Everything posted by mirzet1976
- Vellinious - Radeon R9 290X @ 1310/1846MHz - 16005 marks 3DMark - Fire Strike
-
Vellinious - Radeon R9 290X @ 1310/1846MHz - 16005 marks 3DMark - Fire Strike
@Vellinious, your run is good is 10FPS gain for 220mhz higher memory and not 6FPS for 100mhz, or my to is not valid when I compare with this delevic`s 3DMark - Fire Strike score: 14522 marks with a Radeon R9 290 I have better graphics score in both tests at lower clocks 1315/1620 vs 1330/1770
-
Vellinious - Radeon R9 290X @ 1310/1846MHz - 16005 marks 3DMark - Fire Strike
when I compare his FPS and memory clock with my gain is 10 FPS for the 220MHz higher mem clock his - AMD Radeon R9 290X video card benchmark result - Intel Core i7-5820K Processor,ASUSTeK COMPUTER INC. X99-A - 1846mhz = 78.5 FPS mine - mirzet1976`s 3DMark - Fire Strike score: 11729 marks with a Radeon R9 290 - 1620mhz = 68.19FPS
- The official Novice Nimble 12 Thread
- The official Novice Nimble 12 Thread
-
what's wrong with my submission
One question, what's wrong with my submission and is withdrawn from the Novice Nimble 12? mirzet1976`s HWBOT x265 Benchmark - 1080p score: 21.51 fps with a FX-8320
-
Is this valid
Like the title says, is this valid run in 3DMark 2001 Se , where the rules says to use 7 of 7 tests and this submission is just with 1 of 7 done. superpatodonaldo`s 3DMark2001 SE score: 120816 marks with a Radeon R9 290
-
mus1mus - Radeon R9 290 - 20sec 684ms GPUPI - 1B
mus1mus, did you get error in GPUPI when you go over 1300MHz, my might before the 1330MHz that could unfold test without error and now can not over 1300MHz
-
Submission submission in wrong section
Mistake by bud_eric, he has run 3DMark Vantage and made submission in PCMark Vantage. http://hwbot.org/submission/2346166_bud_eric_pcmark_vantage_fx_8320_9103_marks
- Question
- Question
- Question