Mikecdm
-
Posts
511 -
Joined
-
Last visited
-
Days Won
4
Content Type
Profiles
Forums
Events
Blogs
Posts posted by Mikecdm
-
-
killing me with the 8 core,
-
So to clarify, we are only trying to reach the targets. One of the two targets will be the real target, but scores in between don't really matter? Only hitting the target or closes to the target without going over/under is what matters?
what to do if you have a xtu score whit -- for the temperature and a 0 for the Ghz?its a clean instal of win 7 whit sp1
i am not alowed to submit becos of this.
* The CPU load temperature must be higher than 25°C - your submission is incomplete.
edit:
i trayd 3 windows and 2 bios versions stil the same -- and 0 for temp and cpu speed
Use English version of windows or ask dancop. It seems he had this same issue and I think i remember something about him switching to an english version fixed it.
-
I'd go as far as removing the benchmark itself, but that's me.
If we can't get removal of the requirement for a link, then I'd have to agree with this.
-
Think this happened a few weeks ago. Something about Ney being a Nazi or communist.
-
Amazing Joe, just amazing.
-
All these scores, just WOW
-
-
Some of the old monthly competitions were fun. I miss them and we all know we need them competition points.
-
Honestly, bunny this bench off and be done with it.
I'd have to agree
-
Some would say that regular fire strike shouldn't even have globals.
-
My initial thought was, do we have to complain about every scenario where someone has an edge on points because of one reason or another. After reading the arguments, I can sort of agree with it a bit. Some of argument two, where WR points take the spot of huge global points. I'd also like to think that rewarding the WR points on a 3d benchmark should actually be for a bench that doesn't rely mostly on cpu power but gpu clocks.
-
You need that 2kw psu
-
Very nice and I agree, catzilla site is junk. Few can upload, then many have same issues.
-
Thanks everyone.
Mike- I don't know what it was. The last time that I tested it I only managed to get 1800 to run. The only thing I did different this time was to run a lot of voltage, used 2 psu, and unintentionally let it warm up a lot between runs. I even got about 1975 to pass gt's but I cold bugged it at the end. 2000 was a no go.
-
very nice hideo-san, seems 580 is coming back.
-
-
-
Thanks, this one was hard modded. Was only lazy on the 4870x2
-
Thanks, vgpu was 1.35v. Max I could get with software.
-
Up until this post, which was only a few days ago, I thought it was mystery amd cpu and gpu as well.
AMD CPU and 1x AMD GPU is already known; benchmark will be annouced on Dec 19 -
Nice card, memory clocks great. I have yet to find one that doesn't use Qimonda
-
Which is the xtu version that shows 0 GHz for cpu speed?
-
Kpc edition will do 2400mhz?
in 4way
-
Are you still going to be using your legacy OS in 2 years, or even 5 years from now while the rest of the world has moved on?
widows 8.1 is allowed in the benches that actually benefit from using a modern OS. The legacy OS will continue to be used as long as they continue to give the best results in specific benchmarks.
The official GIGABYTE Z97 - X99 BIG XTU Challenge thread.
in HWBOT Competitions
Posted
Thats a much better explanation than what the rules state.
Got more questions and a bit of criticism.
1-The winning target is not really kept secret. Once someone has reached the target, it shows that they have hit it. The image below shows this.
2-Does this mean that everyone that hit the "secret" target will receive one point. As of now, it looks like 3 of us will receive 1 point for the 2 core stage.
4-If we continue to hit the secret target from every stage until the end. Will the winner be the person who hit the target first for stage 1? If the trend continues until the end, it looks like Paulie_AU was the first to hit 339.