Jump to content
HWBOT Community Forums

sacha35

Members
  • Posts

    65
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Everything posted by sacha35

  1. All the below users cards are 512Mb versions that are in the 1GB 2900 XT group, or have no verification, could someone please move these to the correct group. Results matching hardware: Radeon HD 2900 XT 1024 MB 3Dmark 2001 glenboy (Guru3D) http://www.hwbot.org/compare.do?resultId=717286 http://www.hwbot.org/compare.do?resultId=699580 http://www.hwbot.org/compare.do?resultId=695917 http://www.hwbot.org/compare.do?resultId=693774 http://www.hwbot.org/compare.do?resultId=668010 http://www.hwbot.org/compare.do?resultId=667559 http://www.hwbot.org/compare.do?resultId=665515 http://www.hwbot.org/compare.do?resultId=655328 http://www.hwbot.org/compare.do?resultId=655323 http://www.hwbot.org/compare.do?resultId=652766 http://www.hwbot.org/compare.do?resultId=685987 AuToXeC_w1zArD (AquaPC) http://www.hwbot.org/compare.do?resultId=713779 http://www.hwbot.org/compare.do?resultId=711626 RagDoll_Effect (Guru3D) http://www.hwbot.org/compare.do?resultId=670604 3Dmark 2003. hadji_a (OutOfSpecs.Gr) http://www.hwbot.org/compare.do?resultId=690982 http://www.hwbot.org/compare.do?resultId=670058 http://www.hwbot.org/compare.do?resultId=669604 glenboy (Guru3D) http://www.hwbot.org/compare.do?resultId=699275 http://www.hwbot.org/compare.do?resultId=693332 http://www.hwbot.org/compare.do?resultId=668035 http://www.hwbot.org/compare.do?resultId=667604 http://www.hwbot.org/compare.do?resultId=653888 http://www.hwbot.org/compare.do?resultId=653050 cadaveca (XtremeSystems) http://www.hwbot.org/compare.do?resultId=702676http://www.hwbot.org/compare.do?resultId=696555 http://www.hwbot.org/compare.do?resultId=693596 http://www.hwbot.org/compare.do?resultId=680867 dami1stm (JMax-Hardware) http://www.hwbot.org/compare.do?resultId=680781 AuToXeC_w1zArD (AquaPC) http://www.hwbot.org/compare.do?resultId=673124 http://www.hwbot.org/compare.do?resultId=680971 3Dmark 2005. glenboy (Guru3D) http://www.hwbot.org/compare.do?resultId=717284 http://www.hwbot.org/compare.do?resultId=699274 http://www.hwbot.org/compare.do?resultId=693373 http://www.hwbot.org/compare.do?resultId=693329 http://www.hwbot.org/compare.do?resultId=692699 http://www.hwbot.org/compare.do?resultId=692367 http://www.hwbot.org/compare.do?resultId=657111 http://www.hwbot.org/compare.do?resultId=653095 http://www.hwbot.org/compare.do?resultId=685592 http://www.hwbot.org/compare.do?resultId=677514'>http://www.hwbot.org/compare.do?resultId=677514 hadji_a (OutOfSpecs.Gr) http://www.hwbot.org/compare.do?resultId=690978 cadaveca (XtremeSystems) http://www.hwbot.org/compare.do?resultId=702671 http://www.hwbot.org/compare.do?resultId=696553 http://www.hwbot.org/compare.do?resultId=693598 http://www.hwbot.org/compare.do?resultId=680851 AuToXeC_w1zArD (AquaPC) http://www.hwbot.org/compare.do?resultId=673115 http://www.hwbot.org/compare.do?resultId=680977 http://www.hwbot.org/compare.do?resultId=677514 I will carry on with the rest tomorrow Sorry guys you won’t lose these results but just be put in the right group, I have been asked by a member of the HWbot crew to go though some of the results.
  2. As there has been a big change around with the groups of which GFX cards have been put into can I ask all mods to have a look carefully at these groups as I have been looking though one of my old 2900XT 1GB groups and have found that there are loads of 2900512Mb cards put in this group. I have spent around an hour or two looking though all and have reported some but as said there has been a big change that has gone on within HWbot with regards Grouping so could all groups be looked into as I am sure there are 100-1000 that are in the wrong groups now and some without screen res or proof of card description. Many Thanks
  3. Hi there and thank you for the reply, this system bench was submitted directly online using the upload link directly to Wprime, if the software is the correct version as you guys require then this should have been able to check my results and upload the correct score naming the correct CPU. I think this should be looked into as this would be very easy for other members and teams to run a slower clock speed with a quad core CPU and upload them as it sees a duel core. Also I see you have fixed my Wprime 32m time by putting this in the right section of CPU of which I have asked to be done but why have you now removed my Wprime 1024 system bench instead of putting this in the right CPU section, I am not cheating or hiding anything as I am the one who has reported this bug with Wprime version 1.55, therefore could you please correct the CPU for this Wprime system bench and please reinstate this back for me as I have done everything to the book as HWbot require using version 1.55 of Wprime and have uploaded my results directly using the upload link to Wprime. Many Thanks
  4. Ok Guys after having my results pulled in Wprime for incorrect version today I benched with Wprime version 1.55 as you require for this to be valid. I ran my QX9650 and submitted the results directly to Wprime whom then upload to yourself, on looking at my results you can see that this version of Wprime has bugs in it as it is seeing my QX9650 CPU as an E6850, there would be no way in the world I could have hit these scores with a duel core CPU. I think this should be looked into as said I have done everything by the Hwbot book and with version 1.55 and this is wrong, my times and results are right by the QX9650 CPU, but this version of Wprime is incorrect as it is not seeing the right CPU or speed. http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=717122
  5. Hi there just received a mail to say this bench has been marked as 'incorrect submission: This entry http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=693914 Has been deleted by crew member, NeoForce, so it is impossible for me or anyone else to check to make sure this is correct as I am only taking the word of NeoForce. In future can we please have access to these reported incorrect scores so that we and others can check them before they are removed? It is not a problem as I will just rebench this as this score was easy to get, the problem though is having score removed so we have no access to seeing them and checking to see if they are wrong or not.
