Rasparthe
-
Posts
512 -
Joined
-
Last visited
-
Days Won
1
Content Type
Profiles
Forums
Events
Blogs
Posts posted by Rasparthe
-
-
Many thanks Turrican
-
Ticket ID: 1469
Priority: Low
Can you please add Asus M2V-MX SE as found here:\r\n\r\nhttp://ca.asus.com/en/Motherboards/AMD_AM2/M2VMX_SE\r\n\r\nThanks
-
WOW! Nice gold, congrats!
-
Okay here is screen of the Results tab using Basic.
It doesn't appear that you can save offline results using Basic and you must buy a key for that functionality. Unless someone can direct me how to do it in Basic it appears those unwilling to pay for the benchmark will have to have drivers and the ability to get on the internet to participate.
-
vantage has a results utility page.
Thanks Honda, have to look at that tab closer, I don't remember it looking like yours. I will see if the Basic Edition has the same functionality which I would expect it does.
-
Perhaps the Advanced/Pro versions provide offline saving of a file but I could not find an option to offline submit using the Basic Version. I think Darth is saying that he doesn't have the ability to setup internet on his machine and therefore no verification link for Vantage
-
Does Vantage provide an offline link? I could not find one while using Vantage so had to get Ethernet drivers installed in order to get internet on bench rig. Very annoying and hate having extra drivers running benchmarks
-
Personally I would have liked to have seen all 65nm chips disallowed.
-
Your misread the rules, it was meant to say "Only use Cedar Mill core". Despite that you can submit without an internet connection. You can save the 3dmark file offline and bring it to a computer with an internet connection to submit.
-
You could always just click on the 3dmark verification link. I would hate to drag your focus away from whatever is keeping your attention that you didn't notice. If I have gotten the way to submit using Basic Editon wrong, I'm sure a mod will point me in the right direction, I'm not used to this annoying online verification rules.
-
Seems like a great deal of the subs aren't registering the Hardware portion of the points. They appear in the standings but the detailed view shows 0.0 for points even if its your best sub. Looks to be affecting half of my subs and looks about the same for alot of people.
-
-
Why not participate in points?
-
Was inquiring since the previous posts in this thread indicate the requirement was being removed.
-
Verification link is required? Or not? Still needed to post a score
-
I already was benching on my Pentium D 925...
Guess I will just have to grab my 630 or 640 then... Online Verification for 03 is a bit tricky for competition by the way, owners of the pro edition would have an advantage. In the free version, you can't disable neither CPU tests nor Feature tests, meaning that free edition users would be limited earlier by their hardware. This is questionable in the meaning of competition, you aren't getting sponsored by Futuremark yet, are you Massman?
// Oh yeah, and as the 03 only uses one core (or doesn't it? not sure actually), I don't see the problem of allowing Pentium 4 'D' CPUs.
I agree with you Masterchief. No sure why Pentium D are not allowed. They are Pentium 4 even if dual core. 03 is single threaded as far as I remember so a little confused on the reasoning. Trying to keep a level playing field? Then why allow Cedar Mills? Might as well change the limitation to: Must use Cedar Mill core.
Personally I would like to see if the Pentium D can keep up to the 7Ghz+ Cedar Mills that this limitation is trying to protect. More choices is always better in my book.
-
-
Is Pentium D valid for stage 3?
-
Thx those were the only two. It was odd because I submit the 5 scores in a row and two ended up with x2 CPU even though I used teh autofill option.
Thanks for the fix!
-
I have a couple of scores that I cannot get to apply properly.
http://www.hwbot.org/submission/2246702_rasparthe_wprime_32m_pentium_4_660_50sec_470ms
The problem appears to be that it submits the score as a 2x CPU no matter if I manually change it to 1x or not. I have deleted the score and then resubmitted it and still goes to 2x CPU when I post it....
The other scores (PI, PiFast, etc) I posted for this chip were fine but the Wprime and UCBench score go to 2x CPU no matter what.
-
-
Many thanks!
-
Ahh, it looks like they have them blended. Perhaps they are close enough in architecture that it does not matter? I see that the 2.4 version has CPUz score from both families.
Pentium 4 Mobile 2.4 - http://valid.canardpc.com/show_oc.php?id=806275
Pentium 4-M 2.4 - http://valid.canardpc.com/show_oc.php?id=1774584
-
Not really sure where to post this so I'll ask here and if someone wants to move me to right area that would be appreciated.
Can someone point me to the Pentium 4-M chips? This family of 478 chips here:
http://www.cpu-world.com/CPUs/Pentium_4/TYPE-Mobile%20Pentium%204-M.html
I don't mean the Pentium M on socket 479 nor the Pentium 4 Mobile chips with the 533 FSB. Are they missing entirely from the database?
Rasparthe - GeForce GTX 570 @ 840/1038MHz - 13642 marks 3DMark06
in Result Discussions
Posted
Nope! Can't decide if its the board or the chip though, will not run below -48C. When its running though it is a smooth overclocker.