OptyTrooper Posted September 27, 2010 Posted September 27, 2010 (edited) If you look @ the submissions here:http://hwbot.org/hardware/processor/opteron_248_130nm?tab=2drankings#/manufacturer.rankings.do?applicationId=14&manufacturer=amd&hardwareTypeId=CPU_522&hardwareType=CPU&tabid=cpubenchmarks you'll see that 2X Opteron 148 130nm's are counted as 4 cores in all the submissions and single CPU are counted as 2X cores. There as never been an Opteron 248 made that had more than one core. Could you please correct this so scores are ranked properly. The Opteron 250 90nm is screwed up too. Edited September 27, 2010 by OptyTrooper Quote
OptyTrooper Posted September 27, 2010 Author Posted September 27, 2010 Anyone going to fix this? ^^ Example: wPrime 32m 4x CPU rank:not OptyTrooper’s best wPrime 32m submission, only best is ranked. wPrime 32m 2x Opteron 250 90nm rank: 1st out of 3, good for 2.0 points. 2 Opteron 250 CANNOT equal 4 CPU's. Quote
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.