,I don't say immediately my best time,I hope he is not angry with me overclock is only a hobby
-
I.nfraR.ed - Athlon XP-M 2500+ @ 3581MHz - 29sec 703ms SuperPi - 1M
ruggero replied to ruggero's topic in Result Discussions
Ok,thank's and again congratulation for the score. -
Wow,it's the first time which I see the Evga Epower and the asus rog oc panel...Now I understand what's the emod power My best score is 1.00.7xx at 205,but I had more problems with ln2 pot,i think with my sdram is possible 208 2 2 2 7 9 with a thermal regolation around -50°;also a better s.o. can give my a hand with the time,but my run is only for fun,for this is not in hwbot. In my idea,and is not the first time which i write this,1:1 is not the right way to take the wr 1m 370,way of 4/3 fsb/ram is better,find a lucky sl6by or a normal 1.266 and try 230/172 2 2 2 5 7.
-
Gigioracing - SDR SDRAM @ 227MHz - 227.34 MHz Memory Clock
ruggero replied to gigioracing's topic in Result Discussions
wow,impressive,very good ram,time to 240 mhz