steponz Posted June 22, 2010 Share Posted June 22, 2010 I would have done 6 core instead of 2. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
thebanik Posted June 22, 2010 Share Posted June 22, 2010 (edited) ^^^Yup, I should have, but while testing the motherboard on air, had cores disabled to check on efficiency at somewhat higher clocks, thats what started the degradation. Chip not able to do even 5.4G 6c6t now after LN2 and higher vcore while just a couple of weeks ago it was able to do 5.88G, . So its not as rapid as Hipro suggested but it surely is there... Edited June 22, 2010 by thebanik Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
steponz Posted June 22, 2010 Author Share Posted June 22, 2010 So far with my chip with 6 cores is running pretty sweet.. My cb was really low with 2 core.. so I didn't even have the option.. have you heard anything about doing 6 core 6 thread have degradation compared to 6 core 12 thread? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
thebanik Posted June 23, 2010 Share Posted June 23, 2010 my stupid chip has same cb and cbb with 2, 6 and 12t. i had been running 6c6t for quite a long time, and that didnt degrade it for sure Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
steponz Posted June 23, 2010 Author Share Posted June 23, 2010 I meant the cb on 2 core was really high -120 area... sorry to hear about the chip brotha... Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.