Jump to content
HWBOT Community Forums

CL3P20

Members
  • Posts

    492
  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won

    1

Posts posted by CL3P20

  1. i guess overclocking is the wrong word to describe "performance submissions".. I agree with the points being 'funny' a bit.. as you would never really enter a competition and "win" against yourself... *Even in martial arts and racing.. you need at least as many competitors as you have podium places...

     

    **Buut - a sub is a sub.. and you can always beat someone else's score/entry by tweaking/tuning more or more effectively. THAT is winning. Though it may seem that Dehenz has found a niche for his server based goods.. i dont think its fair to say that his subs are not 'valid' or worth points.. He runs a tuned OS which is optimized for the benchies he is using. I would venture to say that most users would be hard-pressed to match his scores with the same hardware. Running +1mhz over stock or not is irrelevant.

     

    - ie 2x subs for 32mil Pi are entered... one with cpu @ 5.7ghz, one with cpu @ 5.13ghz... slower CPU has more efficient time and therefor better score. Do you now intend to reduce the points of the user with the slower OC.. because he use "less effort" to make result? ... Surely this is not the way.

     

     

    @ hookie - banana dragon trumps aliens .. :(

  2. How come no one complains when you beat their score with a lower mhz and better efficiency..?

     

    *I mean - Isnt that the whole basis of the OP's argument? : less effort..lower/no OC..

     

    So, basically we could rename the 'Low Clock' competitions to "Complain about scores with a lower OC than yours" competition too right..?

     

    .. really your argument is invalid, because aliens.

×
×
  • Create New...