Jump to content
HWBOT Community Forums

Quake

Members
 View Profile  See their activity

  • Posts

    90

  • Joined

  • Last visited

 Content Type 

Posts posted by Quake

    HW Gurus OC Week

    in Extreme overclocking

    Posted

    We tried that too, but no luck with R3E BE

     

    We finally got lucky :) There was a lot of first places, a lot of 2nd, so it is the best for you to see the results. There was too much pictures to post it so we post just link for hwbot

     

     

    7900GT

    We were messing up a bit with a 7900GT card which proved to be a failure. -20 and -50 there were no difference, vgpu was at 1.45v, and we worked in parallel with the 2900XT, which has spent a lot of horrible LN2. The results for this card is not the best, but again not too bad.

     

    3D Mark 01 – 81017 – 7900GT @ 750/950 MHz – 4th place

    http://hwbot.org/submission/2193461_mare085_3dmark2001_se_geforce_7900_gt_81017_marks

     

    3D Mark 03 – 32778 – 7900GT @ 755/955 MHz – 5th place

    http://hwbot.org/submission/2193455_mare085_3dmark03_geforce_7900_gt_32778_marks

     

    3D Mark 05 – 14465 – 7900GT @ 765/970 MHz – 10th place

    http://hwbot.org/submission/2193457_mare085_3dmark05_geforce_7900_gt_14465_marks

     

    3D Mark 06 – 8336 – 7900GT @ 760/980 MHz – 12th place

    http://hwbot.org/submission/2193460_mare085_3dmark06_geforce_7900_gt_8336_marks

     

    Aquamark – 221047 – 7900GT @ 760/963 MHz – 12th place

    http://hwbot.org/submission/2193458_mare085_aquamark_geforce_7900_gt_221047_marks

     

     

    2900XT

    The card was spending a lot of LN2, A LOOOOOT, it was something terrible. For half a minute it will come from -60 to +10 if the pot is empty, so we spent too much LN2 on it. The results are not bad, but the card had CB at -80. VGPU was 1.65V, vmem at 2.45v, and the 2.5V VDDQ

     

    3D Mark 01 – 110500 – 2900XT @ 1,117/1,125 MHz – 4th place

    http://hwbot.org/submission/2192899_quake_3dmark2001_se_radeon_hd_2900_xt_512_mb_110500_marks

     

    3D Mark 03 – 55676 – 2900XT @ 1,171/1,125 MHz – 4th place

    http://hwbot.org/submission/2192903_quake_3dmark03_radeon_hd_2900_xt_512_mb_55676_marks

     

    3D Mark 05 – 36096 – 2900XT @ 1,158/1,107 MHz – 2nd place

    http://hwbot.org/submission/2192905_quake_3dmark05_radeon_hd_2900_xt_512_mb_36096_marks

     

    3D Mark 06 – 17281 – 2900XT @ 1,050/999 MHz – 7th place

    http://hwbot.org/submission/2192908_quake_3dmark06_radeon_hd_2900_xt_512_mb_17281_marks

     

    Aquamark – 324808 – 2900XT @ 1,144/1,089 MHz – 5th place

    http://hwbot.org/submission/2192906_quake_aquamark_radeon_hd_2900_xt_512_mb_324808_marks

     

     

    ASUS GTX 570 Direct Cu II

    The card ran at -65 ° C because CB was a little below 65°C. We did not get any software or BIOS, which would move CB a little or a possibility for more voltage via smart doctor or GPU tweak, which were limited to 1.213v so this was the best we could do

     

    3D Mark 01 – 126672 – GTX 570 @ 1,154/2,308/1,060 MHz – 1st place

    http://hwbot.org/submission/2192619_perica_barii_3dmark2001_se_geforce_gtx_570_126672_marks

     

    3D Mark 03 – 139349 – GTX 570 @ 1,154/2,308/1,060 MHz – 2nd place

    http://hwbot.org/submission/2192624_perica_barii_3dmark03_geforce_gtx_570_139349_marks

     

    3D Mark 05 – 51225 – GTX 570 @ 1,154/2,308/1,024 – 2nd place

    http://hwbot.org/submission/2192625_perica_barii_3dmark05_geforce_gtx_570_51225_marks

     

    3D Mark 06 – 40654 – GTX 570 @ 1,154/2,308/1,060 MHz – 2nd place

    http://hwbot.org/submission/2192627_perica_barii_3dmark06_geforce_gtx_570_40654_marks

