MrCape Posted April 29, 2009 Share Posted April 29, 2009 Hi, I have submitted what I though tto be the winning superpi 1m for Q9650. My score is 9.562 - http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=847700 The listed #1 score is is 9.563 - http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=830806 Can I get that fixed or what? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Bartmasta Posted April 29, 2009 Share Posted April 29, 2009 this man is right someone fix it Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
knopflerbruce Posted April 30, 2009 Share Posted April 30, 2009 A permanent fix will be difficult, but you can always PM the owner of the other score, and ask him to delete, and reupload it. Then I think your score will be first. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Bartmasta Posted April 30, 2009 Share Posted April 30, 2009 Or you can try to beat your score, you only need 0.01 secs Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
MrCape Posted May 1, 2009 Author Share Posted May 1, 2009 (edited) I can't. I sold that chip yesterday. I wish I could do that! I don't get why that's not possible to fix though. I could have easily beaten this had I known when the setup was still together (LN, insulation etc.). How was I to know that wasn't a sufficient amount to be in first? Oh well. I think you should at least warn others about this, or did I miss that rule? So back to my topic, do hundredths of seconds count in 1M or not? Yes or no? PS - Not trying to be a pain, just to understand why this doesn't submit correctly and why there's no manual fix on your end. Edited May 1, 2009 by MrCape Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
MrCape Posted May 1, 2009 Author Share Posted May 1, 2009 I suppose I could just get a gigabyte P45 and take all the golds on air. Nah. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
MrCape Posted May 1, 2009 Author Share Posted May 1, 2009 Does it just round off the score to the nearest .005 automatically? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
MrCape Posted May 1, 2009 Author Share Posted May 1, 2009 Okay gotcha, was just a little confused about the functionality of the hundredths field because the example shows three digits. It's no big deal and if it's a pain in the butt you can totally forget about it. A little more on that confusion and why I ask some details - You know when you have all of the elements of a session going at once, cooling, bios settings maxed, tweaks once booted, etc., and you have it at pretty much al maxed... you try a few runs to hone on the max setting it will pass at, get your screen shot and it looks good... I always have the hwbot scores for the HW and bench I'm running sitting right next to me on a laptop so I make sure I can beat it. I'm sure you understand why it's good to know how exactly these submissions will work. That's all. I thank you for you for the great site and answers. Adios! Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.