MrCape

Just wondering how these are approved. One submission in the top 5 9800GX2 that seems legit is by Mayk. His QX9650 @ 4950mhz socres 20062 cpu points - That seems legit. On the other hand, some others in the top five are lesser chips, clocked way lower and are scoring as much as 40000 cpu points. Maybe I'm wrong, but I can't see how these are not using physx: http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=777557 - Q6600 @ 4104mhz = 39,186 cpu points? Gold medal? http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=777295 - Q6700 @ 3099mhz = 32,598 cpu points? Not trying to be a bitch or a rat, but it's a waste of time for me to submit legit scores until this is sorted. I was guilty of this by mistake at first and mine was deleted. It's just not clear that you need to shut physx off, so I think it will continue to be a mess unless you stop allowing screen shots as proof.

Please hit us with a big red warning when this new version becomes a requirement. I put a good amount of LN into v1.55 testing a couple slow cpus.

Tx guys! Just needed to know how it works.

So the scores with the old version are somewhat immortal? I'm sure it's a difficult issue, versioning.

Hi just a question about results using older wares 1. Pentium 520 Wprime 32 m score is using v1.41a. Would I be able to use 1.41a to compete with that score?

So I have an old 486dx chip that can run win95 at best. I can run superpi and chkcpu. CPUZ is a no go according to Franck@x86. What can I submit for this chip?