-
Posts
820 -
Joined
-
Last visited
Content Type
Profiles
Forums
Events
Blogs
Posts posted by demiurg
-
-
http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=712800
http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=712802
http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=712627
http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=712801 no gpu-z(2008)
wprime 1024m
http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=688586 wprime 1.58 after 1.1.08,cpu-z only-why is valid???
http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=717947 not enought proof
http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=695906 1.58 2008
http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=717935 1.61 2008 why is valid?
http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=717076 1.58 2008
http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=696868 ????????????
fixed
-
-
http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=615203 - Prescott 2.8HT in Prescott 2.8A category
http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=573077 - suspect score. ORB link inaccessible. Perhaps, it's Prescott 2.8HT in Prescott 2.8A category
http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=606352 - Prescott 2.8HT in Prescott 2.8A category
http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=605417 - Prescott 2.8HT in Prescott 2.8A category
http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=605410 - Prescott 2.8HT in Prescott 2.8A category
http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=578371 - Prescott 2.8HT in Prescott 2.8A category
http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=598455 - Prescott 2.8HT in Prescott 2.8A category
http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=615210 - Prescott 2.8HT in Prescott 2.8A category
http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=559759 - Prescott 2.8HT in Prescott 2.8A category
http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=607713 - CPU-Z screen is absent
fixed
-
All the below users cards are 512Mb versions that are in the 1GB 2900 XT group, or have no verification, could someone please move these to the correct group.
Results matching hardware: Radeon HD 2900 XT 1024 MB
3Dmark 2001
glenboy (Guru3D)
http://www.hwbot.org/compare.do?resultId=717286
http://www.hwbot.org/compare.do?resultId=699580
http://www.hwbot.org/compare.do?resultId=695917
http://www.hwbot.org/compare.do?resultId=693774
http://www.hwbot.org/compare.do?resultId=668010
http://www.hwbot.org/compare.do?resultId=667559
http://www.hwbot.org/compare.do?resultId=665515
http://www.hwbot.org/compare.do?resultId=655328
http://www.hwbot.org/compare.do?resultId=655323
http://www.hwbot.org/compare.do?resultId=652766
http://www.hwbot.org/compare.do?resultId=685987
AuToXeC_w1zArD (AquaPC)
http://www.hwbot.org/compare.do?resultId=713779
http://www.hwbot.org/compare.do?resultId=711626
RagDoll_Effect (Guru3D)
http://www.hwbot.org/compare.do?resultId=670604
3Dmark 2003.
hadji_a (OutOfSpecs.Gr)
http://www.hwbot.org/compare.do?resultId=690982
http://www.hwbot.org/compare.do?resultId=670058
http://www.hwbot.org/compare.do?resultId=669604
glenboy (Guru3D)
http://www.hwbot.org/compare.do?resultId=699275
http://www.hwbot.org/compare.do?resultId=693332
http://www.hwbot.org/compare.do?resultId=668035
http://www.hwbot.org/compare.do?resultId=667604
http://www.hwbot.org/compare.do?resultId=653888
http://www.hwbot.org/compare.do?resultId=653050
cadaveca (XtremeSystems)
http://www.hwbot.org/compare.do?resultId=702676http://www.hwbot.org/compare.do?resultId=696555
http://www.hwbot.org/compare.do?resultId=693596
http://www.hwbot.org/compare.do?resultId=680867
dami1stm (JMax-Hardware)
http://www.hwbot.org/compare.do?resultId=680781
AuToXeC_w1zArD (AquaPC)
http://www.hwbot.org/compare.do?resultId=673124
http://www.hwbot.org/compare.do?resultId=680971
3Dmark 2005.
glenboy (Guru3D)
http://www.hwbot.org/compare.do?resultId=717284
http://www.hwbot.org/compare.do?resultId=699274
http://www.hwbot.org/compare.do?resultId=693373
http://www.hwbot.org/compare.do?resultId=693329
http://www.hwbot.org/compare.do?resultId=692699
http://www.hwbot.org/compare.do?resultId=692367
http://www.hwbot.org/compare.do?resultId=657111
http://www.hwbot.org/compare.do?resultId=653095
http://www.hwbot.org/compare.do?resultId=685592
http://www.hwbot.org/compare.do?resultId=677514'>http://www.hwbot.org/compare.do?resultId=677514
hadji_a (OutOfSpecs.Gr)
http://www.hwbot.org/compare.do?resultId=690978
cadaveca (XtremeSystems)
http://www.hwbot.org/compare.do?resultId=702671
http://www.hwbot.org/compare.do?resultId=696553
http://www.hwbot.org/compare.do?resultId=693598
http://www.hwbot.org/compare.do?resultId=680851
AuToXeC_w1zArD (AquaPC)
http://www.hwbot.org/compare.do?resultId=673115
http://www.hwbot.org/compare.do?resultId=680977
http://www.hwbot.org/compare.do?resultId=677514
I will carry on with the rest tomorrow
Sorry guys you won’t lose these results but just be put in the right group, I have been asked by a member of the HWbot crew to go though some of the results.
