- CBGPCS - 3x GeForce GTX 480 @ 888/1016MHz - 47265 marks 3DMark Vantage - Performance
- CBGPCS - 3x GeForce GTX 480 @ 888/1016MHz - 47265 marks 3DMark Vantage - Performance
-
Hadrware sharing spoted AGAIN?...
Massman, will mot post anymore on the site... when Im done putting together my backings I will contact site moderators.. Man I didnt mean to start WWIII
-
Hadrware sharing spoted AGAIN?...
Because I don't hesitate to call out on BS
-
Hadrware sharing spoted AGAIN?...
OK...Will sort out the fake screen shots, post them here in one week, and will not post anymore with the site until then. I dont want to kicked out of yet another forum...... Later dudes
-
Hadrware sharing spoted AGAIN?...
also whats up with this kitchen robot crap.....top 25 and I'm still in the kitchen????
-
Hadrware sharing spoted AGAIN?...
Whats up with CBGPCS?... Nothing but sick of all the sharing, and cheating on this site. You and I have discussed it many times Vince....Don't change your tune in a post now..... we have even seen screen shots done in photoshop, and I can tell being a photographer for over 25 years. If you would all like proof, give me a week and I will pull at least 20 screen shots that are fake! It has nothing to do with anybody beating scores I have had in the past. I really don't care about places or rankings, its a matter of honor. It is just common knowledge if you watch the submissions and the screen shots. This hole community of overclockers is so damm competitive that people (and I mean Many people) will do things dishonest to achieve a higher submission. That's is why will not post scores here anymore. If you all reading this feel we are wrong with this statement then you all need to study, watch, compare, evaluate, and analyze the submissions on a daily basis and you will see what we mean.
-
Hadrware sharing spoted AGAIN?...
Say what you want about how your benching Andre. We all know the deal...and its not just you dude its a lot of people submitting scores in that manner. I think this is all smoke and mirrors anyway. The only time you can rule out any foul play is in a public bench session with retail hardware. As I stated before I know a buddy at Intel and Had the i7 965 D0 for myself and for sale to the public before anyone except Fugger even saw one. Fuggers chip was coded 975 only because he gets them from Intel to boast about them on his website. the people who have the special hardware will hold the records.......FACT. Also why are you defending yourself so bad???? If it is not true what people think then just let it go..Why the posts, why all the photos, why you trying so hard to convince people what a few think is not true???...The way you keep going on and on and on its almost like your admitting some kind of guilt here
CBGPCS
Members
-
Joined
-
Last visited