Tiltevros
-
Posts
55 -
Joined
-
Last visited
Content Type
Profiles
Forums
Events
Blogs
Posts posted by Tiltevros
-
-
Bravo Stelious
Keep it up -
Do we have a comeback??? Aristidis is have a party on 3770k and physics score
-
-
:woot: just give it a rest dude. quit crying. this isnt an elaborate conspiracy against all the poor little overclockers. if you dont like der8auer, the hwbot staff in general, or the hwbot organization, then go overclock by yourself. then you and your friends can share scores with each other and feel cool.
and i am not singling you out (not completely)... this applies to everyone who is still crying about JL/Mad222
:cry:
:baby:
:battle:
1. crying??? if i have a different opinion than u is crying???? lol !!!
2. read again my post and then tell me where do i say that i dont like der8auer or hw staff or what ever...
3. i just make a question about sharing is that so bad????
loool
best regards
Tilt
-
If they had not admitted, would you be able to tell for a fact?
me no cause i am unexperienced on that sector.
others like slam maybe yes..
-
have you ever seen them using the same setup and sharing results with your own eyes for fact?
they just admit that didnt they????
-
#2. CPU frequency/voltage is too similar
The argument here would be that no two CPUs respond the same to voltage and temperature, so it would be highly unlikely that there would be two CPUs doing within 20MHz of each other at the same voltage level. Der8auer has indicated that both of his CPUs run within that same range of frequency at the same voltage level. So, it is in fact possible to have two of these similarly acting CPUs.
The likelihood of that happening might seems slim at first sight, but is quite hard to determine exactly. There are two other results in the Wprime1024M ranking that were done at same voltage within 20MHz from two different users, so Der8auer is not an exception.
Do u all know that Mr Lamm and Mr MAD222 have 2 identicals Cpu's for fact?? have u ever seen them with your own eyes operating 2 setups with same ghz and voltage? can u present the proof for those CPU's and not from Mr Der8auer?? why do u taking Mr Der8auer as a proof of existance???
For me the only Fact that i could understand and say nothing about it.. is 2 mobos with those cpu's on benching at the same time and proof them selfs.
-
Lol... did you follow the threads about sharing and rules? You're not the first to say you're looking after them ^^
But sharing is sharing:
For 2D : RAM/MOBO/HDD etc...=> sharing allowed but no CPU!
For 3D : all you want but no graphic card
That's clear to me!
yeah im very intresting to see the rules... i play here im sumbiting scores
isnt a MUST to me to know and understand the Rules???
you said about CPU's that its not allowed to share... how do they know that we r not sharing??
how it will be checked????
i see that many cpu's can do same ghz with same volts how u will check it if i own it or not??
i could just take my friends staff bench take points and glory and noone can say anything about it.. right??? same think same deal
-
Nope mate. It's clearly what's forbiden and called sharing in the rules... sorry. But it's the the bottom line here
i totally agree with u...
but u didnt understand me
let me explain what i want to say with some more details..
in school we wrote test right???
we all used same pencil B2 same paper...
the students that didnt have pencils could share between them right??? (eg. ok i have 2 pencils take one from me and at the end give it to me). Thats cool with me
sharing equipment is a nice way to support ur friends but the line its there for me...
Its like in maths u can have a calculator with u share it with others but not just give the answer to the other...
An Eg from my life...
Been in university for many many years i learn many thinks....
One of my friends had a papper to give for a class that he didnt like(maybe he didnt understand it) and he took from an older student his papper and he rewrite it with a few extra points...
Can u imagine what happend when the teacher find out about it????
I think that this subject is similar to this thread...
Rules are ment to follow no matter who he/she is or nomatter what version we have...
and something else.... i think that this thing could be solved much much easer if the rules are on a place that ALL can see them... in every forum or community i have entered the rules are on a sticky thread... where r they???
-
and if we both post a result with own runs???
the first one tries out his skill and then the other one is that a forbiten think???
like in school same papper same book same test but different results.
-
plz clear something to me..
i have the gear (cpu mems mobos gpus etc...) and let my friend play on it (benching for our story) and me only watch and put LN2 on the pots who has the result?? who will post the sumbition??? who will get the points???
-
so the penalty for mixing results to each other is 1 month penalty??? is that for all or only for Mr. Lam?
-
we learned and how we insulate ...
But going off topic...
-
look at ur screen that u post where do i start
hmmm
4 M4's even on FP my dear friend whitch is 150.000 tops limitation u canot have 2.1GB on 4k random..
having that speed that they r more than factory announced speed its little bit wierd dont u think??
especially without caching involved as u say on ur post.
Direct speaking with Tech department of LSI in Europe they saying to get 300.000 IOPS in 4k random
u need least 12 drives.. we all remember that testing with IT FR the limitation of the HBA (a controller that u can bypass the IR) its 250.000 IOPs with 8 drives.
Now seeing the Crystal mark bench that u post... ok 6.1GB/s on 512B files??? I didnt expect that to approve Computurd
especially (im saying it again and again) with out Cache system...now if u think that im wrong by saying that just remember that fancy cache is easy to switch ON and OFF while u r benching that why u dont see high latencies at the end.
But this is not the point to give a guide on Fancy Cache.
ok lets go to basic maths then...
M4 performs on papper 45k 4k random on read right??? right...
http://www.crucial.com/store/ssd.aspx
ok he is using 4 drives of 64GB each.... whitch means 45x4=180 whitch is 180.000 IOPS @ 4k random...
that is... 720MB/s in 4k random 64Q all this is on perfect conditions that the drive perfoms
what is writen on papper..
now explane to me how in hell it performs 2.1GB/s without cache... with only 4 drives....
ahh btw
http://www.lsi.com/channel/products/storagesw/Pages/MegaRAIDFastPathSoftware.aspx
the 9260 is the 2108-based MegaRAID controller...
but ok i will say that also my result like posted here is Legit right TransAm and Computurd??
with and without FP
wowow i forgot... it's with 2 drives X25m's.... G2
-
ok u think that i cheat right??? Give me one spot that u or Ur team think that i cheat....
even ur Guru Computurd or Mike accept my Score as a LEGIT....
Plz Next Time THINK before u say something Especially on Cheating....
-
cell shock???WTF
-
thats my boy!!!!!!!!!!!!!
ahahhaahah
go go go go Stelaras
-
-
happy to see u learning something from my sector
Keep the good work and u will break everything on ur way
-
why do u use fancy cache to do this test...??
-
u need competition on this???
-
kamboommmmmmmmmmm!!!!
-
just try Pcmark Vantage
its more secure for now steveR0??? Pr0???? long time to see u playing there -
Really??????????????? Stop using Windows Compresion..... Its not legal its same as Dynamic Drive..... We re not fools.... Storage Sector feeds our home.... so plz dont post CPU/Ram sencitive caching things...
LSI 9260 is limited to 76.000 IOPS in IR controler by its own it only perform more than that in Dynamic or IT frimware... whitch is the same us ES cpu's or custom Frimware... Do u want really to start doing this on WR's?
Stelaras - GeForce 9800 GTX( ) @ 860/1330MHz - 56498 marks 3DMark2001 SE
in Result Discussions
Posted