     

    3D Mark 11 – 8246 – GTX 570 @ 1,101/2,202/1,004 MHz – 3rd place

    http://hwbot.org/submission/2192635_perica_barii_3dmark11___performance_geforce_gtx_570_8246_marks

     

    3D Mark Vantage – 126672 – GTX 570 @ 1,117/2,234/1,019 MHz – 8th place

    http://hwbot.org/submission/2192630_perica_barii_3dmark_vantage___performance_geforce_gtx_570_31202_marks

     

    Aquamark – 428877 – GTX 570 @ 1,190/2,380/1,071 MHz – 2nd place

    http://hwbot.org/submission/2192617_perica_barii_aquamark_geforce_gtx_570_428877_marks

     

    Unigine Heaven – 1684.51 – GTX 570 @ 1,070/2,140/1,004 MHz – 7th place

    http://hwbot.org/submission/2192637_perica_barii_unigine_heaven___xtreme_preset_dx11_geforce_gtx_570_1684.51_dx11_marks

     

     

    8800GTX

    Here things really started to get better. The card ran at -120 ° C, vgpu was 1.6V and the memory at 2.15V. With the card, we took three 1st places and one 2nd place.

     

    3D Mark 01 – 99789 – 8800GTX @ 792/999 MHz – 25. place (out of LN2)

    http://hwbot.org/submission/2193273_perica_barii_3dmark2001_se_geforce_8800_gtx_99789_marks

     

    3D Mark 03 – 67549 – 8800GTX @ 945/2,106/1,269 MHz – 1st place

    http://hwbot.org/submission/2193222_perica_barii_3dmark03_geforce_8800_gtx_67549_marks

     

    3D Mark 05 – 38021 – 8800GTX @ 945/2,052/1,269 MHz – 1st place

    http://hwbot.org/submission/2193227_perica_barii_3dmark05_geforce_8800_gtx_38021_marks

     

    3D Mark 06 – 23322 – 8800GTX @ 972/1,998/1,188 MHz – 2nd place

    http://hwbot.org/submission/2193268_perica_barii_3dmark06_geforce_8800_gtx_23322_marks

     

    Aquamark – 403925 – 8800GTX @ 999/2,052/1,269 MHz – 1st place

    http://hwbot.org/submission/2193270_perica_barii_aquamark_geforce_8800_gtx_403925_marks

     

     

    Intel Core i7 2600k

    In addition, we did some wPrime results with other 2600k processor.

    Wprime 32M - 4sec 265ms – Intel Core i7 2600k @ 5,654MHz – 48th place

    http://hwbot.org/submission/2193140_perica_barii_wprime_32m_core_i7_2600k_4sec_265ms

     

    Wprime 1024M - 135sec 155ms – Intel Core i7 2600k @ 5,659MHz – 48th place

    http://hwbot.org/submission/2193149_perica_barii_wprime_1024m_core_i7_2600k_135sec_155ms

    HW Gurus OC Week

    in Extreme overclocking

    Posted · Edited by Quake

    A couple of days are behind us and we wanted to show you what we have managed to do:

    Intel Core i7 920 D0

    The processor have BCLK wall at 250MHz and don’t like to work without HT and two cores, so we had to keep all cores + HT on. Another thing is that it doesn’t like cold, -80 ° C maximum, everything below that is causing strange behavior of the system.

     

    Super Pi 1M – 7.594s – 5256MHz @ 1.54v, NB 4756 @ 1.48v, RAM 2000MHz @ 7-7-6

    86631456.th.jpg

     

    Super Pi 32M – 6:58.078s – 5197MHz @ 1.54v, NB 4700 @ 1.48v, RAM 2000MHz @ 7-7-6

    32mvg.th.jpg

     

    Pifast - 16.05 – 5257MHz @ 1.535v, NB 4756 @ 1.48v, RAM 2000MHz @ 7-7-6

    pifast.th.jpg

     

    Wprime 32M – 4.624s – 5197MHz @ 1.54v, NB 4700 @ 1.48v, RAM 2000MHz @ 7-7-6

    wprime32m.th.jpg

     

    Wprime 1024M – 149.125s – 5131MHz @ 1.54v, NB 4642 @ 1.48v, RAM 2000MHz @ 7-7-6

    wprime1024m.th.jpg

     

    img8248b.th.jpg img8249p.th.jpg img8250u.th.jpg img8280s.th.jpg

     

