Just Learnin'

It would have been worth over 10 boints if he did not have higher scores and you did not copy and paste the full description from the moderation thread: "no boints: nothing, but doubtful or reported results from this category should still be blocked"

Is this score in 3DMark2001SE valid, http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=612557 ? The screenshot doesn't seem to show the resolution. http://aycu13.webshots.com/image/17772/2001113185884760605_rs.jpg I tried to use the report button but this happened: Crap. An error happened.We could blame this on you but it's most likely our crappy coding skills. You could try again or nudge our developpers for fixing this. Error messagejava.lang.NullPointerException: null Error stack traceorg.hwbot.web.actions.ReportResultAction.run line 45 org.hwbot.web.actions.HwbotAction.execute line 29 org.apache.struts.action.RequestProcessor.processActionPerform line 419 org.apache.struts.action.RequestProcessor.process line 224 org.apache.struts.action.ActionServlet.process line 1194 org.apache.struts.action.ActionServlet.doPost line 432 javax.servlet.http.HttpServlet.service line 709 javax.servlet.http.HttpServlet.service line 802 org.apache.catalina.core.ApplicationFilterChain.internalDoFilter line 237 org.apache.catalina.core.ApplicationFilterChain.doFilter line 157

MUCH appreciated! I need all the help I can get, this is the first non-AGP card I ever owned as well as my first nVidia card...

Just got one of these: PV-T80U-SHD9 GeForce 8800 Ultra 768MB DDR3 RoHS Dual DVI XXX http://xfxforce.com:80/web/product/listConfigurationDetails.jspa?productConfigurationId=1118128 and wondered what software would be best to use to overclock it?

I like tHis one,

Hope your not all alone in this section!

Does it say Northwood in CPU-Z? There are also Prescott's with Hyperthreading which would be a Pentium 4 'E'.

Try typing Pentium in the processor slot, works for me.

Invalid verification link: http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=559287 http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=596617 http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=596616 http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=571390 Screenshot link no good: http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=595232 http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=595231 No CPU-Z in SuperPI screenie: http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=594997 http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=556027 Also are these acceptable screenshots for 3DMark?: http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=577098 http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=580937 http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=577498 http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=575561 http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=581155 http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=574925 http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=580758 http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=581162 http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=574972 http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=575622 http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=574976 How about these screenshots for Pifast, acceptable?: http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=595273 http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=595179

My apologies! I think that the previous score may have been right now (my bad) sorry! I was searching intels Processor Specs and it seems there were P4B's with those specs? You are sure there aren't P4B processors with that stepping and revision? If so here are more he submitted in the P4 B categories: http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=569343 http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=569340 http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=569338 http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=569345 http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=569396 http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=569395

I believe this is a P4C in the P4B section: http://www.hwbot.org/compareProcessorResult.do?resultId=608479#result CPU-Z in screenshot shows stepping 9 Revision D1

Different multiplier.

This one isn't: http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=559219 it is a Pentium 4 'M', in the Pentium 4 'B' category.

Curious if this Mobile CPU with different multi belongs with the regular P4 533FSB 3.06 GHz Northwoods? http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=559219

No screenshot: http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=506060

Prescott CPU in the Northwood SuperPI category also showing at 3200MHz when the screenie shows near 4000MHz. http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=506987 This one has no screenie and says he has an EE ES: http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=506734 Nothing in his screenie indicates what CPU he has: http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=576179 Link to screenie in forum post no good http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=593954 Screenshot no good: http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=520037

Hi, Wondered why this result was blocked? http://hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=551140 Also what is the best way to post a screenie for an Aquamark score? Do you want CPU-Z and or ATiTool or other card overclocking software screenies included with the Aquamark score?

Screenies are good enough in wPrime too?

Here to back up my case regarding invalid checksums in wPrime are cases where a screenie would show no problem but the results he posted failed checksum validation: http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=576572 http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=576881 So do these scores stand? From my previous post: Also wPrime has seperate categories for ES and regular 3.06 chips. Why is the ES chip submitted with the regular 'B' chips?

Thanks for the clarification! Xeon's are included then? So screenies in wPrime are ok without validation? Because I have some awesome ones that failed checksum validation!

Hello! Result posted in Pentium 'B' category, validation link shows CPU to be an 'ES' http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=577268 Is just a screenshot ok to submit for wPrime? I have had scores that were excellent but failed checksum.I question whether this would pass the checksum validation: http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=595484 How is this determined to be a Pentium 4 'B' ? http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=563524 Thanks for your concern. JL