CaNNon

It's cpu-z that does that koma, It seems to set the chip type of a clock range for some amd's (maybe all but i can't say for sure) and their may be differences in whatever they have biased the ranges on from version to version. I don't see any unlock done on the chip but it can also be done under the chip or at socket level. Might be best if you compared core names and stepping windows.

Is this a db error it's showing 2 in 16xpci-e and 1 in 16xpci=e And it's in the integrated chip version and on all runs both have gold cups? http://www.hwbot.org/ResultBrowseByVideoCard.do?gpuModelId=1300

Yea white, orange and green seem to be the only options. A edit to the CSS (if you guys use them) to make that white for all templates may be a good idea.

FF 3, to 3.0.5 all showed fine for me, try in your HWbot profile maybe a back ground color change might make it easier. I use the blue but your right the area is hard to see.

If you click the book under the submission the mods leave notes most are informative and easy to follow. One is showing version 1.63 and one shows version 2 (I only checked 2 that showed blocked).

K, now i know what i couldn't find it. Much thanks again.

Aaa... Way cool thanks!

Integrated ProSavage8™ 2D/3D Graphic Controller

Sorry to bother you again but that was the crush 17, I found it by mistake and thought it was the crush 11. It's the crush 11 i'm looking for. I didn't mean to confuse, sorry.

Thanks very Much!

I see quite a few, but the ones for hardware like that look bad, and once in the db people will start to believe. Place has become a great resource for me.

LOL It was a crush17

I didn't look up the chip, but it's possible to get the proper legs for a 1k and a variable if you have the pin outs.

Thanks guys!

This is it:

I don't at this time but I can take some, it's pretty plain except the ram sinks. And koma is right it took weeks benching and testing it on different setups. It goes high but it doesn't scale well with the cpu still don't understand that. Anyway thanks guys. I'll get a pic up for you and she still can be coaxed to go a bit higher.

I was wondering if we could get this added. Thanks!

Yea it does, I had to up the clocks a bit to better my old score and i made sure the area that reports settings was fully visible. THANKS AGAIN FOR YOUR HELP!

Thanks jmke It was the exact problem, I must have opened it and played with the settings.

OK thanks! I know where to look. I may have set that locked off with powerstrip or ati ...

Will any 7200's run nature? If that's the case please tell me how so i can get the bonus points!!!

Sorry jmke my display and cpu area settings, are the same as yours. I never changed any settings in 3dmark, I have no idea what i've done or what he means. I don't want to resubmit anything that's not correct and i have no problem rerunning if I know what the issue is.

http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=791652 10 Dec 2008 08:36 non default settings (crew) Woomack not ran at default settings because of hardware limitations () So what is the card missing to run 3dmark01/se? Will you be deleting all the 7200 scores now, I could understand if it was 05 or 06. Could someone please check this?

Thanks for posting that, sure helps me understand why it takes so long sometimes. Note to self: "don't want to be these guys when it is over 2000"

http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=745848 Result event log. date event user description 17 Jun 2008 03:40 created Cerbie manual online submission 17 Jun 2008 06:40 reported pxhx reported by user due to wrong hardware match (duron 1.3 is morgan.... not applebread. This processor is 1.8 (133x13.5).) 18 Jun 2008 02:09 reported DataNusse reported by user due to wrong hardware match (Move this score to the right category. Its a Appaloosa core in the scores. This category is Morgan (1.3Ghz). ) 19 Jun 2008 07:47 modified jmke manually modified by moderator (jmke) - reason: no reason given 19 Jun 2008 09:04 modified Cerbie manually modified by owner (Cerbie) - reason: no reason given 19 Jun 2008 09:04 modified Cerbie manually modified by owner (Cerbie) - reason: no reason given 19 Jun 2008 09:06 modified Cerbie manually modified by owner (Cerbie) - reason: no reason given 20 Jun 2008 12:01 reported pxhx reported by user due to wrong hardware match () 25 Jun 2008 12:09 reported pxhx reported by user due to wrong hardware match (Move this score to the right category. Its a Appaloosa core in the scores. This category is Morgan (1.3Ghz)²) 26 Jun 2008 06:46 reported Crazy666 reported by user due to wrong hardware match () 01 Jul 2008 05:59 reported pxhx reported by user due to wrong hardware match (wrong category) 03 Jul 2008 05:40 checked (crew) demiurg checked by a moderator ( ) This is wrong guys. Thats an applebreed 1800, all applebreed were 266 fsb and only include the last 3 durons made. The first of witch was 1400 then a 1600 and finally a 1800 also a 13.5 multi x 133.3 (fsb) = 1799.55 or duron 1800. The 50 models went 650, 750, 850 and finally the 950 Not only is it wrong in the wrong hardware category, but I doubt 1350 applebreed was ever even made!