    Then we quickly run wPrime so we could know on what clocks we can run Intel Core i7 2600k

     

    Wprime 32M – 4.399 – Intel 2600k @ 5591MHz, 1084MHz @ 7-7-7

    wprime32m2600k.th.jpg

     

    Wprime 1024M – 137.498 – Intel 2600k @ 5591MHz, 1084MHz @ 7-7-7

    wprime1024m2600k.th.jpg

     

    img8224du.th.jpg img8225o.th.jpg img8226f.th.jpg

     

     

    Zotac 8800GT 512MB

    It worked over 130°C for about 6-7h of benching. On the card we did VGPU and OCP, but for memory we forgot to do. Day after we did that also but no help for memory frequency. Voltage card was around 1.45v, there was no OVP till 1.55V, but the cards at that voltage almost died. The memory on the card was very strange, everything above 1000MHz was on the edge of cracking (perhaps due to excessive cold). Vantage caused a lot of the problems. We benched it for about 3-4h but for some reason we were getting very low results. We tried Vista and 7, old, new drivers, factory clocks, practically everything, but it just didn’t worked.

     

    3D Mark 2001 – 94402 – 8800GT @ 846/987/2106

    013dmark8800gt.th.jpg

     

    3D Mark 2003 – 58788 – 8800GT @ 994/999/2430

    58788058800gt.th.jpg

     

    3D Mark 2005 – 37673 – 8800GT @ 999/1053/2592

    37673038800gt.th.jpg

     

    3D Mark 2006 – 22052 – 8800GT @ 999/1053/2592

    22052068800gt.th.jpg

     

    3D Mark Vantage – 8750 – 8800GT @ 999/1044/2430

    p8750.th.jpg

     

    Aquamark – 391 121 – 8800GT @ 999/1053/2592

    aqua391121.th.jpg

     

    img8266yu.th.jpg img8268v.th.jpg img8273es.th.jpg img8285b.th.jpg img8294m.th.jpg

     

     

    ASUS GTX 460 TOP 768MB.

    The card has a non-standard holes so we couldn’t mount the pot on the card, but we did put Megahalems cooler and the maximum temperature on the card was 30°C

     

    3D Mark 2003 – 89902 – GTX 460 768MB @ 980/1090

    8990203gtx460.th.jpg

     

    3D Mark 2005 – 47913 – GTX 460 768MB @ 1000/1095

    4791305gtx460.th.jpg

     

    3D Mark 2006 – 33359– GTX 460 768MB @ 1050/1117

    3335906gtx460.th.jpg

     

    Aquamark – 401 774 – GTX 460 768MB @ 1032/1120

    401774.th.jpg

     

    img8312o.th.jpg img8314m.th.jpg img8315x.th.jpg

     

    ASUS DirectCu II GTX 570

    All the time we had a problems with low results, namely HDR3.0 in 06, low Vantage and very low Nature scores. This morning we finally figured it out what the problem was (mbo), so that the results of the GTX 570 will definitely be improved, since the results should be okay in terms of perf with other motherboard. ASUS DirectCu II GTX 570 had a CB at -60 ° C, the maximum voltage was 1.213v, memory doesn’t like high frequency so we have been very limited.

     

    3D Mark 2003 – 119499 – GTX 570 @ 980/1090

    03119499.th.jpg

     

    3D Mark 2005 – 49706 – GTX 570 @ 1164/1019

    054970611641019.th.jpg

     

    3D Mark 2006 – 38581 – GTX 570 @ 1148/1024

    0638581.th.jpg

     

    3D Mark Vantage – 30803 – GTX 570 @ 1106/1004

    vantage3080311061004.th.jpg

     

    Aquamark – 417 227 – GTX 570 @ 1211/1024

    aqua417227gtx570.th.jpg

     

    img8274g.th.jpg img8275s.th.jpg img8276m.th.jpg img8297c.th.jpg

     

    So far, that would be all. Currently we are running the GTX 570 and you can see all the progress live right now on http://www.livestream.com / hwgurus

     

    A few photos and movies

     

    sudionici.th.jpg setup1.th.jpg setup2dx.th.jpg setup3.th.jpg

     

    HW Gurus OC Week

    in Extreme overclocking

    Posted · Edited by Quake

    HW Gurus is officially launched

     

