Potapicus

Category - Pentium3 667 slot1 - http://www.hwbot.org/quickSearch.do?hardwareId=CPU_1456 All results of user inertiacreep (OutOfSpecs.Gr) are for processor with soc370. I asked Sadhiq to separate soc370 and slot1 - and what I have? some user, who post results 13/08 - put them into wrong category - and you know why? because there where no results - I edit my results right now. Please fix this wrong results!

Pentium-3 850 MHz - http://www.hwbot.org/quickSearch.do?hardwareId=CPU_1016 category - WinPrime1024. 1st place - 1h 50min 17sec 660ms - Cydoo (Syndrome-OC) - compare url is http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=583869 there is no screenshot and no verification link - and the cheksum is INVALID: Verfication: checksum: A6F78CC0 (invalid) and by the way - this user has 4 results in WPrime 1024 - and 3 results has invalid checksum - and there is nothing else, what can confirm the truth of this results.

5 days ago I wrote a post, but no reaction. Pentium-3 850 MHz - http://www.hwbot.org/quickSearch.do?hardwareId=CPU_1016 category - WinPrime1024. 1st place - 1h 50min 17sec 660ms - Cydoo (Syndrome-OC) - compare url is http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=583869 there is no screenshot and no verification link - and the cheksum is INVALID: Verfication: checksum: A6F78CC0 (invalid) and by the way - this user has 4 results in WPrime 1024 - and 3 results has invalid checksum - and there is nothing else, what can confirm the truth of this results.

Pentium-3 850 MHz - http://www.hwbot.org/quickSearch.do?hardwareId=CPU_1016 category - WinPrime1024. 1st place - 1h 50min 17sec 660ms - Cydoo (Syndrome-OC) - compare url is http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=583869 there is no screenshot and no verification link - and the cheksum is INVALID: Verfication: checksum: A6F78CC0 (invalid) and by the way - this user has 4 results in WPrime 1024 - and 3 results has invalid checksum - and there is nothing else, what can confirm the truth of this results.

So the maximum points for member=300?

Let's look at him - he can use LN2 and quad cpu and fresh 8800 ultra. And it's the difference - who can use fresh HW - use it, and others use old HW. What is the idea of limitation? Limits in old HW or all HW - for example maximum results in cpuz - 10 - and there is no difference, in what category user earn it - or 10xOLD or 3xOLD+7xNEW - something like this?

So, as I understand, someone wants to give a boints only for tests with new,fresh hardware? It will destroy the idea of competition. I don't have spare 2000 $ for new 2x8800 ULTRA and one more 1000 $ for 4x core processor. On my work there is a lot of machines with pentium or celeron 800 MHz MAXIMUM - and people work on it. Try to delete all old results - and many members delete hwbot from their life. At this moment I have motherboard with integrated Cyrux GX Media 166 MHz - and I'll make this machine to be work. And I'll try to test it. So, it's the administration right what to do - stay old hardware or delete it.