xCero Posted September 30, 2013 Posted September 30, 2013 (edited) looking some validation, I found this http://hwbot.org/submission/2431313_chris_666_3dmark06_geforce_gtx_780_44671_marks seeing good, I realized that the SM3 Score is very high compared with other validations look http://hwbot.org/submission/2413852_kio_3dmark06_geforce_gtx_780_43678_marks/ http://hwbot.org/submission/2402246_zupernico_3dmark06_geforce_gtx_780_43180_marks http://hwbot.org/submission/2424573_zzolio_3dmark06_geforce_gtx_780_45250_marks in all cases occupied a vga and cpu with higher frequencies quite getting a lower score for me is a rare score ,what do you think? bye (sorry for my english, I'm using translator) Edited September 30, 2013 by xCero change "Fake" for "Rare" in tittle Quote
der8auer Posted September 30, 2013 Posted September 30, 2013 There is a bug in one of the first versions of 3DMark2006 which can give you a boost in SM3.0 score. Not sure if this happened here but I had it few months ago and after checking with Futuremark they told me that the version I was using sometimes generated this higher SM3.0 score. Quote
pipejarcore Posted September 30, 2013 Posted September 30, 2013 sm3 bug or disable post processing? 4770k@5.5GHz - GPU@1113MHz, Canyon Flight 283fps http://hwbot.org/submission/2424573_zzolio_3dmark06_geforce_gtx_780_45250_marks/ 4770k@5.2GHz - GPU@1380, Canyon Flight fps 267fps (lower than zzolio fot the cpu frecuency 5.5 vs 5.2GHz) http://hwbot.org/submission/2420082_nom_yeslinux_3dmark06_geforce_gtx_780_45251_marks/ 4770k@4.9GHz - GPU@1048, Canyon Flight 310fps?? http://hwbot.org/submission/2431313_chris_666_3dmark06_geforce_gtx_780_44671_marks/ Quote
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.