Olesius

nice result my friend NB freq is not low?

thank you my friends

doroste mehdi jan vali 346 ham bayad khub bere bala?!

doroste mehdi jan vali 346 ham bayad khub bere bala?!

thank you CAL930 did you use 1024mb size for coppy-wazza? yes i set them by cpu twker but really our sp32 prf is so low another problem, our 980 pass 3dmark 06 (6c,12th) @ 5.8 by 1.8vcore but do not pass 6ghz sp32m show us many many blue screens... it has an special setting for 6ghz sp 32m?

nice score my friend but a question: 1300 core clock by msi bios?? can you explain it?

no, we bought vantage and 06 register codes 1month ago so can repeat 8800gtx tests and give you orb valid link i say this result is fake!! how can massman prove it? http://hwbot.org/community/submission/950764_massman_wprime_32m_core_i5_661_7sec_329ms by 249.4mhz bclk, memory freq must be 748.2 but we see 721mhz !!!!!

in 346-347 ha jooon midan vase 7ghz

i see xp os, sp2 or sp3? for me 2k3 os has better performance but i think must test more xp versions... anyway team japan has great ocers

if I say massman's result is fake, how can he prove?? we want to make orb valid links for artifacted submitions and i think it is true let us to deffence ourself

we want any one (else massman) attend this issue because at first massman said us make valid orb link to show the results is not fake... but that time, my friend has sold his 8800gtx , some months later we found another 8800gtx and send a pm for massman to making valid links for artifacted results... but massman said us: how can new results prove previous results were not photoshopped? my email: Dear Pieter i think if previous results be photoshopped we can not repeat them, is it true? you said: "strange scores"!! and asked us orb link, at now we want to do it... what is the problem? and massman's email: How would new scores prove anything? :-) The score was not strange, but the screenshot/verification was. massman like "prove" word! so we say: massman, prove us this result is FAKE?!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

nice to see another amd overclocker in team

killing performance my friend

you are so great dear behzad!

first sub 7 with 980x ) show us @ 6.5ghz

first and latest test for competition! (cpu low clock because of vga testing) msi gtx480 with stock new bios ver! so we could not mod cold slow!

feels good with safe vcore

needs more raani?!

can I ask your vcore?

plz read the topic again my friend do you say if we have more same artifacted results it is ok? but one result is fake? massman say my friend had many same results with white lines... plz richba5tard or NeoForce or Turrican or Thor941 attend this issue

I got confused my friend... can you say your opinion about this 3dmark01 result (post #1)? is that fake?? (y/n) be sure, if my friends results were fake we did not pursue this issue for 5-6 months... we did not receive any good reply from admins (massman!) so had to open a topic in forum dear knopflerbruce, do you say we show more artifacted results? (but massman noticed just this result) anyway, can you say us this result is fake or photoshoped? score is ok and correct for that freq tnks edit: i found more detail our email: Anyway, if this result is "questionable" we must receive report or notification, am i right? we did not receive any email from hwbot crews for "overclockers" results... by first questionable result user account must be removed? massman's email: This "white line artifact" is present in many, many screenshots ... our email: if "Overclockers" wanted to submit Fake results, surely worked more with photoshop to got better pics! dear knopflerbruce you say if artifacted results be more its bug! but massman has banned my friend because of more artifacted results massman went R&D team, so we want another admin or moderator attend this issue

Sorry, I must explain beter: if anyone has reported your submition, will you get banned?? (really no!) at this problem we know the results are not fake! we wanted to provide orb valid link for submitions but did not accept it

thank you Alriin I remember your pcmark result by black lines and we had long conv about this issue... (mybe some one deleted it conv and result?!) anyway, i have another question (from everybody) : we have new reporting way in HWBOT.ORG?? so team capitans do not receive any report pm (and email), is it true? when a submition (s) did not reported in normal way, what could we do?? another note: admins do not ban every one by his first fake result (if we say this result is fake)! so, i want one of the admins (else massman) to reply me (and my team members) our friend (Overclockers) why got banned? http://hwbot.org/community/user/overclockers tnks