gradus

There are plenty of them, but they all have been already deleted because Deleted: Athlon XP 2000+ Palomino http://www.hwbot.org/signature.img?iid=48264&thumb=false http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=654190 http://hwbot.org/signature.img?iid=48266&thumb=false http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=654191 http://hwbot.org/signature.img?iid=48263&thumb=false http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=654189 http://hwbot.org/signature.img?iid=48446&thumb=false http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=654442 http://hwbot.org/signature.img?iid=48383&thumb=false http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=654358 http://hwbot.org/signature.img?iid=48259&thumb=false http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=654186 http://hwbot.org/signature.img?iid=48261&thumb=false http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=654187 Athlon XP 1900+ http://hwbot.org/signature.img?iid=48481&thumb=false http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=654499 http://hwbot.org/signature.img?iid=48482&thumb=false http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=654500 http://hwbot.org/signature.img?iid=48483&thumb=false http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=654501 http://hwbot.org/signature.img?iid=48484&thumb=false http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=654502 http://hwbot.org/signature.img?iid=48485&thumb=false http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=654503 http://hwbot.org/signature.img?iid=48486&thumb=false http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=654504 http://hwbot.org/signature.img?iid=48487&thumb=false http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=654505 Athlon XP 1800+ http://hwbot.org/signature.img?iid=47468&thumb=false http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=653233 http://hwbot.org/signature.img?iid=53674&thumb=false http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=660619 http://hwbot.org/signature.img?iid=47471&thumb=false http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=653238 http://hwbot.org/signature.img?iid=47469&thumb=false http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=653234 http://hwbot.org/signature.img?iid=53675&thumb=false http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=660620 http://hwbot.org/signature.img?iid=47474&thumb=false http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=653241 http://hwbot.org/signature.img?iid=47473&thumb=false http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=653240

White line below CPU-Z and cut right side of cpu-z?!?! no comments. Some People Are Alive Because It`s Illegal To Ban Them

about The main idea of the multimonitor configuration is about leaving the stuff like Start, icons and task bar on one monitor and getting a free space for working on the second one. So, the explanation is rather odd, because we clearly see Paint in the taskbar, but no CPU-Z. Or you want to say you can split the taskbar on two monitors as you wish? I don't think so. Want to see how this can be done, if can. Because Bwana have mobo with voltmod and modbios. Did I guess?

what? what warning? where 1st? i think massman ask me about my system. Open eyes and look at screen! White line below CPU-Z and cut right side of cpu-z! this screen from valid link! with no ID.

if file damaged you will not receive the link and cpu-z screen like yours. If you have link, you have cpu-z screen with ID. next higher cpu-z file damaged?!?! 100mhz? 7 month? http://valid.x86-secret.com/show_oc.php?id=186341 Submitted by Bwanasofz [Crazy-Oc] | Wed, 11 Apr 2007 11:45:28 +0200 | Validated by CPU-Z 1.39 & http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=677612 18 Dec 2007 12:14 created Bwanasoft manual online submission cpu-z 1.42 no.

We understand all.

Bwanasoft why you delete your result? lol

after this bwana delete result: But i save result: and this:

you are LOL! no voltage window on screen!)))))))))))

Bwanasoft how about this results: http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=677612 this result from valid.x86-secret.com(no voltage) with deleted ID! Why? On a valid.x86-secret.com or ripping.org there is no such result. Plz give validation link. http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=635442 http://home.arcor.de/manika/750.PNG mspaint ;-) White line below CPU-Z and cut right side. PS I save yours screens.

voltmod and bios will not give the processor cpuid from another core! where valid with 681&680 on palomino? rebench? you mean remspaint?!?!

c, ban? What difference, was you a moderator or not? On how many I know cpu-z 1.41 has no problems with CPUID on palomino and 0.13 or 0.18um! no difference what mobo you bench. show valid link whis palomino cpuid 681 and 0.13!!!!