Fixed
Please provide only direct link to result, not compare one!
-
Pentium4 2.8 HT Prescott in Pentium 4 2.8A Prescott category
http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=598635
http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=605407
http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=615203
http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=559763
http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=609700
http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=625850
http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=562386
http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=606352
http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=605417
http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=605410
http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=615209
http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=599287
http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=607710
http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=717857
http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=563540
http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=605485
http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=578371
http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=560239
http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=605411
http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=598455
http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=615210
http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=581208
http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=559759
http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=559366
http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=625849
http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=717860
http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=560554
http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=581204
http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=605271
http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=560022
http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=563541
http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=600981
http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=607719
http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=605409
http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=605533
http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=601567
_______________________________________________________________
http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=615211 - CPU-Z screen is absent
http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=607713 - CPU-Z screen is absent
fixed
-
@71proste
Sorry, mate, but this thread for Russians Overs team`s HW only
It is proof that they are not engaged in HW sharing.
-
-
explain me now demiurg......
why you ask some proffs to accept a result....when you don't want it anyway...
for example.....you ask for a super-pi or w-prime 3 things necessary and 2 more optional....
the test , cpu-z first tab and memory tab this is necessary....
and memset(and an other one that i dont remember) optional.....
THIS IS YOUR RULES......but you ignore them......
can you explain me why?
and i will don't make complains any more....
this post has not any flame....
it's friendy questions...
I was trying to be as much tolerant and friendly to all users as possible. I did not block result if it was possible to define precisely a category in which result should be.
But now I think you are right. I`ll blocked those results ASAP.
-
http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=708386
http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=709697
GPU-Z isn't necessary for new results?
http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=628359
no orb !
http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=712284
http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=664994
http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=604859
http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=575569
http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=613753
http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=613220
http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=604192
http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=713661
no memory tab of cpu-z(necessary)
http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=609129
no cpu-z at all
fixed
-
http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=717081 - no GPU-Z screen
Demuirg, please pay attention to GFX score (~14k) and my GFX score (~9k)
fixed
You know my ICQ number
-
-
-
-
Thorton in Thoroughbred category:
http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=694260
Barton in Thorton category:
fixed
-
insufficient verifications for rankings
http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=717081 - GPU-Z screen is absent
http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=717468 - GPU-Z screen is absent
http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=717481 - GPU-Z screen is absent
Please check this..
fixed
-
-
Also I see you have fixed my Wprime 32m time by putting this in the right section of CPU of which I have asked to be done but why have you now removed my Wprime 1024 system bench instead of putting this in the right CPU section, I am not cheating or hiding anything as I am the one who has reported this bug with Wprime version 1.55, therefore could you please correct the CPU for this Wprime system bench and please reinstate this back for me as I have done everything to the book as HWbot require using version 1.55 of Wprime and have uploaded my results directly using the upload link to Wprime.
Many Thanks
I didn`t do anything at all with your result in wPrime 1024.
-
Ok Guys after having my results pulled in Wprime for incorrect version today I benched with Wprime version 1.55 as you require for this to be valid.
I ran my QX9650 and submitted the results directly to Wprime whom then upload to yourself, on looking at my results you can see that this version of Wprime has bugs in it as it is seeing my QX9650 CPU as an E6850, there would be no way in the world I could have hit these scores with a duel core CPU.
I think this should be looked into as said I have done everything by the Hwbot book and with version 1.55 and this is wrong, my times and results are right by the QX9650 CPU, but this version of Wprime is incorrect as it is not seeing the right CPU or speed.
Why do not you just fix mismatched CPU manually?
-
http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=716987 please delete this result. Reason SLI, not a single video.
fixed
Why we should delete it? May be moving into right category is better way
-
-
-
http://www.hwbot.org/compare.do?resultId=716604
category- 6800XT, NV41.
Never gonna pull that score with an Opto 185 @ 3GHz and low GPU clocks!
blocked
-
http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=708451
please check this result, too higth score looking to others the same
I think it is just iRam
-
same result / validation submitted by 2 different members
partially fixed
Wrong Result
in Submission & member moderation
Posted
fixed