
Gluvocio
Members-
Posts
826 -
Joined
-
Last visited
Content Type
Profiles
Forums
Events
Blogs
Everything posted by Gluvocio
-
Mikecdm - Core 2 Q6600 (2.4Ghz) @ 4500MHz - 38701 marks PCMark 2005
Gluvocio replied to Moose83's topic in Result Discussions
set 1.8v and that memories works 1800+ cl6-6-5-18 Welcome back mike & wonderful chip -
Gluvocio - Radeon HD 3870 @ 1066/1395MHz - 36193 marks 3DMark05
Gluvocio replied to Andrix85's topic in Result Discussions
maybe or maybe this chip likes z77 or x57 multiplier http://valid.canardpc.com/show_oc.php?id=2587848 -
topdog - Sempron 145 @ 6398MHz - 719sec 877ms wPrime 1024m
Gluvocio replied to Strat's topic in Result Discussions
KABOOM D: -
CherV - FX-8350 @ 8431.9MHz - 8431.91 mhz CPU Frequency
Gluvocio replied to Apfelkuchen's topic in Result Discussions
She's not a sir, bro... Great freq. Lady -
Gluvocio - Radeon HD 3870 @ 1066/1359MHz - 17394 marks 3DMark06
Gluvocio replied to Farjam's topic in Result Discussions
thank you much sir ! with this CPU you're 90% GPU-limited. I've one SS only, so I decided to use it on VGA . I'm happy I did so -
Clarification in PCMark'05 about Tweaks // Tricks allowed
Gluvocio replied to Sweet's topic in Benchmark software
well guys... the issue, I think, is not to decide if it's legal or not a thing have been used for years. and for my tests without rst I noticed Gen. usage is the subtest more affected by this utility. Virus scan is high (about gbps ) even if there is not Write-back enabled or bios is made "bios mode" ( press Ctrl+I ) The way how the test works seem to allow this since when it born. I saw similar sequential read on crystalDiskMark or other software... maybe a little under 1000mb/s , but anyway they were high. Guys, I've seen 150+ mb/s made by a single mechanical disk. That subtest hits high score since the dawn of time. With raid you began to see 1000+ scores and noticed this. But I think it's the way this subtest works. The real issue, dear mates, should be (onboard RAM) write-caching of this utility , that affect much Gen.usage subtest. It's a kind of software-ram-caching. Equaliti should be allow or disallow ram-caching on write. I think if disallow, decision should be applied to new scores/new CPUs ...one guy that played 1 year+ ago with e6600 / 2500k / i7 920 , never thinked it could be disallowed. I prefer it whould be allowed, to put under conditions to play nicely people w/out controller too... But for the same reason there should be allowed write-caching softwares with single disk, for equality. Outcome it's not my personal trouble'cause I've controller, but I'd like to contribute with my ideas on this bench I've played for years. -
CherV - FX-8350 @ 8368.8MHz - 8368.8 mhz CPU Frequency
Gluvocio replied to Blackbolt's topic in Result Discussions
wonderful result, well done lady -
Gluvocio - Celeron LGA775 352 @ 6183MHz - 6183 mhz CPU Frequency
Gluvocio replied to LaTour's topic in Result Discussions
I'm curious too... I hope to have soon LN2 ti test this chip and I hope it will that like cold . -
Andrix85 - Core i7 2600K @ 5687MHz - 38274 marks PCMark 2005
Gluvocio replied to gigioracing's topic in Result Discussions
un test passa da 75mb/s a 300-500 mb/s , mentre l'altro test passa da 211 MB/s a 1000-1600 MB/s ;-) direi di si..