SteveRo
-
Posts
1084 -
Joined
-
Last visited
Content Type
Profiles
Forums
Events
Blogs
Posts posted by SteveRo
-
-
-
Thanks guys! Q6600 next!
-
Well done - great score!
-
^^ tess already disabled - something else causing bad efficiency
-
wow - nice clock!
-
yep - 64 cpu - you are racking them up!
-
^^ yes but their won't be much incentive to make the runs if they are only worth 10 points each
-
AMD says 16 cores per chip so this should be a good submission.
-
chips are 6x chips but run as 2x each to get higher cpu multi
Does this trick run in L56** ?
It should.
-
^^ That link does say 16 core per chip!
-
That link does say 16 core per chip - cpuz reporting it wrong?
-
Again - isn't this 8x4=32cores not 64 right?
-
Again I think - isn't this 8x4=32cores?
-
Nice but isn't this 8x3=24 cores? when did HT start to count as cores?
-
chips are 6x chips but run as 2x each to get higher cpu multi
-
Raul - With this setup you can only get these clocks by running only 2 core on each chip, if you go to full cores and HT-on you get 18x multi for both.
-
There are some thread titles I just shouldn't click on.
+1
-
^^ 3x2GB Dominator GT 2kC7 and 3x2GB Ripjaws 2133C7 - for this bclock - this was the max memory multiplier the mobo gave me.
-
32 threads - very nice!
-
^^ does the bot s/w know it's 10x cpu though?
-
^^ could we get away with just one cpu category - something like maybe: sr-2 "Mutt" ?? :)
-
-
^^ look in the cpuz "specification" line
-
Wow - great work Mr. Honda!
Aristidis - Core i7 2600K @ 5956MHz - 53677 marks PCMark 2005
in Result Discussions
Posted
Well done - congrats on WR - you are quick!