Jump to content
HWBOT Community Forums

Woomack

Members
  • Posts

    75
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Posts posted by Woomack

  1. I have no idea when it happened but I just noticed that all my 5820K results made in XTU are missing. There are still profiles in "My XTU profiles" which are automatically added after each submission but there is not a single result in the database even though results were made on 3 different motherboards and I never delete old results.

    Results were never reported. I have no idea if that's all, maybe something else is missing too but I just can't see it. There are too many results on my account to follow all. I've noticed that today when my friend asked about some comparison and I checked how high were my old results ... which are missing. For sure XTU on 5820K was exactly 2200.

     

    Edit:

    I had to enter My XTU profiles, find submission, click "analyzed", enter log, recalculate manually and now it's visible. It was not visible in the database before (benchmark, CPU list, personal results or submission browser). Maybe someone will have the same issue so I will leave this thread.

    http://hwbot.org/submission/2707881

    Maybe not any special result anymore but when something is missing then it's weird.

  2. Today leeghoofd blocked 2 of my PCMark submissions saying "No windows 8 or later for this benchmark and your cpu. Plz check the Benchmarks rules at the front page."

    Afaik I can use Win8 or later OS for Futuremark benchmarks as long as I provide screenshot + FM link where is clear info that result is valid in any way ( exception can be driver ). That's what I did and still got blocked.

     

    I just made 2 quick runs on 1700X so results are not any special and I could ignore that but it's not the first time I have something blocked and I make all within rules.

     

    http://hwbot.org/submission/3487820_woomack_pcmark_vantage_ryzen_7_1700x_22089_marks

     

    http://hwbot.org/submission/3487821_woomack_pcmark_7_ryzen_7_1700x_8438_marks

  3. Yes: "XTU Monitoring MUST show the CPU frequency DURING load. Results with monitoring disabled or not shown are invalid"

     

    As you see, on my screenshot is 5.3GHz all the time. It simply had to show 5.3GHz during load as in idle it's also 5.3GHz. On the graph there is straight line showing 5.3GHz.

    There is also no way it would throttle as it was made on cold.

     

    With current time how long CPU-Z is loading it's not that hard to pass default time of 5min on the graph.

     

    Result isn't any special and can compare it to any other 5820K at ~5.3GHz.

     

    Where? I checked TOP10 and they all "load time" in the graph.

     

    I said there are last couple of seconds/mins on the graphs on most screenshots. Big part of it is the same as on mine.

     

    I understand if I was hidding something, trying to cheat or if my result was the best in competition but it's just like searching for an issue here. I won't win anything here and I won't rerun it as this chip is already degrading. But really you had to remove my result which would be what ... 10th+ in the stage ? because I clicked print screen too late ?

  4. My result has been removed from the competition not because there is something really wrong or it's bugged etc but because "monitoring doesn't show load". It's because I was waiting too long to make a screenshot ... is it a reason to remove result from competition ?

     

    In rules is "XTU Monitoring MUST show the CPU frequency DURING load. Results with monitoring disabled or not shown are invalid"

    So it's showing CPU clock - 5.3GHz ( what is also in other window ) Monitoring isn't disabled and it's not hidden ... it just moved in time so you can't see full graph during the benchmark ... actually most results are missing most of this graph.

     

    http://hwbot.org/submission/2764707_woomack_xtu_core_i7_5820k_2121_marks

  5. Here you have cine R15 result:

    http://hwbot.org/submission/2706722_

     

    This chip runs @4.8GHz 1.32V on water ( result from yesterday ). When I finally got good CPU then 1st comment is that it has to be some kind of cheat ...

    /

    Ripjaws 4 @3010 10-13-15-15 1N , cache 4.8GHz+.

    All who know how this benchmark works know it's more than possible. Check l0ud_sil3nc3 result which is at 60MHz lower CPU clock, similar scalling.

×
×
  • Create New...