Lupino.86
-
Posts
51 -
Joined
-
Last visited
Content Type
Profiles
Forums
Events
Blogs
Posts posted by Lupino.86
-
-
Really, CPU have booted and I have can made screenshot, AMAZING LOL
edit: der8auer, no problem with my account? sure? if you tell me, I delete this incredible and funny result... I do not want trouble
-
I can not believe it my eyes!
I understand your concerns but CPUZ has validated my submit file (is impossible cheat), I can not say that he has misread the frequency!
-
Yes, I use Italian XP
THANKS for reply
-
tuned for update
THANKS GENiEBEN!!!
-
Well, the result show and I can save it :-) but why this DLL error?
-
This is the log:
[2014-06-17T01:50:39] background set
[2014-06-17T01:50:39] ideal thread count: 1
[2014-06-17T01:50:39] settings read and applied
[2014-06-17T01:50:39] systeminfo is enabled
[2014-06-17T01:50:44] dxdiag launched: 1
I try "Disable System Info.reg" and the GUI start, now run bench
-
Please help me!
I use fresh installation of WinXP SP3 with all Framework version but HWBOT Aquarmark don't start and show this error (please see the attachment):
AppName: hwbotaqua3.exe AppVer: 0.0.0.0 ModName: qt5core.dll
ModVer: 5.2.0.0 Offset: 00065ddd
I wait your reply,
THANKS!!!
-
Thanks for explanation and excuse me.
-
THANKS of the warning, I did not think it was different.
Can you exlain me the difference? I will not make mistakes in the future ;-)
-
Eeky NoX and ALL other (bad) guys, I am not touchy but absolutely do not accept insults. P.S. I'm not a rookie or noob or cheater or tweaker
-
I.nfraR.ed, I did not understand what I have to shoot with video and please explain you RAMdisk config.
ObscureParadox, HighPriority gain not 100% increase but good 20-30% yes
-
see my last result in my profile: score is same or better than Xeon 5680... What do you mean now? I also cheat/bug these results??? ALL RESULT FAKE?
-
Guys, if you do not know how to optimize the BIOS and the operating system is not my fault...
-
Friend, enough to have the operating system in poor condition and also having the 1000CPU result will never be good
-
Excuse me, I do not understand why you do not want to admit the result... you all know the power of the EVGA SR-2? all know the power of the 12x CPU at 3.760Ghz? Having or not having Xeon 5680/5690 it does not mean doing good result, you can do with smaller cpu and other LEGAL mode :-) for example Real Time Priority in TaskManager is a big help
-
Maedhros, I use RamDisk
Run program directly from RamDisk is huge performance boost (over 5GB/s band, 0.5GB/s SSD and 0.2GB HDD RAID0) and is not a tweak
-
I have used hwbot prime file for submit.....I thought it was all ok
-
Trust me, friend, I repeated the test three times even restarting Win7!
This CPU over 3/3.2Ghz is really beast
edit: I use low timings and 24GB in Triple Channel, don't forget!
-
Xeon E5630 or E5649? no same category ;-)
-
Yes, SORRY, huge mistake :-(
-
I use 1:2 BIOS value and I have double frequency in memory work
edit: Yes, SORRY, huge mistake :-(
-
My cpu work rock solid 66x5 but is a Mobile edition
-
now is all right, sorry for my mistake
-
Thanks for fast reply!
Will you correct the error?
Lupino.86 - Pentium 2 333Mhz @ 3018.1MHz - 3018.08 mhz CPU Frequency
in Result Discussions
Posted
of what? CPUZ validation is truth