cdawall

http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=638563 http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=638571 http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=638562 honestly i agree with that on newer stuff but umm they dont have super clocks on either part listed it a FX5700 VIVO @ 500/35x anda PD930 @ 3.05ghz so not exactly jaw dropping clocks on either...and if you look all my recent stuff abides by all the new rules so why would i have cheated to get a total of ~6pts?

ok i just had 3 of my results blocked because they didn't comply to the new rules NeoForce put i did not have enough info they results are from before gpuz was out i konw this because i am a major member at techpowerup i was there for the first of the gpuz tests came out. i refuse to have to re-bench all of my old systems because the rules are different onto why they were deleted not enough info last time i checked it says very clearly on 3dmark what resolution i ran at yet that was a reason they were deleted? i'm sorry but nothing else in my profile is a cheat so why would i start now this is crap i worked hard to get that FX5700 to run those scores i will not rerun tests because i CAN'T i want my scores to be undeleted because its wrong to delete my old benchies just cause the rules changed. If this is how its going to be then EVERY OTHER BENCH LIKE IT BETTER GET DELETED AS WELL!

i like both currently i have used more AMD chips than intels PD 930 (no oc cause the mobo=gay but its a HTPC so i dont care) celeron D 351 @ ~3.8ghz 24/7, 4.2ghz max on a ECS P4M800-pro i would go higher but i'm capped at a +.03v to the cpu and its for my sister so it really doesn't matter AXP 2000+ tbred on a MSI K7N2-delta (went boom some time ago) 3000+ newcastle CG max oc 2.59ghz @1.81v (tried up to 2v with no increase in oc) on a Machspeed K8M8MS r2 3400+ clawhammer C0 @2.35ghz 1.56v 24/7 on a machspeed K8M8MS r2 (replaced my 3000+ and outperforms it @ 2.35ghz vs 2.59ghz) 3000+ venice still sitting in a box waiting for the pci-e vid card i ordered to show up on a DFI infinity ultra this should do 3ghz+ on air not much money as you can see so there all low end chips but i do my best getting them to run todays apps/games my 3400+ ran crysis when i mated it with a BFG 7800GS OC @ all med/high 1027x768 no cold bugs on my chips...and i doubt any intel chip can run @ 2v vcore and survive

i agree with pro they deserve the points if they can get these to clock!

there is already a CPUz comptition for cpus why not a GPUZ comptition for gpus?

i already new that i was just pointing out it was old hardware that made points only against identical cards and tey are so old few have posted results with them, but if i oc the heck outta my newcastle 3000+ i should get more points than if i oc the the heck outta my Celeron D 351 since there are 20X as many 3000+.

i think it is BS to do that leave the old hardware alone. I just upgraded from a Ti4200 a few weeks ago to do what your saying would kill off old legacy hardware like that. That thing is the 2nd place card for ti4200 64mb chips in AQ3. The scores for old parts is very low (only 1.7pts for a 2nd place score) leave the old parts alone a LOT of people still use them. I still have a celeron 433mhz on my desk and I STILL USE THAT! (for code testing it works fine)