    Test plan is that next week or two days we achieve at least 2000 points for HW Gurus team, and it is not just about hardware points which proves by the fact that there is 5 x GTX 580 cards. During testing, there will be Perica_barii, Dekara, Quake, Gameaddict, dejobar, trut_bar, tonino2, Mare085. During the entire test we will be benching three separate systems with many hardwares, while at the same time will livestream with at least 3 cameras and simultaneous updating scores on forums. Our goal is to have fun, which is certainly the most important in this story, but also there is no easy benching :)

     

    hwglogo1.png

     

    First of all, we would like to thank some sponsors who have supported us with some ofhardwares that was great help to us. ASUS primarily in supporting motherboards and lot of graphics cards, ECS in the boards. This is just one of many HW Gurus OC Week gatherings, as we are planing to expand this to a far higher level and hopefully we will get support from other manufacturers.

     

    asuslogo1.png

     

    ecslogo.jpg

     

    geillogo1.png

     

    I hope you will follow us via livestream and we hope that we will not have many problems in terms of hardware:) Since we have a lot of hardware, we hope that we will tested all. How would you be interested, the following pictures are what we are going to test, best regards! :)

     

     

     

     

    LIST OF HARDWARE

    GPU

    2x ASUS Geforce GTX 580 Matrix Platinum

    1x ASUS Geforce GTX 570 DirectCU II

    2x ASUS Radeon HD 5870 Matrix Platinum

    1x ASUS Geforce GTX 460 TOP

    1x ASUS Radeon HD 2900XT

    1x ASUS Radeon X1950XTX

     

    4x Geforce 8800GT

    2x Geforce 8800GTS 320MB

    1x Geforce 8800GTS 512MB

    2x Geforce 8800GTS 640MB

    5x Geforce 8800GTX

    2x Geforce 9800GX2

     

    3x MSI Geforce GTX 580 Lightning

    1x EVGA Geforce GTX 285 Classified (lack of EVBot)

    1x nVidia Geforce 8600GT

    1x ATI Radeon HD 4870X2

     

    CPU

    3x Intel Core i7 990x

    1x Intel Core i7 920

    3x Intel Core i7 2600k

    1x Intel Core i5 2500k

    1x Intel Core i5 670

    1x Intel Core 2 Duo E8600

     

    RAM

    2x 2x2GB G.Skill RipjawsX 2133MHz 8-9-8

    1x 3x2GB Corsair Dominator GTX2 2250MHz

    3x 3x2GB OCZ Blade 2000MHz 7-8-7

    2x 2x2GB Transcend Axe Extreme 2400MHz 9-11-9

     

    MBO

    1x ASUS Rampage III Extreme Black Edition

    1x ASUS Maximus IV Extreme (P67 rev. B2)

    1x ASUS P8P67

    1x ASUS P8P67 WS

    1x ASUS Rampage Extreme

    1x ASUS Commando

    1x ECS P67H2-A Black Series

    1x ECS P67H2-A2 Black Series

    1x EVGA P55 Classified 200

    2x EVGA P67 FTW

     

    PSU

    2x Corsair AX1200W

    1x Antec Truepower Quattro 1200W

    1x Enermax Galaxy 1000W

     

    img8194q.th.jpg img8202d.th.jpg img8206a.th.jpg

     

    img8214k.th.jpg img8217q.th.jpgimg8218w.th.jpg

    The REV4 public test server! (feedback welcome)

    in HWBOT Rev.4

    Posted

    CPU-Z

    GPU-Z

    max memory speed

    max bus speed

    max ...

     

    Those all are just maximum operating frequencies and they shouldn't be awarded with points.

    In new revision those will get HW points but no global points. This is very locigal idea. (Except GPU-Z)

     

    This is a good change!

     

    And when you are testing e.g. super pi, that isn't maximum operating frequencies? CPU-Z is a test to see what is the maximum your cpu could handle and it is always great to see high frequency

     

    After all, aren't we a community that should together decide on such things, not just 1,2,3... people? If a lot of us want it to be included, then what is the obstacle?

    The REV4 public test server! (feedback welcome)

    in HWBOT Rev.4

    Posted

    Fyi, I actually calculated the amount of points you have if you're #1 everywhere

     

    CPU -> 38109,4

    GPU -> 27993,1

     

    In other words: more rankings for GPU, but more points for CPU rankings :)

     

    Why then don't include 3D Mark 11 for points instead to cut cpu points?

     

    CPU-Z is great to bench, when you need to push it to the end, I would really like to see it as global points

×
×
  • Create New...