CaNNon Posted December 2, 2008 Posted December 2, 2008 http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=745848 Result event log. date event user description 17 Jun 2008 03:40 created Cerbie manual online submission 17 Jun 2008 06:40 reported pxhx reported by user due to wrong hardware match (duron 1.3 is morgan.... not applebread. This processor is 1.8 (133x13.5).) 18 Jun 2008 02:09 reported DataNusse reported by user due to wrong hardware match (Move this score to the right category. Its a Appaloosa core in the scores. This category is Morgan (1.3Ghz). ) 19 Jun 2008 07:47 modified jmke manually modified by moderator (jmke) - reason: no reason given 19 Jun 2008 09:04 modified Cerbie manually modified by owner (Cerbie) - reason: no reason given 19 Jun 2008 09:04 modified Cerbie manually modified by owner (Cerbie) - reason: no reason given 19 Jun 2008 09:06 modified Cerbie manually modified by owner (Cerbie) - reason: no reason given 20 Jun 2008 12:01 reported pxhx reported by user due to wrong hardware match () 25 Jun 2008 12:09 reported pxhx reported by user due to wrong hardware match (Move this score to the right category. Its a Appaloosa core in the scores. This category is Morgan (1.3Ghz)²) 26 Jun 2008 06:46 reported Crazy666 reported by user due to wrong hardware match () 01 Jul 2008 05:59 reported pxhx reported by user due to wrong hardware match (wrong category) 03 Jul 2008 05:40 checked (crew) demiurg checked by a moderator ( ) This is wrong guys. Thats an applebreed 1800, all applebreed were 266 fsb and only include the last 3 durons made. The first of witch was 1400 then a 1600 and finally a 1800 also a 13.5 multi x 133.3 (fsb) = 1799.55 or duron 1800. The 50 models went 650, 750, 850 and finally the 950 Not only is it wrong in the wrong hardware category, but I doubt 1350 applebreed was ever even made! Quote
komadyret Posted December 14, 2008 Posted December 14, 2008 More ignored errors.. like the ones I posted in the "validated score still wrong" thread: http://www.hwbot.org/forum/showpost.php?p=25836&postcount=246 There is need for a cleanup on some areas, as points and awards are obviously given out on wrong submissions. Quote
CaNNon Posted December 14, 2008 Author Posted December 14, 2008 I see quite a few, but the ones for hardware like that look bad, and once in the db people will start to believe. Place has become a great resource for me. Quote
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.