[Hicookie - Core i5 670 @ 7098MHz - 5sec 944ms SuperPi]

nice!

[The official HWBOT OC Challenge February 2010 thread.]

410MHz done with a better CPU.

 

http://hwbot.org/community/submission/955374_oxyyy_reference_clock_lanparty_ut_nf3_250gb_410.47_mhz?tab=info

[placid - LANparty UT nF3 250Gb - 400.91 MHz Reference Clock]

Nice clocks!

 

what bios version is on your DFI mobo?

 

[oxyyy - Xeon W3520 @ 5053.4MHz - 5053.37 mhz CPU-Z]

thx, yep its the 0006 bios

[AndreYang - Core i3 540 %40 6585MHz - 6sec 469ms SuperPi]

286MHz bclk

[Rev3 Up and Running - Complaints, Ideas, Ramblings, Comments ... but no bugs]

bug? submited yesterday 2 scores but i can't view them in detail...

 

http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=937492

 

http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=937511

 

 

no one?

[Rev3 Up and Running - Complaints, Ideas, Ramblings, Comments ... but no bugs]

bug? submited yesterday 2 scores but i can't view them in detail...

 

http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=937492

 

http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=937511

[Videocard specifications requests : Geforce 6100 w/ 2 Pixel Shaders]

Ticket ID: 731

 

Priority: Medium

 

I don\'t know why, but there are some cards with 4 Pixel shaders and some with 2 Pixel shaders.\r\n\r\nexamples:\r\nhttp://hwbot.org/compare.do?resultId=796571\r\n\r\nhttp://hwbot.org/compare.do?resultId=716113

[ryba (PurePC.pl) - Sempron 140 @ 5654MHz - 25sec 750ms wPrime 32m]

wtf!? nice score!

[The official HWBOT Country Cup 2009 - stage 5: wPrime 32m thread.]

GOGO austria! We are #2!

[What's going on?]

just lol!

[What's going on?]

In total, 70 results have changed in rank or points, causing you to lose 28.6 hwboints in the past 7 days.

 

i have lost about 15 hwpoints...

[strange]

nice, points are back!

 

ty!

[strange]

same problem here...

 

lost, about 40 global points.

 

in normal view it shows the right points, but in view bench detail, i have very low points.

 

normal view:

 

detail view:

 

hope this will be fixed soon!

[-> Validated score still wrong? Let us know here]

http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=860458

 

SLI in non SLI category, cant report because its checked by moderator...

[Validation of HD2900 Pro]

hmm, there are many other results without screenshot.

 

So i think there should be a new rule for cards like HD 2900 Pro with various bus with?

[Validation of HD2900 Pro]

How can i check that its a 256bit or 512bit version?

 

Just look at this result, he has hided the Bus Width at the screen.

http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=822426

 

So how can i check the bus width in a futuremark compare link?

[-> Validated score still wrong? Let us know here]

http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=843058

 

Repored it 2 times but nothing happend. Benched with physX enabled...

[Athlon64 3000+ Newcastle S754]

http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=719498

 

this one should be moved to sockel 939 winchester.

 

And please take a look on all links in my first post.

[-> Validated score still wrong? Let us know here]

yes look @ verification link -> resolution 1024x768...

[Athlon64 3000+ Newcastle S754]

Some real S754 3000+ for compare:

 

30.000s http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=506810 3GHz

31.719s http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=562698 2,94GHz

33,641s http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=826332 2,75GHz full optimized sub timings

 

regards

[Athlon64 3000+ Newcastle S754]

Hi,

 

there are many sockel 939 results in the sockel 754 category of this cpu in Superpi.

 

I have reported some results 2 times but nothing changed, for now i cant report this results because of moderated by hwbot crew.

 

http://www.hwbot.org/listResults.do?cpuModelId=251&applicationId=3&filterUser=true&filterBlocked=true&limit=100

 

most of the results have'nt any verification.

 

http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=506883 no verification

 

http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=719498 2nd place, verification = link to forum post = sockel 939 Winchester

 

http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=525888 no verification

http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=511146 wrong verification, not possible with this speed

http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=504201 wrong verification, Description: A64 Mobile DTR 3000+ 2808MHz...

http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=507404 no verification, not possible with this speed

http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=505997 wrong verification, not possible with this speed

http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=504946 no verification, not possible with this speed

http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=504387 no verification, not possible with this speed

http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=504456 no verification, not possible with this speed

http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=727436 verification link to forum post = Ultra D = 939

http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=505245 no verification

http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=506003 no verification, not possible with this speed

http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=504279 wrong verification, A64 DTR 3000+@ 2.783ghz = mobile 3000+

http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=554687 no verification

http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=504529 no verification

http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=527638 no verification, not possible with 2575MHz

http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=506082 no verification, not possible with 2610MHz

[suspicious result core i7 920]

no its not bugged, there is an option in bios where u can choose "QPI Link Fast Mode: Enabled/Disable"

 

if you disable this option you got the half of QPI speed.

[-> Validated score still wrong? Let us know here]

oh, hi bro

 

Didnt know that u are a mod @ hwbot.org.

[-> Validated score still wrong? Let us know here]

I also reported a wrong entry three times and nothing happend:

 

http://www.hwbot.org/compare.do?resultId=796561

 

Wrong graphics chip in false categority, G43/G45=X4500