jcmarfilph

set the number of cores in Advance Settings to 2

set the number of cores in Advance Settings to 2

No problem. Try to reach the other 3DMarks too and Aquamark =D

You can take this benchmark whenever you want. I just showed you that there is a flaw in your submission. Search the HWBOT and compare your Car Chase High Details and other High Details results. =D

@verdict: I am also using Fusion Utility so I know the improvement it will give. And I think your fellas is also using that. I don't think DDR3 Memory will boost a higher score than a 540Mhz difference in processor speed. Overclocking the processor will also overclock the memory so that should give higher improvements.

I know XPSP3 and DDR3 will give improvement but not that high. Your High Details scores are equivalent to 14-15K 3DMark run. So it is clearly a cheat or a bug.

I'd call it a bug if not a cheat. =D Evidence is very clear in the FPS window. It should be similar to my latest run.

Check the score of your fella http://hwbot.org/community/submission/1061830_verdict_fx_3dmark_2001_mobility_radeon_hd_4200_11476_marks Would you believe that?

I don't think a tweaked OS can give you additional 2.5-3k score. I don't know but something is wrong with your submission. I am telling you, there is no way you can reach my score unless processor or IGP is overclocked to hell. Mine and Retromayday's scores in other 3DMarks are way higher than yours.

See the score of your fella. His Turion M520 is 2.64Ghz and he only got 9.8k, yours is a mere 2.1Ghz. http://hwbot.org/signature.img?iid=408482&thumb=false&iehack=.jpg

I think there are some inconsistencies in this score. I have checked the FPS in my 10k run. http://img441.imageshack.us/img441/1622/3dmark01run1.jpg All Low Details and Nature score are higher than yours but your High Details are higher. My processor is overclocked too so there is no way for a 2.1Ghz processor to exceed a 2.5Ghz+ processor in 3DMark01. And if your score is higher than mine, why can't you reach the other 3DMark scores? So how would you explain that?

haha you snatched this one from me again. i'll get back soon. =D

Mine is Toshiba L555D-S7005. Is that really ATI Mobility Radeon 4200? You've got a Danube laptop which means integrated graphics should be ATI 4250 (clocked higher than ATI 4200). If that is then it is a mismatched but I will allow it though. =D

What is the model of your laptop?

I guess I will need another backup run just in case you overtake again. =D See if you can overclock the processor. Let's hit the 12k Mark

I guess the RAM and its timings made a lot of difference.

The stock speed score should be somewhere around 8.5 - 9.5K only Hmmm. You must have done a very good or special tweaks or no tweak at all? =D

nice run. is this really in all stock clocks?

you were able to overclocked the GPU Mem to 1388?

overclock the damn thing. Use SetFSB =D

overclock the damn thing. Use SetFSB =D

Looks like it is really a driver issue and not optimized for WinXP. I suggest you install Win7 then use WinXP Mode if you still have legacy programs and hardware.

Result is valid, I just reverted the clocks to stock speed, I just don't wanna show it for now. =D I still have back-ups just in case you wanna catch up. =D

Nice run. =D Wish I could run my M520 at 2.65Ghz too.

I think the GPU was overclocked but has no increase in performance. =D What is the stock speed result? The 4th placer has the same setup as yours but he scored higher. =D