Bwanasoft Your photos of processors justify nothing. WHAT?!? =-0 Yours Palomino have CPUID from Thoroughbred!!!! cpu-z 1.41 or mobo???!!!!?? Make validation with any of these processors. Example: http://www.hwbot.org/signature.img?iid=48264&thumb=false

It is normal. LOL.

skwiatek-hard-pc.pl (United Team of Poland) http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=705676 - no info, not default settings http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=709995 - photoshop http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=705669 - no info http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=710106 - pantera 366?!?! %)

http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=706176 1024x768 2006mark old 3dmark: http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=641360 http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=657015 http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=600522 http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=657017 http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=640596 http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=602405 not default settings: http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=703368 no resolution on screen: http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=703841 http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=640592

What do you mean?

^^^^^^

Why are you here? What is your aim? Only to win points? I thought everyone here to show his skills and to take pleasure from overclocking. The rules of overclocking are the same everywhere, in futuremark and hwbot. So we have found an expert in cheating....

//////

not the same....and not the better for sure So may be we should allow testing 8800 or 3870x2 on GOZ or Omega? Why are these drivers considered to be cheaters by the futuremark and you consider them normal? If you can tweak standard ones for what you need these ones? lol) Usually I am accusing only real cheaters, if not- this topic would be greater. So you should take any result which I have posted and try to prove Im not right. And what we are talking about?! You even dont know how to move your result from 6600ddr to 6600ddr3... Its only you IMHO. Though I would be surprised if 2 poles had different opinions. If you want to teach someone you should know how to do it yourself. All your screens are just like that)))): http://www.hwbot.org/signature.img?iid=84189&thumb=false http://www.hwbot.org/signature.img?iid=84078&thumb=false http://www.hwbot.org/signature.img?iid=84070&thumb=false http://www.hwbot.org/signature.img?iid=84072&thumb=false Look at normal screen, and learn: http://www.hwbot.org/signature.img?iid=65240&thumb=false

I understand this. as I say: you can learn ppl do good screens)...and bench on normal drivers

He could reach the same result with the help of any videocard, I also can test 8800 and I will have the results from 10000 to 100000...then i submit results to all categories. Will it be ok? Such a result should be delete immediately. +1 We need more moderatorS!!! not 1 moderator.... Only one Massman is doing something, I wonder where the others are?!? O polonos very strange man....I am not talking about Bwanasoft as the great part of the C.I.S. overclockers is waiting for explanation of his faked screens which we havent received yet, so to my mind this question should be considered in the forum... Its only you IMO, i don't think so. Its true. Only bans can stop this mass of cheaters. ps I post many strange results from your team in this thread...many results! Think about it, explain it to your team and learn to do screens. they are using banned tweaks cause its impossible to increase performance such good. You think he don't know about resolution or somthing like that?)))

manny - PcOverclock.net Team only 3dmarks..... 2001 not real score for this clocks (some videocards 64bit). benchmark was not run using default settings. no resolution on screen or no video info. sometimes he use omega driver and run not on default settings. http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=700529 http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=702827 http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=701138 http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=639119 http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=700899 http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=640591 http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=700880 http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=702176 2003 professional edition,no resolution on screen: http://www.hwbot.org/compare.do?resultId=702776 http://www.hwbot.org/compare.do?resultId=701141 http://www.hwbot.org/compare.do?resultId=702828 http://www.hwbot.org/compare.do?resultId=700900 http://www.hwbot.org/compare.do?resultId=689844 http://www.hwbot.org/compare.do?resultId=697095 http://www.hwbot.org/compare.do?resultId=700531 2005 professional edition,no resolution on screen: http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=700532 http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=703037 http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=700882 old version 3dmark: http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=657017 http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=600522 http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=698659 http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=697097 http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=640594 http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=690554 http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=657015 http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=641360 2006 professional edition,no resolution on screen: http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=700536 http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=698660 http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=700883 old version 3dmark: http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=690558 http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=697098 http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=640596 http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=602405 ban?!?

http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=702827 http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=702828 not real score for this clocks and 64bit videocard. benchmark was not run using default settings. no resolution on screen.