-
Posts
178 -
Joined
-
Last visited
Content Type
Profiles
Forums
Events
Blogs
Posts posted by oanvoanc
-
-
nice chip and nice card
-
Gotcha. That doesn't apply to the Asus boards when you OC with turbo multi though does it? For example most of my chips can get to the windows load screen at 55x+ turbo multi but they can't actually get past the windows loading page into the desktop. Testing on SS now and tested high volts, doesn't help me get higher and none of these chips is going to actually finish booting 55x+.
this is a quite interesting information - thanks for sharing
edit: so finding the maximum multiplier seems to be more easy on gigabyte boards?
-
nice chip you got there
thumbs up!
-
would also like to know, where to get the rog expander
thanks man!
-
awesome cpu! nice run
push the card and the 03 score will fly
-
Thanks for the input guys!
Binning Sandy Bridge is extremely easy.
- use HS fan with easy mounting
- set Vcore to 1.55V
- disable HT and 2 cores (to not make it overheat with crappy HSF)
- increase multiplier
You just need to see the windows OS options, not actually boot into windows. If your CPU can show the different OS options, stability will just be function of Vcore and temperature. If it doesn't show the OS options, you will never get it stable anyways, so you might as well ditch the CPU.
Usually, it takes about 5 minutes to see if the CPU is good or not.
With some CPUs, you do have the issue that some multiplier is better than the other for stability. For instance, my current CPU can boot at 51x MAX (~ 5145MHz). When trying to run near this max speed, I have to use 49x instead of 50x multiplier because it's a lot more stable.
But, that's something you don't need to test. With BCLK adjustments, you'll never get 5200MHz going or so. Multiplier binning is the best way.
thanks for this hint.
im sure many people try to boot the chip, which is difficult due to bad heatspreader and the so caused high temperature raise during boot.
2600K - L051A863 #0108
max multiplier: 55x
just possible under cold due to massive heat under load:
51x100 @1,50v - air - boot ok - win 7 - ssd (60 degree celsius boot temp)
51x100 @1,50v - air - no boot - win xp -hdd (70 degree celsius boot temp)
51x100 @1,51v - air - boot ok - win xp -hdd (75 degree celsius boot temp)
52x100 @any voltage - air - no boot
55x100 @1,57v - ln2 - boot ok - win xp -hdd + win7 -ssd
totally benchstable:
wprime 1024: http://hwbot.org/community/submission/2124921_oanvoanc_wprime_1024m_core_i7_2600k_2min_19sec_281ms
3dmark06: http://www.overclockers.at/benchmarks/3dmark-2006-highscores_214357?postid=3143512#post3143512
-
-
wow!
dient Know, you did this!
-
thanks, will change it. sorry.
-
nice efficiency you got congrats!
-
dont know what to say...
im shocked and excited at the same time.
ive never seen anyboody, putting his heart so much into overclocking
grats!
-
Have you try to enable turbo and set all the multiplyers to 53?
yes, i tried this as well... thanks, but no gain
i have no idea if should be like that, but i can just set the first 3 cores to 53x - the last one i had to keep "auto" otherwise the first 3 multiplier settings reseted back to "auto".
-
Looks like we are all having issues with 52x+ multi on Jiggabyte boards. I'm also stuck with 52x, rarely 53x with UD3, no matter if the CPU is at -95°C or +35°C
Could it be also that there are just some chip that are unwilling to go beyond ~ 5300?
same problem here... no difference of temperature...
my 2600k boots fine with 52 multiplier, but doesnt boot with 53, not on my ud4 nor the ud7.
but i found out, i am able to boot with 53 multiplier, if i set the baseclock to 99 manually. anyway, no gain in total mhz
-
nice chip there
which bios did you use?
which batch?
thanks
-
nice chip there
-
Intel Sandy Bridge 2600K @4000Mhz vs. Intel Core i7-980x @4000Mhz
tested with windows xp - 32bit
graphics: gtx 580
...................2600k -- 980x --2600k@5000mhz
3dmark01 -- 87817 -- 58256 -- 103248
3dmark03 - 107079 - 102732 - 112333
3dmark05 -- 34527 -- 33866 -- 42283
3dmark06 -- 29963 -- 28278 -- 35461
pictures here
and here @5000mhz
-
there seems to be a typo in cell c44 - 5900mhz
the link doesnt confirm that
-
If the community asks for it, I'm more than ready to limit the 'normal overclocker' rankings to reasonably prices hardware and leave the pro rankings for all the expensive hardware.
haha, i see a new hot debate starting soon
what is reasonable priced? is it the common 1000 usd/euro for the high end chips?
how about the intel xeon x5680 or the upcoming x5690 for 1500 euro or even more?
-
as tiborr stated already, there are new biosses out since 11.1.2011 for gigabyte ud4 / ud5 / ud7.
will try the f7b and report back, if there is any improvement in terms of overclocking past multi 52 (for my chip) compared to the f6x released a few days ago.
-
i just hoped you wouldnt find this competition j/k
-
just played around with the ud4 and 2600k.
cpu is capable of 5,1ghz (51x100) (3dmark06 cpu-test stable) with the following settings:
internal cpu pll overvoltage: enabled
real time ratio changes in os: disabled
intel turbo boost tech.: auto
turbo ratios: auto
turbo power limit (watts): 1000 (auto works fine for me too)
core current limits (amps): 500 (auto works fine for me too)
cpu cores enabled: all
cpu multi threading: enabled
cpu enhanced halt (c1e): disabled
c3/c6 state support: disabled
cpu thermal monitor: disabled
cpu eist function: disabled
bi-directional prochot: auto
voltage settings:
load line calibration: enabled
cpu vcore: 1,50v
qpi/vtt voltage: 1,12v ("normal" works fine for me too)
system agent voltage: 1,135v ("normal" works fine for me too)
everything else: auto
achieved with watercooler (single radiator in cold water was necessary as the load temperatures above 70 degree celsius resulted in crashing 3dmark06)
for 5,2ghz i raised the vcore to 1,55volt
-
thanks for sharing.
i got a 2600K - L039B470 - #0220 (sn:2v036...) 5200mhz (spi stable / 3d not tested yet) on cold water 1,55v(bios)/1,53v(real).
-
nice
still waiting for the superpi 1m result
-
wow, thanks for the fast response.
im still on xp... superpi-purpose you know
still have no clue, why the q-flash tool didnt work.
anyway, i used the "old" @bios tool from the gigabyte driver disk, which came with the mainbaord...
the new version linked in my last edit worked now.
thanks
Sandy Bridge 2500K/2600K Batch and Serial Numbers
in Sandy Bridge (P67/Z68) OC
Posted
guys i found this one on a german site:
http://www.hardwareluxx.de/community/16325676-post1246.html
translated:
the guy used the same chip and same ram on different boards to figure out the max multiplier...