  6. could we not just give you guys a list of these members that need removing and then you could remove them from our benching team? I think this would be the easy way to go, even though it will put a bit of extra work on you guys.
  7. Bump: Any news yet as to when we will be able to remove/request members be removed from our team in the HWbot records that are not active at all and have never submited any results, please
  8. Hi jmke, as you can see this has been sorted already and i Quote from what SF3D has said, (Skulltrail doesn't change anything) so i take it from what he has said this will stand as a one motherboard catagree as all the rest of the freely avalible motherboards, so as these words have come from one of your Moderators I take it this will stand as one Motherboard catagree and be lumped in with the rest of the CPU's.
  9. This is what i am saying, all the multithreated tasks benchmarks will go to the Skulltrail, so as long as we are happy with a dule GPU being a single card then we should be happy with an 2 x 4 cores on one motherboard.
  10. Ok Guys if this is how you feel just wait until the new Intel Skultrail hits the market, i hope we can keep this as a single motherboard then as it will wipe the floor with any single CPU'd motherboard.
  11. I agree with you Massman, but it should still be easy to do, what i am worried about is that we will see a decline in benchers because of the amount that they will have to part with just to be able to bench or even try and be competitive in this field, if this is not done i can see a fast decline in benchers around the world as the simply wont be able to afford the expense this will impose on them. Yes as said it will mean a load of work from you guys with Code ECT, but i think you could have something great at the end of the day in each section by doing this, as everyone can then see what is the best in each of any given field with different hardwear used. My early point about Motor sport said it all, everyone can have just as much fun and enjoyment from different categories this way as they will be competing on an even playing filed and at there affordable expense. Yes single card but with two GPU's on it, what you are saying is not right, this is like saying a single engine car of 2000cc competing with a twin engine 4000cc car, only one car but one has two engines and the same goes for this new 3870x2 card as it has two engines on one PCB so this should not be put in the same categories as a single cad with one GPU as it only has one engine to process the information it receives.
  12. Know contardition at all, all i am asking is make two sets, one for Price/GPU and CPU then how many cors an item has, it will mean a lot of work on you guys but this way it will make it fair for all, as this way it should suite all out there.
  13. HI there all and i apologize for this long post to start with, but feel i need to put my point forward for the good and fun of this benching communities. will this be the same then when the new Intel skull trail Motherboard comes out benching against single slot CPU motherboards as this will still be only one motherboard but have two X4 CPU's on it? I think this will be totally unfair for the general bencher that has limited funds as all these CPU's/GPU's should be put in there own bracket and receive the points for that bracket within Hwbot scoring system. If this will be the case then it will be only about who has the biggest wallet of which is the case but this will make it even more so if this ruling is going to stand and will be a shame because i can see a lot of benchers out there just giving up as there will be know point in them benching due to this and the pricing of these new items. This is meant to be a fun thing that we all take part in and enjoy doing, but when it starts coming down to who has the most money then it will just be like an F1 team who has the most money will always win of which we have all seen the boring days of Ferrari and most did not bother watching TV because they new who would win the race. Coming from a Motor racing background yes it has always been about money who has the most wins,but there was different categories for different types of vehicle, the way you guys are putting this it is like saying lets race a 250cc Gokart against an F1, both has the maximum spent on them one has a two stroke twin cylinder engine and the other has a v10 engine in it,why would anyone compete because we all know that the F1 would win even if the Kart racer was a world champion and the F1 driver was a novice. But it is not done this way as you might know there are many different categories within motor sport and each is awarded the maximum points in there own categories. I personally think it would be a very good idea to have different categories/Price range of hardware and then award the given points for this categories, as someone on a very limited budget who can only afford the cheapest of parts can still be competitive in his own categories and be awarded the top points for this given categories, if this is not done as said i can see a lot of benchers just giving up the game as when the new Intel skull trail hits the market we all know this will be the winner and them who have the money to spend will wipe the floor with more experienced guys out there who just can not afford to purchase this new bit of kit. So in a nut shell please make different categories for different hardware, Single card is a single card with one GPU on it, single card with two GPU's is two GPU benching ECT. I hope i have made my points clear enough for all and for the goodness of this community and the fun involved please look into making these changes soon. Many Thanks for taking the time to read this and taking on board what i have said. Regards Sacha
×
×
  • Create New...